Literature DB >> 32672820

Association of Chemotherapy With Survival in Elderly Patients With Multiple Comorbidities and Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Node-Positive Breast Cancer.

Nina Tamirisa1, Heather Lin2, Yu Shen2, Simona F Shaitelman3, Meghan Sri Karuturi4, Sharon H Giordano4,5, Gildy Babiera6, Isabelle Bedrosian1.   

Abstract

Importance: Breast cancer risk and comorbidities increase with age. Data are lacking on the association of adjuvant chemotherapy with survival in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities and node-positive breast cancer. Objective: To examine the association of chemotherapy with survival in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities and estrogen receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included patients in the US National Cancer Database who were 70 years or older; had a Charlson/Deyo comorbidity score of 2 or 3; had estrogen receptor-positive, ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu)-negative breast cancer; and underwent surgery for pathologic node-positive breast cancer from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2014. Propensity scores were used to match patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with those not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy based on age, comorbidity score, facility type, facility location, pathologic T and N stage, and receipt of adjuvant endocrine and radiation therapy. Data analysis was performed from December 13, 2018, to April 28, 2020. Exposures: Chemotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The association of adjuvant chemotherapy with overall survival was estimated using a double robust Cox proportional hazards regression model.
Results: Of a total of 2 445 870 patients in the data set, 1592 patients (mean [SD] age, 77.5 [5.5] years; 1543 [96.9%] female) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the initial nonmatched analysis. Of these patients, 350 (22.0%) received chemotherapy and 1242 (78.0%) did not. Compared with patients who did not receive chemotherapy, patients who received chemotherapy were younger (mean age, 74 vs 78 years; P < .001), had larger primary tumors (pT3/T4 tumors: 72 [20.6%] vs 182 [14.7%]; P = .005), and had higher pathologic nodal burden (75 [21.4%] vs 81 [6.5%] with stage pN3 disease and 182 [52.0%] vs 936 [75.4%] with stage pN1 disease; P < .001). More patients who received chemotherapy also received other adjuvant treatments, including endocrine therapy (309 [88.3%] vs 1025 [82.5%]; P = .01) and radiation therapy (236 [67.4%] vs 540 [43.5%]; P < .001). In the matched cohort, with a median follow-up of 43.1 months (95% CI, 39.6-46.5 months), no statistically significant difference was found in median overall survival between the chemotherapy and no chemotherapy groups (78.9 months [95% CI, 78.9 months to not reached] vs 62.7 months [95% CI, 56.2 months to not reached]; P = .13). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, receipt of chemotherapy was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48-0.93; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that in node-positive, estrogen receptor-positive elderly patients with breast cancer and multiple comorbidities, receipt of chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival. Despite attempts to adjust for selection bias, these findings suggest that physicians carefully selected patients likely to derive treatment benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy based on certain unmeasured variables. A standardized, multidisciplinary approach to care may be associated with long-term treatment outcomes in this subset of the population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32672820      PMCID: PMC7366278          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  24 in total

Review 1.  A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Is the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical risk calculator applicable for breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery?

Authors:  Brian Lyle; Jeffrey Landercasper; Jeanne M Johnson; Mohammed Al-Hamadani; Choua A Vang; Jacqueline Groshek; Joy L Hennessy; Lonna M Theede; Kristin Zutavern; Jared H Linebarger
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in older women with hormone receptor-negative breast cancer: assessing outcome in a population-based, observational cohort.

Authors:  Elena B Elkin; Arti Hurria; Nandita Mitra; Deborah Schrag; Katherine S Panageas
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.

Authors:  N Mantel
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1966-03

6.  Breast cancer treatment guidelines in older women.

Authors:  Sharon H Giordano; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Shu-Wan C Kau; Richard L Theriault; Melissa L Bondy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Management of elderly patients with breast cancer: updated recommendations of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) and European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA).

