Chung-Feng Huang1, Ming-Lun Yeh2, Pei-Chien Tsai2, Meng-Hsuan Hsieh3, Hua-Ling Yang2, Ming-Yen Hsieh4, Jeng-Fu Yang3, Zu-Yau Lin5, Shinn-Cherng Chen5, Liang-Yen Wang5, Chia-Yen Dai6, Jee-Fu Huang7, Wan-Long Chuang5, Ming-Lung Yu8. 1. Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Hepatobiliary Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Occupational Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Faculty of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 2. Hepatobiliary Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 3. Department of Preventive Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 4. Hepatobiliary Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 5. Hepatobiliary Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Faculty of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 6. Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Hepatobiliary Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Faculty of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Preventive Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Electronic address: fish6069@gmail.com. 7. Hepatobiliary Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Faculty of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 8. Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Hepatobiliary Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Faculty of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Electronic address: fish6069@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients with cirrhosis remain at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) even after achieving sustained virological response (SVR). The aim of the study was to explore the incidence and risk for HCC among non-cirrhotic patients with an SVR. METHODS: A total of 642 patients with an SVR after peginterferon/ribavirin therapy were enrolled with a median follow-up period of 53.0 months (range: 6-133 months). RESULTS: Thirty-three of the 642 (5.1%) patients developed HCC over 2324.8 person-years of follow-up. Cox regression analysis revealed that the strongest predictive factor of HCC occurrence was liver cirrhosis (HR 4.98, 95% CI 2.32-10.71, p<0.001), followed by age (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.11, p=0.005) and γGT levels (HR 1.008, 95% CI 1.004-1.013, p<0.001). The incidence of HCC did not differ between patients with high and low baseline γGT levels among patients with cirrhosis (p=0.53), but the incidence of HCC was significantly higher in non-cirrhotic patients with high γGT levels compared with those with low γGT levels (p=0.001). Cox regression analysis revealed that the strongest factors associated with HCC development in non-cirrhotic sustained responders were baseline γGT levels (HR 6.44, 95% CI 2.20-18.89, p=0.001) and age (HR 3.68, 95% CI 1.33-10.17, p=0.012). The incidence of HCC was not different between older non-cirrhotic patients with high γGT levels and cirrhotic patients (p=0.34). CONCLUSIONS: HCC remains a threat in non-cirrhotic patients with an SVR. Serum γGT levels helped to identify potential patients at high risk.
BACKGROUND & AIMS:Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infectedpatients with cirrhosis remain at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) even after achieving sustained virological response (SVR). The aim of the study was to explore the incidence and risk for HCC among non-cirrhotic patients with an SVR. METHODS: A total of 642 patients with an SVR after peginterferon/ribavirin therapy were enrolled with a median follow-up period of 53.0 months (range: 6-133 months). RESULTS: Thirty-three of the 642 (5.1%) patients developed HCC over 2324.8 person-years of follow-up. Cox regression analysis revealed that the strongest predictive factor of HCC occurrence was liver cirrhosis (HR 4.98, 95% CI 2.32-10.71, p<0.001), followed by age (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.11, p=0.005) and γGT levels (HR 1.008, 95% CI 1.004-1.013, p<0.001). The incidence of HCC did not differ between patients with high and low baseline γGT levels among patients with cirrhosis (p=0.53), but the incidence of HCC was significantly higher in non-cirrhotic patients with high γGT levels compared with those with low γGT levels (p=0.001). Cox regression analysis revealed that the strongest factors associated with HCC development in non-cirrhotic sustained responders were baseline γGT levels (HR 6.44, 95% CI 2.20-18.89, p=0.001) and age (HR 3.68, 95% CI 1.33-10.17, p=0.012). The incidence of HCC was not different between older non-cirrhotic patients with high γGT levels and cirrhotic patients (p=0.34). CONCLUSIONS: HCC remains a threat in non-cirrhotic patients with an SVR. Serum γGT levels helped to identify potential patients at high risk.