Literature DB >> 32669930

Real-world impact of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a population-based analysis.

A E Drohan1, C M Hoogerboord1, P M Johnson1, G J Flowerdew2, G A Porte1,2.   

Abstract

Background: Randomized trials have demonstrated equivalent oncologic outcomes and decreased morbidity in patients with rectal cancer who undergo laparoscopic surgery (lapsx) compared with open surgery (opensx). The objective of the present study was to compare short-term outcomes after lapsx and opensx in a real-world setting.
Methods: A national discharge abstract database was used to identify all patients who underwent rectal cancer resection in Canada (excluding Quebec) from April 2004 through March 2015. Short-term outcomes examined included same-admission mortality and length of stay (los).
Results: Of 28,455 patients, 82.4% underwent opensx, and 17.6%, lapsx. The use of lapsx increased to 34% in 2014 from 5.9% in 2004 (p < 0.0001). Same-admission mortality was lower among patients undergoing lapsx than among those undergoing opensx (1.08% and 1.95% respectively, p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, the odds of same-admission mortality with lapsx was 36% lower than that with opensx (odds ratio: 0.64; p = 0.003). Median los was shorter after lapsx than after opensx (5 days and 8 days respectively, p = 0.0001). The strong association of lapsx with shorter los was maintained on multivariable analysis controlling for patient, surgeon, and hospital factors. Conclusions: For patients with rectal cancer, shorter los and decreased same-admission mortality are associated with the use of lapsx compared with opensx. 2020 Multimed Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; laparoscopy; length of stay; mortality

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32669930      PMCID: PMC7339839          DOI: 10.3747/co.27.5829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  37 in total

1.  Isolated rectal cancer surgery: a 2007-2014 population study based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Mario Saia; Alessandra Buja; Domenico Mantoan; Gino Sartor; Ferdinando Agresta; Vincenzo Baldo
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-04-13

2.  Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Bing Li; Chantal M Couris; Kiyohide Fushimi; Patrick Graham; Phil Hider; Jean-Marie Januel; Vijaya Sundararajan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Surgeon Annual and Cumulative Volumes Predict Early Postoperative Outcomes after Rectal Cancer Resection.

Authors:  Heather L Yeo; Jonathan S Abelson; Jialin Mao; Paul R A O'Mahoney; Jeffrey W Milsom; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Binghong Xiong; Li Ma; CaiQuan Zhang; Yong Cheng
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Is the benefit of laparoscopy maintained in elderly patients undergoing rectal cancer resection? An analysis of 446 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Gilles Manceau; Elisabeth Hain; Léon Maggiori; Cécile Mongin; Justine Prost À la Denise; Yves Panis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Jiejing Qiu; Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Robotic-assisted surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma: short-term and midterm outcomes from 200 consecutive cases at a single institution.

Authors:  Masayasu Hara; Kevin Sng; Byung Eun Yoo; Jae Won Shin; Dong Won Lee; Seon Hahn Kim
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Laparoscopically assisted vs. open elective colonic and rectal resection: a comparison of outcomes in English National Health Service Trusts between 1996 and 2006.

Authors:  O Faiz; J Warusavitarne; A Bottle; P P Tekkis; A W Darzi; R H Kennedy
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  The more the better?: the impact of surgeon and hospital volume on in-hospital mortality following colorectal resection.

Authors:  Paul J Karanicolas; Luc Dubois; Patrick H D Colquhoun; Carol J Swallow; Stephen D Walter; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes: a systematic review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Johannes Morche; Tim Mathes; Dawid Pieper
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.