| Literature DB >> 32668728 |
Yi-Shan Tsai1, Ming-Lun Yeh1,2, Pei-Chien Tsai1,3, Ching-I Huang1, Chung-Feng Huang1,2,3,4, Meng-Hsuan Hsieh1,2,3,4, Ta-Wei Liu1, Yi-Hung Lin1, Po-Cheng Liang1, Zu-Yau Lin1,2, Shinn-Cherng Chen1,2, Jee-Fu Huang1,2, Wan-Long Chuang1,2,5, Chia-Yen Dai1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Ming-Lung Yu1,2,3,5,6.
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections can cause permanent liver-related diseases, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Low mortality and incidence of HCC have been observed in patients with chronic hepatitis C undergoing direct-acting antiviral therapy. Tumor suppressive let-7 family members are down-regulated in HCC. The present study, therefore, aimed to investigate whether expression levels for the full spectrum of let-7 family members (let-7a, 7b, 7c, 7d, 7e, 7f, 7g, 7i, and miR-98) in the circulatory system are useful as surveillance biomarkers for liver-related diseases to monitor treatment efficacy during HCV infection. To this end, we measured the levels of mature circulating let-7 family members using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR in 236 patients with HCV infection, and 147 age- and sex-matched controls. Using hierarchical cluster analysis and principal component analysis, three clusters were obtained after measuring expression levels of let-7 family members in the patients and controls. Cluster 1 included let-7a/d/e/g, Cluster 2 comprised let-7b and let-7i, and Cluster 3 comprised let-7c/f/miR-98. Let-7b/c/g represented the three clusters and showed the best survival response to liver cancer when analyzed with respect to patient data. Therefore, considering the circulating levels of let7 b/c/g as representatives of the let-7 family may facilitate effective monitoring of liver-related disease.Entities:
Keywords: biomarker; chronic hepatitis C; hepatitis C virus; hepatocellular carcinoma; let-7 family; miRNA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32668728 PMCID: PMC7404305 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21144945
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Descriptive characteristics of baseline factors in study participants (n = 383) 1.
| Control Group | CHC Group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 54.82 ± 9.96 | 55.11 ± 8.70 | 0.7705 |
| Gender (F/M) | 71/76 | 120/116 | 0.6276 |
| BMI | 25.09 ± 3.80 | 25.33 ± 3.57 | 0.5337 |
| Total viral load [log10 (IU/mL) #] | N/A | 5.62 ± 0.84 | N/A |
| HCV genotype | N/A | (131/100/5) | N/A |
| HCC (−/+) % | N/A | (94.9/5.1) | N/A |
| LC (−/+) % | N/A | (86/14) | N/A |
| Cr | 0.98 ± 0.18 | 0.83 ± 0.25 | < 0.0001 * |
| AST (IU/L) | 24.62 ± 9.13 | 90.13 ± 52.90 | < 0.0001 * |
| ALT (IU/L) | 26.48 ± 18.23 | 122.48 ± 69.00 | < 0.0001 * |
| GGT (IU/L) | 33.08 ± 23.50 | 68.46 ± 65.51 | < 0.0001 * |
| WBC | 6370.88 ± 1699.14 | 5430.42 ± 1623.39 | < 0.0001 * |
| PLT(×103/µL) | 252.85± 66.63 | 152.42 ± 61.06 | < 0.0001 * |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 14.42 ± 1.44 | 14.02 ± 1.46 | 0.0085 * |
| TG (mg/dL) | 133.42 ± 99.02 | 98.87 ± 56.52 | 0.0002 * |
| CHLO (mg/dL) | 213.61 ± 39.74 | 169.11 ± 35.53 | < 0.0001 * |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 55.54 ± 14.26 | 45.47 ± 14.87 | < 0.0001 * |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 123.20 ± 33.33 | 99.54 ± 31.78 | < 0.0001 * |
| AC_sugar (mg/dL) | 92.26 ± 20.49 | 103.71 ± 32.25 | < 0.0001 * |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.88 ± 0.78 | 5.92 ± 1.07 | 0.7101 |
1 BMI, body mass index; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; LC, liver cirrhosis; Cr, creatinine; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; γGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; WBC, white blood cell count; PLT, platelet count; TG, triglyceride; CHLO, cholesterol; HDL-C, HDL cholesterol; LDL-C, LDL cholesterol; AC_Sugar, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c. All values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The p value was calculated for the continuous variables using the Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney test, and the χ2 test was used for the categorical variables, with α = 0.05. * = p < 0.05. # The HCV virus loads were determined by log-transformation.
