Literature DB >> 26095560

Laparoscopic Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation vs Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: A Matched-Pair Analysis of 100 Patients.

Jessica L Reynolds1, Joerg Zehetner1, Phil Wu1, Shawn Shah1, Nikolai Bildzukewicz1, John C Lipham2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) with the LINX device (Torax Medical) has been reported in several short-and long-term studies, rivaling historic results of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF), but with fewer side effects. However, there have been no studies comparing patients with similar disease to validate these results. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1-year outcomes of patients undergoing MSA and LNF from June 2010 to June 2013. Patients were matched using propensity scores incorporating multiple preoperative variables. Outcomes were measured by GERD Health Related Quality of Life scores, proton-pump inhibitor use, satisfaction, and complications.
RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-nine patients met inclusion criteria, 62 MSA and 117 LNF. Propensity score matching identified 50 patients in both groups using the "best-fit" model with a caliper of 0.5 SD. At 1 year after surgery, both groups had similar GERD Health Related Quality of Life scores (4.2 MSA and 4.3 LNF; p = 0.897) and proton-pump inhibitor use (17% of MSA and 8.5% of LNF; p = 0.355). Although there was no difference in the number of patients reporting mild gas and bloating (27.6% MSA and 27.6% LNF; p = 1.000), there were no patients with severe gas and bloating in the MSA group compared with 10.6% in the LNF group (p = 0.022). More LNF patients were unable to belch (8.5% of MSA and 25.5% of LNF; p = 0.028) or vomit (4.3% of MSA and 21.3% of LNF; p = 0.004). The incidence of postoperative dysphagia was similar between the groups (46.8% MSA and 44.7% LNF; p = 0.766).
CONCLUSIONS: Analogous GERD patients had similar control of reflux symptoms after both MSA and LNF. The inabilities to belch and vomit were significantly fewer with MSA, along with a significantly lower incidence of severe gas-bloat symptoms. These results support the use of MSA as first-line therapy in patients with mild to moderate GERD.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26095560     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  34 in total

1.  A budget impact analysis of a magnetic sphincter augmentation device for the treatment of medication-refractory mechanical gastroesophageal reflux disease: a United States payer perspective.

Authors:  John Pandolfino; John Lipham; Amarpreet Chawla; Nicole Ferko; Andrew Hogan; Rana A Qadeer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Reflux, Sleeve Dilation, and Barrett's Esophagus after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Daniel Moritz Felsenreich; Ronald Kefurt; Martin Schermann; Philipp Beckerhinn; Ivan Kristo; Michael Krebs; Gerhard Prager; Felix B Langer
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: review of clinical studies.

Authors:  Emanuele Asti; Alberto Aiolfi; Veronica Lazzari; Andrea Sironi; Matteo Porta; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-07-18

4.  Factors influencing the outcome of magnetic sphincter augmentation for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Heather F Warren; Lisa M Brown; Matias Mihura; Alexander S Farivar; Ralph W Aye; Brian E Louie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  LINX® magnetic esophageal sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Skubleny; Noah J Switzer; Jerry Dang; Richdeep S Gill; Xinzhe Shi; Christopher de Gara; Daniel W Birch; Clarence Wong; Matthew M Hutter; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  SAGES technology and value assessment committee (TAVAC) safety and effectiveness analysis: LINX® reflux management system.

Authors:  Dana A Telem; Andrew S Wright; Paresh C Shah; Matthew M Hutter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Mind the Gap: Current Treatment Alternatives for GERD Patients Failing Medical Treatment and Not Ready for a Fundoplication.

Authors:  Phuong Huynh; Vani Konda; Suchakree Sanguansataya; Marc A Ward; Steven G Leeds
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 1.719

8.  Ineffective Esophageal Motility in Patients with GERD is no Contraindication for Nissen Fundoplication.

Authors:  Milena Nikolic; Katrin Schwameis; Ivan Kristo; Matthias Paireder; Aleksa Matic; Georg Semmler; Lorenz Semmler; Sebastian F Schoppmann
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Surgical Anti-Reflux Options Beyond Fundoplication.

Authors:  Dan Azagury; John Morton
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-07

Review 10.  Revaluation of the efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Hongke Zhang; Dinghui Dong; Zhengwen Liu; Shuixiang He; Liangshuo Hu; Yi Lv
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.