Regiodivergent Hydroborative Ring Opening of Epoxides via Selective C-O Bond Activation.

A magnesium-catalyzed regiodivergent C-O bond cleavage protocol is presented. Readily available magnesium catalysts achieve the selective hydroboration of a wide range of epoxides and oxetanes yielding secondary and tertiary alcohols in excellent yields and regioselectivities. Experimental mechanistic investigations and DFT calculations provide insight into the unexpected regiodivergence and explain the different mechanisms of the C-O bond activation and product formation.

Introduction

The broad presence of n class="Chemical">hydroxyl moieties in pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and fragrance chemistry have led to the development of efficient protocols for their synthesis.[1] In this regard, class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">epoxides can be easily converted to alcohols via a ring-opening reaction. It is well-known that nonsymmetrical epoxides afford mixtures of regioisomers, where ratios between linear and branched alcohols are strongly dependent on the reducing agent employed.[2] In past decades, great efforts have been made to overcome regioselectivity problems of the ring-opening reaction of epoxides.[2] The catalytic C–O bond cleavage is limited because of the high stability of the corresponding metal-alkoxide products, which impedes the regeneration of the metal hydride intermediate.[3] One of the most employed catalytic methods for the ring-opening of epoxides is transition-metal-catalyzed hydrogenation, either by using heterogeneous or homogeneous catalysts.[4] In all cases, high temperatures and H2 pressures are required, leading to poor selectivity along with the generation of oligomers or saturated hydrocarbons as byproducts (Scheme a). In recent years, the transition-metal-catalyzed hydroboration has appeared as a plausible alternative to the hydrogenation protocols. The use of the mild reductant pinacolborane resulted in good selectivities, however, exclusively toward linear alcohols (Scheme a).[5]

Scheme 1

Catalytic Methods for the Regioselective Ring Opening of Epoxides

Alkaline-earth n class="Chemical">metals are among the most abundant class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">metals in the crust of the earth. Despite their abundance and low toxicity, their application has been mainly focused on the hydrofunctionalization of polarized unsaturated bonds.[6,7] Since the first structurally characterized magnesium–hydride complex by Jones and Stasch and co-workers,[8] great efforts have been carried out to understand the Mg–H reactivity and its application as a valuable alternative to transition-metal hydride species.[6] As a result, magnesium complexes, mostly containing anionic β-diketiminate ligands,[9] have been successfully applied to the hydroboration of polarized and unpolarized unsaturated bonds.[10] In certain cases, even low-cost and readily available dialkylmagnesium could be applied as a catalyst.[11] Given the current limitations in the catalytic regiodivergent ring opening of epoxides, we decided to explore whether simple magnesium catalysts would allow for the selective C–O bond activation, leading to either branched or linear alcohols in good yields and with broad functional group tolerance (Scheme b). We here report the development of such a regiodivergent reaction and explain the mechanism supported by experiment and computation.

We began our investigations with the n class="Chemical">magnesium-catalyzed hydroboration of class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">styrene oxide 1a by evaluating the activity and selectivity of readily available MgBu2 (Table ). When the catalyst loading was decreased, the activity was maintained (Table entry 1 vs 2). Whereas all catalytic methods for the hydroboration of epoxides provided the linear regioisomer,[5] the magnesium catalyst provided the branched product. The regioselectivity could be improved by decreasing the reaction temperature (Table , entry 2 vs entry 3). Testing different solvents led to a small increase in regioselectivity when THF was used (Table , entry 4). Finally, by decreasing the reaction concentration (Table , entry 5), we reached better results. It should be pointed out that performing the catalytic reaction in neat conditions (Table , entry 6) resulted in a lower regioselectivity.

Table 1

Reaction Optimizationa

entry	MgBu2 (mol %)	T (°C)	solvent	2a:3a (b:l)c	conv. (%)d
1	10	50	toluene	80:20	99
2	5	50	toluene	80:20	99
3	5	40	toluene	84:16	99
4	5	40	THF	87:13	99
5b	5	40	THF	89:11	99 (95)
6	5	40	neat	66:33	99
7		40	THF	n.d.	<5

1a (1 mmol), HBpin (1.5 equiv), MgBu2 (0.5 M in heptane), solvent [1 M] for 24 h.