Authors:  Laura Biganzoli; Hans Wildiers; Catherine Oakman; Lorenza Marotti; Sibylle Loibl; Ian Kunkler; Malcolm Reed; Stefano Ciatto; Adri C Voogd; Etienne Brain; Bruno Cutuli; Catherine Terret; Margot Gosney; Matti Aapro; Riccardo Audisio
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Adjuvant chemotherapy in older and younger women with lymph node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Hyman B Muss; Susan Woolf; Donald Berry; Constance Cirrincione; Raymond B Weiss; Daniel Budman; William C Wood; I Craig Henderson; Clifford Hudis; Eric Winer; Harvey Cohen; Judith Wheeler; Larry Norton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Care Among Older Women With Stage I-III Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Traci LeMasters; S Suresh Madhavan; Usha Sambamoorthi; Hannah W Hazard-Jenkins; Kimberly M Kelly; Dustin Long
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 11.908

10.  Differences in management of older women influence breast cancer survival: results from a population-based database in Sweden.

Authors:  Sonja Eaker; Paul W Dickman; Leif Bergkvist; Lars Holmberg
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Adjuvant Treatment of Elderly Breast Cancer Patients: Offer the Best Chances of Cure.

Authors:  Spyridon Marinopoulos; Constantine Dimitrakakis; Andreas Kalampalikis; Flora Zagouri; Angeliki Andrikopoulou; Alexandros Rodolakis
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Low Rates of Medical Oncology Consultation for Older Women (≥ 70 Years) with Newly Diagnosed, Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Gary Ko; Julie Hallet; Katarzyna J Jerzak; Wing Chan; Natalie Coburn; Victoria Barabash; Frances C Wright; Nicole J Look Hong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 4.339

3.  Chemotherapy Decision-Making and Survival Outcomes in Older Women With Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Evidence From Real-World Practice.

Authors:  Meng Xiu; Pin Zhang; Qing Li; Peng Yuan; Jiayu Wang; Yang Luo; Fei Ma; Ruigang Cai; Ying Fan; Qiao Li; Binghe Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  The impact of age and nodal status on variations in oncotype DX testing and adjuvant treatment.

Authors:  Kathleen Iles; Mya L Roberson; Philip Spanheimer; Kristalyn Gallagher; David W Ollila; Paula D Strassle; Stephanie Downs-Canner
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-03-01

5.  Is adjuvant chemotherapy necessary in older patients with breast cancer?

Authors:  Midori Morita; Akihiko Shimomura; Emi Tokuda; Yoshiya Horimoto; Yukino Kawamura; Yumiko Ishizuka; Katsutoshi Sekine; Sayaka Obayashi; Yuki Kojima; Yukari Uemura; Toru Higuchi
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  Improving survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients: do elderly patients benefit from expanded targeted therapeutic options?

Authors:  Hendrik Eggers; Christoph Schünemann; Viktor Grünwald; Linda Rudolph; Maria-Luisa Tiemann; Christoph Reuter; Merle Freya Anders-Meyn; Arnold Ganser; Philipp Ivanyi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 7.  Breast Cancer in Geriatric Patients: Current Landscape and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Hikmat Abdel-Razeq; Fawzi Abu Rous; Fawzi Abuhijla; Nayef Abdel-Razeq; Sarah Edaily
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.829

8.  Suboptimal therapy following breast conserving surgery in triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Johnson; Paula D Strassle; Guilherme C de Oliveira; Chris B Agala; Philip Spanheimer; Kristalyn Gallagher; David Ollila; Hyman Muss; Stephanie Downs-Canner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 4.624

Review 9.  Personalising therapy for early-stage oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in older women.

Authors:  Neil Carleton; Azadeh Nasrazadani; Kristine Gade; Sushil Beriwal; Parul N Barry; Adam M Brufsky; Rohit Bhargava; Wendie A Berg; Margarita L Zuley; G J van Londen; Oscar C Marroquin; Darcy L Thull; Phuong L Mai; Emilia J Diego; Michael T Lotze; Steffi Oesterreich; Priscilla F McAuliffe; Adrian V Lee
Journal:  Lancet Healthy Longev       Date:  2022-01-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.