| Literature DB >> 32664977 |
Gul Ambreen1,2, Afshan Siddiq3, Kashif Hussain4, Abdul Saboor Hussain3, Zara Naz5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Statins are considered as standard drugs to control cholesterol levels, but their use is also associated with renal hypertrophy, hemorrhagic stroke, hepatomegaly, and myopathy. Murraya koenigii is an herb that is used in traditional cuisine and as a medicine in South Asia. Here we assessed the antidyslipidemic and antiatherosclerotic effects of this spice in repeated heated mix vegetable oils (RHMVO)-induced atherosclerotic models.Entities:
Keywords: Murraya koenigii; Oxidative stress; Repeated heated; Vegetable oils
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32664977 PMCID: PMC7362559 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-020-03012-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Med Ther ISSN: 2662-7671
Comparison of organs weight post-induction and after-treatment
| Organs | Observation Time | Control (weight-g) | RHMVO (weight-g) | Mk LE-300 (weight-g) | Mk LE-500 (weight-g) | Lovastatin (weight-g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liver | Post induction (week16) | 53.66 ± 1.35 | 86.25 ± 2.62 | 87.38 ± 1.88 | 85.26 ± 1.92 | 86.24 ± 2.22 |
| After treatment (week26) | 60.31 ± 4.33 | 104.95 ± 2.6 | 83.76 ± 1.89 | 63.17 ± 2.56 ** | 75.51 ± 2.26* | |
| Spleen | Post induction (week16) | 34.37 ± 1.47 | 56.89 ± 2.15 | 57.1 ± 2.25 | 55.75 ± 3.09 | 55.09 ± 3.46 |
| After treatment (week26) | 40.88 ± 3.42 | 74.96 ± 4.5 | 54.08 ± 2.26 | 42.48 ± 1.2** | 51.27 ± 2.52 | |
| Heart | Post induction (week16) | 18.08 ± 1.39 | 34.75 ± 0.9 | 34.92 ± 1.09 | 34.9 ± 1.14 | 34.95 ± 1.15 |
| After treatment (week26) | 18.54 ± 5.92 | 49.17 ± 4.84 | 32.83 ± 1.09 | 29.31 ± 1.14* | 31.86 ± 1.12 | |
| Kidney | Post induction (week16) | 14.41 ± 0.9 | 27.74 ± 1.53 | 27.97 ± 1.63 | 27.77 ± 1.74 | 28.11 ± 1.94 |
| After treatment (week26) | 17.98 ± 2.43 | 37.16 ± 2.18 | 25.99 ± 1.28 | 21.05 ± 1.38* | 25.6 ± 0.55 |
*Significantly reduced from post-induction weight (p < 0.05)
**Significantly reduced from post-induction weight (p < 0.005)
# significantly increased from the post-induction weight (p < 0.05)
## Significantly increased from post-induction weight (p < 0.005)
Fig. 1Graphical Presentation, Comparing the Weight Gain in Different Groups During the Study Period (at 95% CI): (Control = Blue line showing the gradual increment in bodyweight with age, RHMVO fed group = Green line showing significant weight gain, Mk LE-300 group = Brown line showing the weight reduction over week 16 to 26, lovastatin group = Red line showing significant weight reduction, Mk LE-500 group = Purple line showing the significant weight reduction comparable with red line of lovastatin group
Comparison of lipid profile through the study period (baseline till week-26)
| Observation Time | Control | RHMVO | Mk LE-300 | Mk LE-500 | Lovastatin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| week 1-baseline | 56.32 ± 3.51 | 55.43 ± 2.21 | 55.62 ± 3.28 | 57.08 ± 3.80 | 56.58 ± 3.18 |
