BACKGROUND: The magnetic sphincter augmentation device (MSA) provides effective relief of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Dysphagia after MSA implantation sometimes prompts endoscopic dilation. The manufacturer's instructions are that it be performed 6 or more weeks after implantation under fluoroscopic guidance to not more than 15 mm keeping 3 or more beads closed. The purpose of this study was to assess adherence to these recommendations and explore the techniques used and outcomes after MSA dilation. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We conducted a multicenter retrospective review of patients undergoing dilation for dysphagia after MSA placement from 2012 to 2018. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients underwent 245 dilations. The median size of MSA placed was 14 beads (range 12-17) and the median time to dilation was 175 days. A second dilation was performed in 67 patients, 22 patients had a third dilation and 7 patients underwent 4 or more dilations. In total, 17 devices (11.8%) were eventually explanted. The majority of dilations were performed with a balloon dilator (81%). The median dilator size was 18 mm and 73.4% were done with a dilator larger than 15 mm. There was no association between dilator size and need for subsequent dilation. Fluoroscopy was used in 28% of cases. There were no perforations or device erosions related to dilation. DISCUSSION: There is no clinical credence to the manufacturer's recommendation for the use of fluoroscopy and limitation to 15 mm when dilating a patient for dysphagia after MSA implantation. Use of a larger size dilator was not associated with perforation or device erosion, but also did not reduce the need for repeat dilation. Given this, we would recommend that the initial dilation for any size MSA device be done using a 15 mm through-the-scope balloon dilator. Dysphagia prompting dilation after MSA implantation is associated with nearly a 12% risk of device explantation.
BACKGROUND: The magnetic sphincter augmentation device (MSA) provides effective relief of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Dysphagia after MSA implantation sometimes prompts endoscopic dilation. The manufacturer's instructions are that it be performed 6 or more weeks after implantation under fluoroscopic guidance to not more than 15 mm keeping 3 or more beads closed. The purpose of this study was to assess adherence to these recommendations and explore the techniques used and outcomes after MSA dilation. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We conducted a multicenter retrospective review of patients undergoing dilation for dysphagia after MSA placement from 2012 to 2018. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients underwent 245 dilations. The median size of MSA placed was 14 beads (range 12-17) and the median time to dilation was 175 days. A second dilation was performed in 67 patients, 22 patients had a third dilation and 7 patients underwent 4 or more dilations. In total, 17 devices (11.8%) were eventually explanted. The majority of dilations were performed with a balloon dilator (81%). The median dilator size was 18 mm and 73.4% were done with a dilator larger than 15 mm. There was no association between dilator size and need for subsequent dilation. Fluoroscopy was used in 28% of cases. There were no perforations or device erosions related to dilation. DISCUSSION: There is no clinical credence to the manufacturer's recommendation for the use of fluoroscopy and limitation to 15 mm when dilating a patient for dysphagia after MSA implantation. Use of a larger size dilator was not associated with perforation or device erosion, but also did not reduce the need for repeat dilation. Given this, we would recommend that the initial dilation for any size MSA device be done using a 15 mm through-the-scope balloon dilator. Dysphagia prompting dilation after MSA implantation is associated with nearly a 12% risk of device explantation.
Entities:
Keywords:
Dilation; Dysphagia; GERD; LINX; Magnetic sphincter augmentation
Authors: Robert A Ganz; Steven A Edmundowicz; Paul A Taiganides; John C Lipham; C Daniel Smith; Kenneth R DeVault; Santiago Horgan; Garth Jacobsen; James D Luketich; Christopher C Smith; Steven C Schlack-Haerer; Shanu N Kothari; Christy M Dunst; Thomas J Watson; Jeffrey Peters; Brant K Oelschlager; Kyle A Perry; Scott Melvin; Willem A Bemelman; André J P M Smout; Dan Dunn Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2015-06-02 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Heather F Warren; Lisa M Brown; Matias Mihura; Alexander S Farivar; Ralph W Aye; Brian E Louie Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Katrin Schwameis; Shahin Ayazi; Ping Zheng; Andrew D Grubic; Madison Salvitti; Toshitaka Hoppo; Blair A Jobe Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2020-12-30 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Jessica L Reynolds; Joerg Zehetner; Phil Wu; Shawn Shah; Nikolai Bildzukewicz; John C Lipham Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Reginald Bell; John Lipham; Brian Louie; Valerie Williams; James Luketich; Michael Hill; William Richards; Christy Dunst; Dan Lister; Lauren McDowell-Jacobs; Patrick Reardon; Karen Woods; Jon Gould; F Paul Buckley; Shanu Kothari; Leena Khaitan; C Daniel Smith; Adrian Park; Christopher Smith; Garth Jacobsen; Ghulam Abbas; Philip Katz Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2018-07-18 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Brian E Louie; Alexander S Farivar; Dale Shultz; Christina Brennan; Eric Vallières; Ralph W Aye Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2014-06-21 Impact factor: 4.330