THF [0.5 M].

Selectivities determined by 1H NMR.

Conversions determined by GC. Isolated yield in parentheses.

1a (1 mmol), n class="Chemical">HBpin (1.5 equiv), class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">MgBu2 (0.5 M in heptane), solvent [1 M] for 24 h.

pan class="Chemical">THF [0.5 M].

Following this optimization, we explored the scope and limitations of the n class="Chemical">MgBu2-catalyzed regioselective hydroboration of class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">epoxides (Scheme ) starting with monosubstituted terminal epoxides, which lead to secondary alcohols (2a–2h). When aromatic substituents are present, good to excellent regioselectivities were obtained, regardless of the electronic nature of the aromatic moiety. Use of epoxides bearing an alkyl substituent (1d–1h) showed full regioselectivity and good yields. On the basis of the good performance observed, also substrates with alkenyl moieties (1e–1f) were tested. Fortunately, no influence on the chemoselectivity toward the C–O cleavage was observed and the products were isolated in good yields. Encouraged by these results, we decided to test disubstituted terminal epoxides (1i–1s). In this case, tertiary alcohols, important synthesis building blocks also found in several natural products,[12] were obtained in excellent yields and regioselectivities. Again, different electronic and steric properties on the aryl group (2i–2l) did not influence either the activities or selectivities. When different alkyl-substituted substrates (2m–2o) were applied, excellent results were preserved. Interestingly, diphenyl epoxide 1p also underwent hydroboration regioselectively. In a similar manner, the MgBu2-catalyzed hydroboration of trifluoromethyl-containing epoxide 1q also provided exclusively the branched alcohol 2q in excellent yields and regioselectivities. We were delighted to see that this good performance could also be extended to epoxides present in macrocycles, affording in all cases the tertiary alcohols 2r and 2s in excellent yields and regioselectivities. When symmetrical disubstituted epoxides were studied (1t–1v), the corresponding alcohols 2t–2v could be isolated in good yields, although higher temperatures were required.

Scheme 2

Scope of the MgBu2-Catalyzed Hydroboration of Epoxides and Oxetanes

1a–1aj (1 mmol), HBpin (1.5 equiv), MgBu2 (5 mol %, 0.5 M in heptane), THF [0.5 M], 40 °C for 24 h. Isolated yields.

Toluene [1 M], 10 mol % MgBu2, 90 °C.

Enantioselectivities were determined by HPLC. Diastereoselectivities were determined by 1H NMR. (R)- and (S)-1m, (S)-1n, and (R)- and (S)-1o epoxides were used in 99% ee purity. (R)-1n epoxide was used in 97% ee purity (all isolated from preparative HPLC; for more information, see Supporting Information). Epoxides 1w, 1x, 1y, 1z, and 1aa were diasteriomerically pure.

MgBu2 (5 mol %, 0.5 M in heptane), toluene [1 M], 75 °C for 24 h.

1a–1aj (1 mmol), n class="Chemical">HBpin (1.5 equiv), class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">MgBu2 (5 mol %, 0.5 M in heptane), THF [0.5 M], 40 °C for 24 h. Isolated yields.

pan class="Chemical">Toluene [1 M], 10 mol % class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">MgBu2, 90 °C.

Enantioselectivities were determined by HPLC. Diastereoselectivities were determined by 1H NMR. pan class="Chemical">(R)- and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">(S)-1m, (S)-1n, and (R)- and (S)-1o epoxides were used in 99% ee purity. (R)-1n epoxide was used in 97% ee purity (all isolated from preparative HPLC; for more information, see Supporting Information). Epoxides 1w, 1x, 1y, 1z, and 1aa were diasteriomerically pure.

n class="Chemical">MgBu2 (5 mol %, 0.5 M in class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">heptane), toluene [1 M], 75 °C for 24 h.

