Jiamei Zhang1,2, Yan Wang3,4, Xiaoqin Chen1,2, Wenjing Wu1,2. 1. Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China. 2. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tianjin, China. 3. Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China. wangyan7143@vip.sina.com. 4. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tianjin, China. wangyan7143@vip.sina.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes between centration on the corneal vertex and the pupil center in corneal refractive surgery. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies. The primary outcomes were the postoperative spherical equivalent (SE), effectiveness [uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) ≥ 20/20, eyes within ± 0.50 diopter (D) of target refraction], and safety [loss ≥ 2 lines of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA)]. Higher-order aberrations were considered secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Seven studies describing a total of 1964 eyes were included in this meta-analysis. A statistical significance in postoperative SE was found between the two centration methods for the correction of myopia that favor the CV-centered method (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the proportion of eyes with UDVA ≥ 20/20 or loss ≥ 2 lines of CDVA postoperatively. However, the proportion of eyes within ± 0.50 D was slightly higher (p = 0.02) and the coma aberration was much lower in the corneal vertex-centered method (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preferable visual and refractive outcomes could be achieved with either centering on the corneal vertex or pupil center in corneal refractive surgery; however, the corneal vertex-centered method has shown partial benefits in some clinical indices. In order to obtain higher quality of clinical evidences, more randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required in further investigations.
PURPOSE: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes between centration on the corneal vertex and the pupil center in corneal refractive surgery. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies. The primary outcomes were the postoperative spherical equivalent (SE), effectiveness [uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) ≥ 20/20, eyes within ± 0.50 diopter (D) of target refraction], and safety [loss ≥ 2 lines of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA)]. Higher-order aberrations were considered secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Seven studies describing a total of 1964 eyes were included in this meta-analysis. A statistical significance in postoperative SE was found between the two centration methods for the correction of myopia that favor the CV-centered method (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the proportion of eyes with UDVA ≥ 20/20 or loss ≥ 2 lines of CDVA postoperatively. However, the proportion of eyes within ± 0.50 D was slightly higher (p = 0.02) and the coma aberration was much lower in the corneal vertex-centered method (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preferable visual and refractive outcomes could be achieved with either centering on the corneal vertex or pupil center in corneal refractive surgery; however, the corneal vertex-centered method has shown partial benefits in some clinical indices. In order to obtain higher quality of clinical evidences, more randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required in further investigations.
Authors: Silvestre Manzanera; Pedro M Prieto; Antonio Benito; Juan Tabernero; Pablo Artal Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 4.799