Lisa Henriksen1, Nina C Schleicher1, Trent O Johnson1, Elizabeth Andersen-Rodgers2, Xueying Zhang2, Rebecca Williams3. 1. Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA. 2. Surveillance Unit, Center for Healthy Communities, California Tobacco Control Program, California Department of Public Health, Sacramento, CA. 3. Evaluation and Surveillance Section, Center for Healthy Communities, California Tobacco Control Program, California Department of Public Health, Sacramento, CA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether California's 2017 cigarette tax increase was passed onto smokers equally. METHODS: Auditors recorded 4 cigarette prices in the same random sample of licensed tobacco retailers (N = 1049) before the tax increase (January-March 2017) and after (April-September 2018): Natural American Spirit (ultra-premium), Newport menthol (premium), and Pall Mall (value) all from the same manufacturer, and Marlboro (premium). Ordinary least squares regressions examined how the gap in prices (increase greater or less than $2.00 tax) varied by market segment and neighborhood demographics, controlling for store type and months since implementation. Paired t-tests assessed whether industry/retail revenue (price in excess of state and federal excise taxes) increased. RESULTS: Over-shifting (increase greater than tax) was evident for all 4 brands and was significantly greater for ultra-premium (Mean = $0.40, SD = 0.75) than premium (Mean = $0.25, SD = 0.78) and greater for premium than value brand (Mean = $0.16, SD = 0.67). However, under-shifting (increase less than tax) was evident for Newport in African-American neighborhoods and Pall Mall in Hispanic neighborhoods. After the tax increase, prices were significantly more likely to be discounted and significantly more stores advertised a discount on cigarettes. CONCLUSION: California's tax increase was not passed onto consumers equally. Non-tax mechanisms to increase price could support intended effects of tobacco taxes.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether California's 2017 cigarette tax increase was passed onto smokers equally. METHODS: Auditors recorded 4 cigarette prices in the same random sample of licensed tobacco retailers (N = 1049) before the tax increase (January-March 2017) and after (April-September 2018): Natural American Spirit (ultra-premium), Newport menthol (premium), and Pall Mall (value) all from the same manufacturer, and Marlboro (premium). Ordinary least squares regressions examined how the gap in prices (increase greater or less than $2.00 tax) varied by market segment and neighborhood demographics, controlling for store type and months since implementation. Paired t-tests assessed whether industry/retail revenue (price in excess of state and federal excise taxes) increased. RESULTS: Over-shifting (increase greater than tax) was evident for all 4 brands and was significantly greater for ultra-premium (Mean = $0.40, SD = 0.75) than premium (Mean = $0.25, SD = 0.78) and greater for premium than value brand (Mean = $0.16, SD = 0.67). However, under-shifting (increase less than tax) was evident for Newport in African-American neighborhoods and Pall Mall in Hispanic neighborhoods. After the tax increase, prices were significantly more likely to be discounted and significantly more stores advertised a discount on cigarettes. CONCLUSION: California's tax increase was not passed onto consumers equally. Non-tax mechanisms to increase price could support intended effects of tobacco taxes.
Entities:
Keywords:
cigarettes; race/ethnicity; taxation; tobacco industry
Authors: Jennifer Cantrell; Ollie Ganz; Andrew Anesetti-Rothermel; Paul Harrell; Jennifer M Kreslake; Haijun Xiao; Jennifer L Pearson; Donna Vallone; Thomas R Kirchner Journal: Health Place Date: 2015-01-05 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Xin Xu; Michael F Pesko; Michael A Tynan; Robert B Gerzoff; Ann M Malarcher; Terry F Pechacek Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Lisa Henriksen; Nina C Schleicher; Dianne C Barker; Yawen Liu; Frank J Chaloupka Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Rosemary Hiscock; J Robert Branston; Ann McNeill; Sara C Hitchman; Timea R Partos; Anna B Gilmore Journal: Tob Control Date: 2017-10-09 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: David T Levy; Alex C Liber; Christopher Cadham; Luz Maria Sanchez-Romero; Andrew Hyland; Michael Cummings; Cliff Douglas; Rafael Meza; Lisa Henriksen Journal: Tob Control Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 6.953
Authors: Zongshuan Duan; Katelyn F Romm; Lisa Henriksen; Nina C Schleicher; Trent O Johnson; Theodore L Wagener; Steven Y Sussman; Barbara A Schillo; Jidong Huang; Carla J Berg Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 3.390