n class="Chemical">Tertiary alcohols are present in several natural products or drug derivatives.[12] Thus, the synthesis of enantiomerically pure class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">tertiary alcohols is of great interest. In this regard a few catalytic asymmetric reactions are known,[13] with the catalytic asymmetric addition of carbon-nucleophiles to ketones as the most synthetically used approach.[14] Motivated by the above results, we decided to test the MgBu2-catalyzed hydroboration protocol for both (R)- and (S)-enantiomers of 2,2-disubstituted epoxides 1m–1n and 1q. Importantly, no loss of enanatiomeric excess was observed and the tertiary alcohols were in optically pure form. This good performance was also extended when chiral epoxides derived from natural products or drug derivatives were tested under the same reaction conditions. When l-camphor (1w)-, α-thujone (1x)-, and l-menthone (1y)-derived epoxides were studied, good yields and excellent regio- and diastereoselectivities were obtained. We were also pleased to see that sterol-derived epoxides 1z and 1aa also underwent hydroboration effectively with excellent yields and regio- and diastereoselectivities.

The findings make us wonder whether less reactive oxacylic rings, such as n class="Chemical">oxetanes and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">oxolanes, could also be applied in the Mg-catalyzed ring opening. To the best of our knowledge, there is no catalytic method reported for the hydroboration reaction involving these unreactive compounds. To our delight, the hydroboration could also be applied and monosubstituted oxetanes containing aryl substituents (1ab–1af) underwent ring opening to give the corresponding branched alcohols 2ab–2af in good yields and excellent regioselectivities. This good performance was also maintained when alkyl substituents are present at the 2-position (1ag–1ah), although lower conversions were observed. When symmetrical oxetanes 1ai–1aj were tested, the corresponding alcohols 2ai–2aj were also isolated in moderate to good yields. Encouraged by these results, we decided to study the MgBu2-catalyzed hydroboration of 2-phenyloxolane. Unfortunately, even under harsher reaction conditions, no conversion was observed for these less reactive oxacycles. Thus, we wondered if the replacement of the ligand (i.e., butyl) would have an effect on the catalytic activity. Inspired by our recent findings in which (i) Mg(OR)2 (where (OR)2 = BINOL) was shown to activate HBpin toward ketone reduction via a cooperative magnesium-ligand activation,[15a] and (ii) Mg(NTf2)2 acting as an efficient Lewis acid toward alkyne activation,[15b] we decided to replace MgBu2 by Mg(NTf2)2 and to evaluate the influence on both the activity and the selectivity. To our surprise, the application of Mg(NTf2)2 in the hydroboration of 2,2-disubstituted epoxide 1i resulted in the linear alcohol product 4a (2ai) (Scheme ).

Scheme 3

Regiodivergent Magnesium-Catalyzed Hydroboration of Epoxides

This complete regioselectivity switch is very interesting and points to a different n class="Chemical">HBpin activation and ring-opening mechanism. Several class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">2,2-disubstituted terminal epoxides with sterically hindered or polyaromatic ring substitutions (4b and 4c) as well as linear and cyclic alkyl substituents (4d–4l) were then applied (Scheme ). The scope could also be extended diaryl-substituted substrate and 2,2-diphenylethan-1-ol 4m was obtained quantitatively. Overall, the Mg(NTf2)2-catalyzed hydroboration results in good yields and complete selectivity toward linear alcohols.

Scheme 4

Mg(NTf2)2-Catalyzed Hydroboration of Epoxides

1 (1 mmol), Mg(NTf2)2 (5 mol %), HBpin (1.5 equiv) in THF [0.5 M] at 40 °C for 24 h.

Mg(NTf2)2 (10 mol %).

1 (1 mmol), n class="Chemical">Mg(class="Chemical">pan class="Gene">NTf2)2 (5 mol %), HBpin (1.5 equiv) in THF [0.5 M] at 40 °C for 24 h.

pan class="Chemical">Mg(class="Chemical">pan class="Gene">NTf2)2 (10 mol %).

Thus, we successfully developed a regiodivergent ring opening of n class="Chemical">epoxides by applying two readily available and low-cost class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">magnesium catalysts. On one hand, our MgBu2–HBpin catalytic system can be applied to a broad range of substrates providing branched alcohols with excellent chemo- and regioselectivities without the loss of enantioselectivity. On the other hand, the use of Mg(NTf2)2 as catalyst provides the complementary ring-opening reaction leading to the linear alcohols. Considering the unexpected regiodivergence observed by using either MgBu2 or Mg(NTf2)2, we decided to conduct several experiments to gain insight into the different reaction mechanisms (Scheme ).

