Literature DB >> 34993663

Identify factors for insufficient (> 2 yr) mammogram screening among Oregonian women.

Zhenzhen Zhang1, Grace Curran2, Kenneth Xu3, Jeong Youn Lim4, Paige E Farris5, Jackilen Shannon5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Women with breast cancer diagnosed from mammogram screenings have a lower mortality risk than women diagnosed from symptoms. Currently, the U.S Preventive Services Task Force recommends biannual screening for women aged 50-74 years old. In this study, we aimed to identify factors associated with inadequate screening defined as "no mammogram screening within past 2 years" to guide cancer prevention and early detection efforts.
METHODS: This study utilized area-based probabilistic sampling survey data, collected across Oregon in 2019. Dataset weights were calculated using a raking approach. Demographic and behavior information were collected with existing validated questionnaire items from national surveys. Weighted multivariable logistic regression analyses with missing-value imputations were conducted to identify factors associated with inadequate mammogram screening.
RESULTS: The study included 254 women 50-74 years old without previous breast or ovarian cancer history. 19.29% of the sample reported no mammogram within two years, including 1.57% with no previous mammograms. Following unadjusted analyses, the significant factors included education, occupation status, health insurance and smoking and were therefore included into the adjusted model. In the multivariate adjusted model education remained significant while occupation status, health insurance and smoking were no longer significant. Compared to women with a college graduate degree, women with less than college graduate degree were at higher risk of inadequate screening [OR (95% CI) = 3.23 (1.54, 6.74)].
CONCLUSIONS: Lack of education was significantly associated with inadequate mammogram screening even after adjusting for occupation status, health insurance and smoking, which should prompt further outreach and education.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mammogram; Oregon; Prevention; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34993663      PMCID: PMC9438964          DOI: 10.1007/s10552-021-01529-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.532


  30 in total

1.  Patient Barriers to Mammography Identified During a Reminder Program.

Authors:  Adrianne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; A Gabriela Rosales; Jennifer Schneider; Mary M Rix; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Explaining the relation between education and postmenopausal breast cancer.

Authors:  K E Heck; E R Pamuk
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Breast cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Carol E DeSantis; Jiemin Ma; Mia M Gaudet; Lisa A Newman; Kimberly D Miller; Ann Goding Sauer; Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca L Siegel
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Understanding Hmong women's beliefs, feelings, norms, and external conditions about breast and cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Maichou Lor; Pa Yiar Khang; Pa Xiong; Kao Feng Moua; Diane Lauver
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 1.462

5.  The contribution of risk factors to the higher incidence of invasive and in situ breast cancers in women with higher levels of education in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition.

Authors:  Gwenn Menvielle; Anton E Kunst; Carla H van Gils; Petra H Peeters; Hendriek Boshuizen; Kim Overvad; Anja Olsen; Anne Tjonneland; Silke Hermann; Rudolf Kaaks; Manuela M Bergmann; Anne-Kathrin Illner; Pagona Lagiou; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Antonia Trichopoulou; Domenico Palli; Franco Berrino; Amelia Mattiello; Rosario Tumino; Carlotta Sacerdote; Anne May; Evelyn Monninkhof; Tonje Braaten; Eiliv Lund; José Ramón Quirós; Eric J Duell; Maria-José Sánchez; Carmen Navarro; Eva Ardanaz; Signe Borgquist; Jonas Manjer; Kay Tee Khaw; Naomi E Allen; Gillian K Reeves; Véronique Chajes; Sabina Rinaldi; Nadia Slimani; Valentina Gallo; Paolo Vineis; Elio Riboli; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Breast cancer screening attitudes and behaviors of rural and urban women.

Authors:  H Bryant; Z Mah
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 7.  Measurement of socioeconomic status in health disparities research.

Authors:  Vickie L Shavers
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.798

8.  Influence of patients' socioeconomic status on clinical management decisions: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Susannah M Bernheim; Joseph S Ross; Harlan M Krumholz; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 2).

Authors:  Bruna Galobardes; Mary Shaw; Debbie A Lawlor; John W Lynch; George Davey Smith
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  The Association Between Education and Smoking Prevalence, Independent of Occupation: A Nationally Representative Survey in Japan.

Authors:  Kimiko Tomioka; Norio Kurumatani; Keigo Saeki
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 3.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.