| week 16 | 69.08 ± 2.92 | 272.18 ± 1.76** | 279.61 ± 6.76** | 281.4 ± 6.03** | 276.01 ± 12.31** |
| week 20 | 73.17 ± 2.11 | 309.26 ± 1.83** | 251.83 ± 6.16 | 256.01 ± 6.19 | 255.67 ± 12.05 |
| week 23 | 74.75 ± 3.42 | 330.61 ± 1.55** | 220.05 ± 6.28 | 218.76 ± 5.05 | 224.46 ± 12.92 |
| week 26 | 75.93 ± 4.0 | 352.07 ± 6.74** | 179.06 ± 6.09 | 166.51 ± 3.08 | 195.2 ± 12.41 |
| week 1- baseline | 141.02 ± 3.21 | 140.12 ± 3.25 | 141.21 ± 5.02 | 141.30 ± 3.55 | 141.25 ± 1.58 |
| week 16 | 148.54 ± 4.25 | 444.5 ± 8.23** | 446.31 ± 8.59** | 450.35 ± 8.91** | 443.29 ± 11.61** |
| week 20 | 150.19 ± 5.23 | 503.45 ± 8.09** | 394.07 ± 8.23 | 378.1 ± 8.09 | 388.08 ± 11.06 |
| week 23 | 151.84 ± 3.02 | 562.4 ± 8.55** | 350.75 ± 7.99 | 289.85 ± 8.23 | 333.82 ± 11.31 |
| week 26 | 154.4 ± 3.87 | 637.75 ± 9.99** | 308.51 ± 8.32 | 200.59 ± 8.59 | 280.61 ± 11.38 |
| week 1- baseline | 48.23 ± 3.29 | 47.22 ± 1.29 | 48.01 ± 3.31 | 47.59 ± 3.98 | 47.29 ± 3.19 |
| week 16 | 67.66 ± 3.31 | 367.61 ± 15.22** | 366.21 ± 18.30** | 363.57 ± 14.69** | 361.63 ± 14.17** |
| week 20 | 68.87 ± 3.06 | 405.59 ± 18.23** | 351.9 ± 15.09 | 326.36 ± 14.09 | 326.62 ± 14.29 |
| week 23 | 69.72 ± 3.25 | 439.84 ± 10.59** | 333.59 ± 11.66 | 271.24 ± 11.05 | 278.36 ± 10.09 |
| week 26 | 73.92 ± 2.88 | 481.22 ± 75.05** | 311.35 ± 18.36 | 213.59 ± 10.29## | 240.65 ± 12.07# |
| week 1- baseline | 11.08 ± 0.56 | 11.22 ± 0.77 | 11.21 ± 0.81 | 11.10 ± 0.67 | 11.02 ± 0.66 |
| week 16 | 14.88 ± 0.74 | 82.18 ± 3.97** | 82.73 ± 4.49** | 84.27 ± 4.29** | 82.55 ± 3.89** |
| week 20 | 15.84 ± 0.70 | 90.43 ± 3.29** | 77.52 ± 4.20 | 73.06 ± 5.20 | 72.38 ± 3.34 |
| week 23 | 16.65 ± 0.62 | 98.68 ± 5.02** | 70.31 ± 4.35 | 55.85 ± 4.35# | 60.49 ± 3.09 |
| week 26 | 16.52 ± 0.53 | 105.55 ± 3.07** | 62.2 ± 2.21 | 30.64 ± 4.04## | 48.51 ± 4.52# |
| week 1- baseline | 53.23 ± 8.69 | 53.33 ± 7.05 | 53.53 ± 6.05 | 54.59 ± 6.29 | 53.09 ± 8.34 |
| week 16 | 69.64 ± 3.35 | 16.08 ± 1.67$$ | 15.78 ± 2.17$$ | 15.03 ± 2.22$$ | 15.03 ± 2.19$$ |
| week 20 | 70.92 ± 6.09 | 13 ± 1.38$$ | 21.99 ± 2.01 | 32.18 ± 2.56^ | 24.28 ± 2.65 |
| week 23 | 71.18 ± 2.95 | 9.32 ± 2.08$$ | 40.08 ± 3.55^ | 67.43 ± 4.05 | 34.63 ± 5.29 |
| week 26 | 73.92 ± 5.01 | 5.64 ± 2.59$$ | 58.06 ± 3.23 | 81.68 ± 2.92 | 42.89 ± 4.84 |
**highly significant difference (p < 0.005) (increased values) than week 1- baseline (Before induction) values
# significant difference (p < 0.05) (decreased values) than week 16- (post induction) values
## highly significant difference (p < 0.005) (decreased values) than week 16- (Post induction) values
$$ highly significant difference (p < 0.005) (decreased values) than week 1- baseline (Before induction) values
^ significant difference (p < 0.05) (increased values) than week 16- (post induction) values
^^ highly significant difference (p < 0.005) (increased values) than week 16- (post induction) values
% significant difference (p < 0.05) (increased values) than control group in corresponding weeks
