Durgesh K Dwivedi1, Yin Xi2, Payal Kapur3, Ananth J Madhuranthakam4, Matthew A Lewis1, Durga Udayakumar4, Robert Rasmussen1, Qing Yuan1, Aditya Bagrodia5, Vitaly Margulis5, Michael Fulkerson1, James Brugarolas6, Jeffrey A Cadeddu5, Ivan Pedrosa7. 1. Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. 2. Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Clinical Science, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. 3. Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Kidney Cancer Program, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. 4. Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Kidney Cancer Program, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. 5. Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Kidney Cancer Program, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. 6. Kidney Cancer Program, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. 7. Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Kidney Cancer Program, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. Electronic address: Ivan.Pedrosa@utsouthwestern.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous renal mass biopsy results can accurately diagnose clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC); however, their reliability to determine nuclear grade in larger, heterogeneous tumors is limited. We assessed the ability of radiomics analyses of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to predict high-grade (HG) histology in ccRCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy patients with a renal mass underwent 3 T MRI before surgery between August 2012 and August 2017. Tumor length, first-order statistics, and Haralick texture features were calculated on T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI after manual tumor segmentation. After a variable clustering algorithm was applied, tumor length, washout, and all cluster features were evaluated univariably by receiver operating characteristic curves. Three logistic regression models were constructed to assess the predictability of HG ccRCC and then cross-validated. RESULTS: At univariate analysis, area under the curve values of length, and DCE texture cluster 1 and cluster 3 for diagnosis of HG ccRCC were 0.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.82, false discovery rate P = .008), 0.72 (95% CI, 0.59-0.84, false discovery rate P = .004), and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63-0.87, false discovery rate P = .0009), respectively. At multivariable analysis, area under the curve for model 1 (tumor length only), model 2 (length + DCE clusters 3 and 4), and model 3 (DCE cluster 1 and 3) for diagnosis of HG ccRCC were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.54-0.79), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.71-0.92), and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.70-0.91), respectively. CONCLUSION: Radiomics analysis of MRI images was superior to tumor size for the prediction of HG histology in ccRCC in our cohort.
INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous renal mass biopsy results can accurately diagnose clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC); however, their reliability to determine nuclear grade in larger, heterogeneous tumors is limited. We assessed the ability of radiomics analyses of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to predict high-grade (HG) histology in ccRCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy patients with a renal mass underwent 3 T MRI before surgery between August 2012 and August 2017. Tumor length, first-order statistics, and Haralick texture features were calculated on T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI after manual tumor segmentation. After a variable clustering algorithm was applied, tumor length, washout, and all cluster features were evaluated univariably by receiver operating characteristic curves. Three logistic regression models were constructed to assess the predictability of HG ccRCC and then cross-validated. RESULTS: At univariate analysis, area under the curve values of length, and DCE texture cluster 1 and cluster 3 for diagnosis of HG ccRCC were 0.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.82, false discovery rate P = .008), 0.72 (95% CI, 0.59-0.84, false discovery rate P = .004), and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63-0.87, false discovery rate P = .0009), respectively. At multivariable analysis, area under the curve for model 1 (tumor length only), model 2 (length + DCE clusters 3 and 4), and model 3 (DCE cluster 1 and 3) for diagnosis of HG ccRCC were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.54-0.79), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.71-0.92), and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.70-0.91), respectively. CONCLUSION: Radiomics analysis of MRI images was superior to tumor size for the prediction of HG histology in ccRCC in our cohort.
Authors: E Jason Abel; Stephen H Culp; Matthew Meissner; Surena F Matin; Pheroze Tamboli; Christopher G Wood Journal: BJU Int Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Benjamin E Niver; Erin F Fitzgerald; James S Babb; Hersh Chandarana; Jonathan Melamed Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Stella K Kang; Angela Zhang; Pari V Pandharipande; Hersh Chandarana; R Scott Braithwaite; Benjamin Littenberg Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Maryellen R M Sun; Long Ngo; Elizabeth M Genega; Michael B Atkins; Myra E Finn; Neil M Rofsky; Ivan Pedrosa Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Natalie L Demirjian; Bino A Varghese; Steven Y Cen; Darryl H Hwang; Manju Aron; Imran Siddiqui; Brandon K K Fields; Xiaomeng Lei; Felix Y Yap; Marielena Rivas; Sharath S Reddy; Haris Zahoor; Derek H Liu; Mihir Desai; Suhn K Rhie; Inderbir S Gill; Vinay Duddalwar Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-11-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Dumitru A Iacobas; Victoria E Mgbemena; Sanda Iacobas; Kareena M Menezes; Huichen Wang; Premkumar B Saganti Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2020-12-08 Impact factor: 6.639