Scheme 5

Control Experiments

Mechanistic Study

Control Experiments

We assumed that the regiodivergency is caused by the nature of the different n class="Chemical">magnesium catalysts. However, given that class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">BH3 is capable of catalyzing the hydroboration of olefins,[16] and due to examples in the literature that describe the decomposition of HBpin to BH3 by alkali salts,[17] we decided to investigate if BH3 could catalyze the hydroboration of epoxides to either a linear or branched alcohol. Therefore, BH3·THF and BH3·SMe2 were tested in the reaction. However, both did not efficiently catalyze the hydroboration (Scheme a), providing low conversions and a mixture of branched and isomerization byproduct (for more detail, see the Supporting Information). Subsequently, we investigated the deuterium incorporation by using DBpin (Scheme b).

When the n class="Chemical">MgBu2-catalytic system was tested, the secondary class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">alcohol 2d- was isolated with full D-incorporation at the β-methyl moiety. This result suggested that the BuMg-D species in situ formed would attack the least substituted carbon of the epoxide ring (Scheme b1). Moreover, no isomerization was observed. We also carried out the same D-incorporation experiments by using Mg(NTf2)2. In this case, quantitative D-incorporation was observed at the less substituted carbon (Scheme b2). This result, together with the complete regiodivergence observed, suggests that the latter mechanism operates via a 1,2-H shift,[18a] producing an aldehyde intermediate, which finally undergoes reduction via a D-addition. This epoxide isomerization is in agreement with the work reported by Weinwald[18a] and Mazet using Pd or Ir catalysts.[18b,18c] Consequently, we carried out an isomerization experiment (Scheme c). When epoxide 1i was mixed with catalytic amounts of Mg(NTf2)2 complex, we observed the formation of aldehyde 5. This result supports the notion that Lewis acidic Mg(NTf2)2 is an efficient catalyst for the Meinwald rearrangement (1,2-H shift)[18a] of terminal disubstituted epoxides to the corresponding aldehyde, which is in agreement with the control experiments (Scheme b2). Finally, we conducted a racemization experiment (Scheme d). As shown, MgBu2 catalyzes the ring opening of an enantiopure epoxide without loss of enantioselectivity (Scheme , compounds 2m, 2n, and 2q). When enantiopure epoxide 1m was tested in the presence of Mg(NTf2)2 catalyst, rac-4h was obtained, which can be explained by the formation of a carbocation intermediate.

Computational Study

Supported by control experimental results, we performed DFT calculations (Computational Details in the Supporting Information) to define possible reaction pathways for both catalytic systems, pan class="Chemical">MgBu2 and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">Mg(NTf2)2. Epoxide 1i was selected as the prototype substrate.

MgBu2-Catalyzed Mechanism

As previously reported, hydroboration reactions using n class="Chemical">MgBu2 as the catalyst occur via in situ formation of the active catalytic species class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">BuMg–H.[11] The energy profile for the formation of BuMg–H by the reaction of MgBu2 with HBpin is discussed in Figure S1 (see the Supporting Information). Within the reaction conditions used in this work, BuMg–H can be stabilized by solvent molecules (THF), by HBpin, or by 1i, as shown in Figure S2. Among all the possibilities, the most stable geometry is A in which two THF molecules are coordinated to Mg, and we considered it as the starting state in the catalytic cycle. The overall pathway is divided into two sections: ring opening of the epoxide (Figure ) and metathesis of the Mg–O and H–B bonds (Figure ).

Figure 1

Computed energy profile for the ring-opening step in MgBu2-catalyzed hydroboration of the epoxide reaction. Free energy values at M06-2X(SMD, THF solvent)/Def2-TZVPP//PBE0/Def2-SVP level of theory are presented.

Figure 2

Computed energy profile for the metathesis of Mg–O and B–H bonds in MgBu2-catalyzed hydroboration of the epoxide reaction. For energy convention refer to Figure .