TRIG Triglycerides, TC Total cholesterol, LDL Low-density lipoproteins, VLDL Very-low-density lipoproteins, HDL High-density lipoproteins
Comparison of oxidative stress and liver function markers at week-26
| Variables | Control ## | RHMVO** | Mk LE-300 | Mk LE-500 | Lovastatin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPK (U/L) | 148.17 ± 2.29 | 1116.85 ± 9.27 | 981.81 ± 8.55** | 562.84 ± 13.78 ** ## | 947.84 ± 17.41** # |
| LDH (U/L) | 212.44 ± 45.38 | 1214.21 ± 9.71 | 986.64 ± 4.86** # | 508.13 ± 9.05 * ## | 831.42 ± 12.85 ** # |
| Homocysteine (μMol/L) | 4.62 ± 0.54 | 15.88 ± 1.08 | 10.57 ± 1.33* # | 5.26 ± 1.04 ## | 11.33 ± 0.91** |
| MDA (nMol/ml) | 8 .00 ± 1.43 | 29.7 ± 1.32 | 20.68 ± 2.42** # | 12.14 ± 1.69 * ## | 19.77 ± 1.71 ** # |
| CRP (mg/dl) | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 14.64 ± 2.16 | 11.93 ± 1.52** # | 4.39 ± 1.57 * ## | 9.81 ± 0.98** |
| SGPT (U/L) | 92.9 ± 4.65 | 376.23 ± 8.33 | 305.5 ± 2.85** | 208.93 ± 70.98 * ## | 301.82 ± 10.57** |
| SGOT (U/L) | 95.28 ± 5.11 | 404.28 ± 8.77 | 311.41 ± 3.91** | 185.3 ± 35.78 * ## | 315.42 ± 6.45** |
| ALP (U/L) | 82.89 ± 4.8 | 635.25 ± 4.98 | 556.35 ± 3.07** | 217.2 ± 9.26 * ## | 355.59 ± 6.82** # |
| Total Protein (mg/dl) | 7.42 ± 0.43 | 2.5 ± 0.24 | 3.51 ± 0.25* | 5.45 ± 0.29 * # | 2.11 ± 0.13** |
| Albumin (mg/dl) | 3.42 ± 0.46 | 1.08 ± 0.04 | 2.06 ± 0.05# | 3.09 ± 0.12## | 1.56 ± 0.43* |
*Significantly different from Control (p < 0.05). #significantly different from RHMVO (p < 0.05). **Significantly different from Control (p < 0.005). ##significantly different from RHMVO (p < 0.005)
Quantitative extraction yield and chemical content of Mk LE
| Sample | Extraction yields | Chemical composition | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) = weight of sample extract /sample weight) × 100 | Total phenols (mg gallic acid equivalent /g Mk LE) | Total flavonoid (mg catechin equivalent. /g Mk LE) | Chlorophyll content (mg/g Mk LE | Alkaloid content (mg bismuth nitrate/g Mk LE) | Total tannin (mg tannic acid equivalent /g Mk LE) | |
| 15.63 ± 0.46 | 46.78 ± 0.07 | 6.1 ± 0.36 | 0.40 ± 0.009 | 37.9 ± 0.28 | 0.129 ± 0.008 | |
Values represented as means ± SD
Fig. 2Atheroma formation and resolution at the end of 26 weeks: (a) Control; with no atheromatous plaques formation (b) RHMVO fed group; extensive atheromatous plaques formation, covered about 80–85% of the aortic arch (c) Mk LE-300 group; atheromatous plaque reduced to 60% (d) Mk LE-500 group; atheromatous plaque reduced to 40% (e) lovastatin group; Atheromatous plaque reduced to 57%
Fig. 3Histopathological finding of rabbits’ liver after 10 weeks of treatment. Control: a microscopic view of a normal liver. RHMVO fed group: a microscopic view of fatty liver showing distended hepatocytes due to fat vacuoles. Mk LE-300 group: observed a lesser number of fat vacuoles in the portal area. Mk LE-500 group: observed an insignificant number of fat vacuoles. Lovastatin group: observed an insignificant number of fat vacuoles (200x magnification)