Background: This study examined receipt of guideline-concordant care (GCC) according to evidence-based treatment guidelines and quality measures and specific types of treatment among older women with breast cancer. Patients and Methods: A total of 142,433 patients aged ≥66 years diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer between 2007 and 2011 were identified in the SEER-Medicare linked database. Algorithms considering cancer characteristics and the appropriate course of care as per guidelines versus actual care received determined receipt of GCC. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the likelihood of GCC and specific types of treatment for women aged ≥75 versus 66 to 74 years. Results: Overall, 39.7% of patients received GCC. Patients diagnosed at stage II or III, with certain preexisting conditions, and of nonwhite race were less likely to receive GCC. Patients with hormone-negative tumors, higher grade tumors, and greater access to oncology care resources were more likely to receive GCC. Patients aged ≥75 years were approximately 40% less likely to receive GCC or adjuvant endocrine therapy, 78% less likely to have any surgery, 61% less likely to have chemotherapy, and about half as likely to have radiation therapy than those aged 66 to 74 years. Conclusions: Fewer than half of older women with breast cancer received GCC, with the lowest rates observed among the oldest age groups, racial/ethnic minorities, and women with later-stage cancers. However, patients with more aggressive tumor characteristics and greater access to oncology resources were more likely to receive GCC. Considering that older women have the highest incidence of breast cancer and that many are diagnosed at stages requiring more aggressive treatment, efforts to increase rates of earlier stage diagnosis and the development of less toxic treatments could help improve GCC and survival while preserving quality of life.
Background: This study examined receipt of guideline-concordant care (GCC) according to evidence-based treatment guidelines and quality measures and specific types of treatment among older women with breast cancer. Patients and Methods: A total of 142,433 patients aged ≥66 years diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer between 2007 and 2011 were identified in the SEER-Medicare linked database. Algorithms considering cancer characteristics and the appropriate course of care as per guidelines versus actual care received determined receipt of GCC. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the likelihood of GCC and specific types of treatment for women aged ≥75 versus 66 to 74 years. Results: Overall, 39.7% of patients received GCC. Patients diagnosed at stage II or III, with certain preexisting conditions, and of nonwhite race were less likely to receive GCC. Patients with hormone-negative tumors, higher grade tumors, and greater access to oncology care resources were more likely to receive GCC. Patients aged ≥75 years were approximately 40% less likely to receive GCC or adjuvant endocrine therapy, 78% less likely to have any surgery, 61% less likely to have chemotherapy, and about half as likely to have radiation therapy than those aged 66 to 74 years. Conclusions: Fewer than half of older women with breast cancer received GCC, with the lowest rates observed among the oldest age groups, racial/ethnic minorities, and women with later-stage cancers. However, patients with more aggressive tumor characteristics and greater access to oncology resources were more likely to receive GCC. Considering that older women have the highest incidence of breast cancer and that many are diagnosed at stages requiring more aggressive treatment, efforts to increase rates of earlier stage diagnosis and the development of less toxic treatments could help improve GCC and survival while preserving quality of life.
Authors: Amelia Y Merrill; Doris R Brown; Heidi D Klepin; Edward A Levine; Marissa Howard-Mcnatt Journal: Am Surg Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: Noam VanderWalde; Reshma Jagsi; Efrat Dotan; Joel Baumgartner; Ilene S Browner; Peggy Burhenn; Harvey Jay Cohen; Barish H Edil; Beatrice Edwards; Martine Extermann; Apar Kishor P Ganti; Cary Gross; Joleen Hubbard; Nancy L Keating; Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki; June M McKoy; Bruno C Medeiros; Ewa Mrozek; Tracey O'Connor; Hope S Rugo; Randall W Rupper; Dale Shepard; Rebecca A Silliman; Derek L Stirewalt; William P Tew; Louise C Walter; Tanya Wildes; Mary Anne Bergman; Hema Sundar; Arti Hurria Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Eric A Engels; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Winnie Ricker; William Wheeler; Ruth Parsons; Joan L Warren Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-08-04 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Hyman B Muss; Susan Woolf; Donald Berry; Constance Cirrincione; Raymond B Weiss; Daniel Budman; William C Wood; I Craig Henderson; Clifford Hudis; Eric Winer; Harvey Cohen; Judith Wheeler; Larry Norton Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-03-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Carrie Luu; Leanne Goldstein; Bryan Goldner; Hans F Schoellhammer; Steven L Chen Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: E C Inwald; O Ortmann; M Koller; F Zeman; F Hofstädter; M Evert; G Brockhoff; M Klinkhammer-Schalke Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Elizabeth Trice Loggers; Diana S M Buist; Laura S Gold; Steven Zeliadt; Rachel Hunter Merrill; Ruth Etzioni; Scott D Ramsey; Sean D Sullivan; Larry Kessler Journal: Int J Breast Cancer Date: 2016-07-25
Authors: Lindsay J Collin; Renjian Jiang; Kevin C Ward; Keerthi Gogineni; Preeti D Subhedar; Mark E Sherman; Mia M Gaudet; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Olivia D'Angelo; Sheryl Gabram-Mendola; Ritu Aneja; Anne H Gaglioti; Lauren E McCullough Journal: JNCI Cancer Spectr Date: 2019-08-07
Authors: Brian De; Shuangshuang Fu; Ying-Shiuan Chen; Prajnan Das; Kimberly Ku; Sean Maroongroge; Kristina D Woodhouse; Karen E Hoffman; Quynh-Nhu Nguyen; Valerie K Reed; Aileen B Chen; Albert C Koong; Benjamin D Smith; Grace L Smith Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 4.711
Authors: Jean A McDougall; Linda S Cook; Mei-Tzu C Tang; Hannah M Linden; Beti Thompson; Christopher I Li Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2020-10-22 Impact factor: 4.090