Literature DB >> 34988582

Trends in Cigarette Marketing Expenditures, 1975-2019: An Analysis of Federal Trade Commission Cigarette Reports.

Haijing Ma1, Alexandria E Reimold2, Kurt M Ribisl1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: With tightened regulations on cigarette marketing and decreased smoking, the major tobacco companies quickly shifted their marketing expenditures in recent decades to maintain profits. We investigated cigarette marketing expenditures in the United States from 1975 through 2019 to examine the trends in cigarette marketing expenditures over the past 45 years. AIMS AND METHODS: Cigarette marketing expenditure data were obtained from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) cigarette reports, 1975-2019. Based on individual expenditure categories included in the FTC reports, we created seven aggregate categories for marketing expenditures: Retail; Print; Out of home; Free tobacco products and gifts; Sports, public entertainment, and sponsorships; Telephone and digital; and Other. Dollar amounts and percentages by category were examined to assess trends in marketing expenditures.
RESULTS: Cigarette marketing expenditures increased since 1975 and peaked in 2003 at $21.1 billion (adjusted dollars); afterward, they declined dramatically until 2010 and remained stable at around $9 billion through 2019. While all other expenditures decreased, retail expenditures increased, comprising more than 50% of expenditures in 1988 and reaching about 98% in 2019. In the retail category, tobacco companies spent the most on promotional allowances, coupons, and retail-value-added bonuses between 1988 and 2003, after which price discounts dominated retail spending.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, cigarette marketing expenditures peaked in 2003 and retail first became the leading category in 1988. Tobacco companies adapted their marketing strategies in retail and allocated most of their retail spending on price discounts since 2003 to lower cigarette prices. IMPLICATIONS: The major US tobacco companies directed the bulk of their vast spending on the retail environment since 1988. Moreover, they have dramatically shifted their marketing strategies within the retail category from cigarette advertising before 2003 to customer-directed price discounts since then. This shift may imply a change in focus from recruiting new smokers to retaining current smokers, in response to tax increases and government regulations. Accordingly, restrictions on price-related promotions in retail and nontax strategies should be implemented to counter tobacco companies' marketing efforts in retail.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34988582      PMCID: PMC9048889          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntab272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   5.825


  15 in total

1.  How did the Master Settlement Agreement change tobacco industry expenditures for cigarette advertising and promotions?

Authors:  John P Pierce; Elizabeth A Gilpin
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2004-07

2.  Direct-to-Consumer Marketing of Cigar Products in the United States.

Authors:  Ollie Ganz; Lyubov Teplitskaya; Jennifer Cantrell; Elizabeth C Hair; Donna Vallone
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Federal and state cigarette excise taxes - United States, 1995-2009.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 17.586

4.  Re-examining the price sensitivity of demand for cigarettes with quantile regression.

Authors:  Chiang-Ming Chen; Kuo-Liang Chang; Lin Lin
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.913

5.  Tobacco Marketing and Subsequent Use of Cigarettes, E-Cigarettes, and Hookah in Adolescents.

Authors:  Tess Boley Cruz; Rob McConnell; Brittany Wagman Low; Jennifer B Unger; Mary Ann Pentz; Robert Urman; Kiros Berhane; Chih Ping Chou; Fei Liu; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  The tobacco industry and underage youth smoking: tobacco industry documents from the Minnesota litigation.

Authors:  C L Perry
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  1999-09

7.  Tax, price and cigarette smoking: evidence from the tobacco documents and implications for tobacco company marketing strategies.

Authors:  F J Chaloupka; K M Cummings; C P Morley; J K Horan
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  The US Cigarette Industry: An Economic and Marketing Perspective.

Authors:  David Levy; Frank Chaloupka; Eric N Lindblom; David T Sweanor; Richard J O'Connor; Ce Shang; Ron Borland
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2019-03

9.  Mind the Gap: Changes in Cigarette Prices After California's Tax Increase.

Authors:  Lisa Henriksen; Nina C Schleicher; Trent O Johnson; Elizabeth Andersen-Rodgers; Xueying Zhang; Rebecca Williams
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2019-11

Review 10.  The impact of tobacco promotion at the point of sale: a systematic review.

Authors:  Janine Paynter; Richard Edwards
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.244

View more
  1 in total

1.  Harmane Potentiates Nicotine Reinforcement Through MAO-A Inhibition at the Dose Related to Cigarette Smoking.

Authors:  Zheng Ding; Xiangyu Li; Huan Chen; Hongwei Hou; Qingyuan Hu
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.261

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.