Circulating let-7 family expression at baseline (Log102−△) 1.
| Control | CHC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| let-7a | −1.04 ± 0.74 | −1.91 ± 0.57 | < 0.0001 * |
| let-7b | −0.42 ± 0.43 | −1.56 ± 0.60 | < 0.0001 * |
| let-7c | −2.04 ± 0.36 | −2.17 ± 0.44 | < 0.0014 * |
| let-7d | −1.09 ± 0.61 | −1.92 ± 0.50 | < 0.0001 * |
| let-7e | −0.95 ± 0.64 | −1.68 ± 0.62 | < 0.0001 * |
| let-7f | −1.59 ± 0.54 | −2.18 ± 0.40 | < 0.0001 * |
| let-7g | −1.28 ± 0.52 | −1.88 ± 0.55 | < 0.0001 * |
| let-7i | −0.78 ± 0.47 | −1.82 ± 0.57 | < 0.0001 * |
| miR-98 | −1.77 ± 0.54 | −2.29 ± 0.33 | < 0.0001 * |
1 Data is presented as the mean ± SD. △Ct = Ctarget – CTcel39; * = p < 0.05 following statistical analysis using an ANOVA with Bonferroni correction (α = 0.0056).
Figure 1Hierarchical clustering plot (heatmap) of circulating let-7 family in the control group without hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (n = 147) and HCV-infected patients (n = 236).
Correlation between circulating expression of let-7 family members and various clinical parameters (n = 236) 1.
| Age | AST | ALT | PLT | HCV RNA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cluster1 | let7a | −0.0986 | −0.1898 * | −0.0772 | 0.2433 * | 0.1118 |
| let7d | −0.0846 | −0.1757 | −0.0747 | 0.2209 * | 0.0829 | |
| let7e | −0.1431 | −0.1504 | −0.0546 | 0.2113 * | 0.1211 | |
| let7g | −0.1495 | −0.2038 * | −0.1041 | 0.1911 * | 0.1386 | |
| Cluster2 | let7b | −0.0172 | −0.0746 | −0.0106 | 0.1384 | 0.1118 |
| let7i | −0.1141 | −0.126 | −0.0153 | 0.1365 | 0.0848 | |
| Cluster3 | let7c | −0.0456 | −0.1298 | −0.0448 | 0.0473 | 0.0753 |
| let7f | −0.045 | −0.1576 | −0.0499 | 0.0728 | 0.1442 | |
| miR98 | −0.0195 | −0.0915 | −0.0373 | 0.0046 | 0.062 |
1 Data represents correlation between miRNA expression and the values of each clinical parameter, as reported in Table 1. Correlation was determined using Pearson’s test. AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; PLT, platelet count; HCV, hepatitis C viral load. * = p < 0.05 following the Bonferroni correction (α = 0.0056).
Figure 2Hierarchical clustering plot (heatmap) of the let-7 miRNA family expression in healthy (n = 50) and tumor (n = 366) liver tissue samples obtained from TCGA-LIHC.
Figure 3Dot plot showing the relationship between the expression of let-7 family members in normal (n = 50) and tumor (n = 366) tissues from liver cancer patients in the TCGA dataset. Log2 (RPM +1) transformed values for let-7 family members are shown as the mean ± SD. Prominent declines in let-7b/c/g are indicated by red lines. Statistical significance was assessed using the Mann–Whitney test. The p values are represented as follows: ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001.
Figure 4Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival analysis curve for let-7 family expression in TCGA-LIHC patients. The KM survival curves were examined according to (A) let-7 a/b/c/d/e/f/g/i expression level and (B) let-7 a/b/c/g/i expression levels. No differences in overall survival were observed. (C) let-7 b/c/g expression levels and (D) let-7 b/c expression levels show clear differences in overall survival. Statistical significance was obtained by log-rank tests, with α = 0.05.