Computed energy profile for the ring-opening step in n class="Chemical">MgBu2-catalyzed hydroboration of the class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">epoxide reaction. Free energy values at M06-2X(SMD, THF solvent)/Def2-TZVPP//PBE0/Def2-SVP level of theory are presented.

Computed energy profile for the metathesis of n class="Chemical">Mg–O and B–H bonds in class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">MgBu2-catalyzed hydroboration of the epoxide reaction. For energy convention refer to Figure .

Calculations indicate that a bimolecular ring-opening mechanism is operative; see Figure . The reaction pathway starts with the transfer of a pan class="Chemical">hydride from A to an class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">epoxide molecule coordinated to the Mg of another A molecule, via the transition state of TS1. This bimolecular epoxide ring-opening step is required to overcome a free energy span of 24.0 kcal/mol from the reference state corresponding to two A molecules. The resulting ionic intermediates A and A are 27.5 kcal/mol lower in energy than the starting two A molecules. The next two steps, from A + A to A + A, correspond to substantially thermoneutral dissociation of a THF molecule from A yielding A, and to substitution of a THF molecule of A by an epoxide molecule, yielding A. The reaction proceeds by another epoxide opening by hydride transfer from A to A via another bimetallic transition state, TS2. This ring opening is clearly more facile (ΔG⧧ = 9.0 kcal/mol) than that via TS1 (ΔG⧧ = 24.0 kcal/mol). The reason for this observation is the attractive electrostatic interaction between the two oppositely charged A and A. The resulting two molecules of A are highly stable, laying at −108.3 kcal/mol with respect to starting A. Intermediate A, having two THF molecules coordinated to the Mg, is the most stable over other possibilities (see Figure S3 in the Supporting Information). The next step, metathesis of the Mg–O and B–H bonds, starts with the replacement of one THF of intermediate A by HBpin to generate A, a step endergonic by 3.4 kcal/mol (Figure ). Then the alkoxide group migrates to the boron atom via transition state TS3 and a total energy barrier of 5.6 kcal/mol from A. The resulting zwitterionic intermediate A is highly stable and is the lowest point in the potential energy surface. The reaction is completed by hydride transfer from the electron-rich HBpin moiety to the electron-deficient Mg center of A, via transition state TS4 and an energy barrier of 19.9 kcal/mol. Liberation of product P from the formed intermediate A regenerates A for further catalysis. The overall reaction profile (Figures and 2) reveals that bimetallic hydride transfer via TS1 is the rate-controlling step. Regarding the regioselectivity, we checked the two epoxide opening transition states TS1 and TS2. We thus investigated the hydride transfer step via TS1-R and via TS2-R, where hydride transfer occurs to the substituted C atom of the epoxide (red lines in Figure ). Consistent with the experimental regioselectivity, transition states TS1 and TS2 are favored by 5.2 and 3.8 kcal/mol as compared to transition states TS1-R and TS2-R (details in Figure S4 in the Supporting Information). The high regioselectivity toward H transfer to the unsubstituted C atom of the epoxide can be easily rationalized in terms of steric effects. In fact, the steric map of the epoxide coordinated intermediate A (Figure ) shows that, as expected, the western quadrants, hosting the unsubstituted C atom of the epoxide, are less hindered than the eastern ones, hosting the substituted C atom.[19]

Figure 3

Steric map of the epoxide-coordinated intermediate A. The percentage of buried volume is reported near each of the quadrants. For clarity, the 3D geometry of the coordinated epoxide is overlapped on the steric map. The scale of the steric contours is also reported. The middle point of the epoxide C–C bond is placed at the origin, and the epoxide O atom is placed on the Z-axis.

Steric map of the n class="Chemical">epoxide-coordinated intermediate A. The percentage of buried volume is reported near each of the quadrants. For clarity, the 3D geometry of the coordinated class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">epoxide is overlapped on the steric map. The scale of the steric contours is also reported. The middle point of the epoxide C–C bond is placed at the origin, and the epoxide O atom is placed on the Z-axis.

The catalytic pathway examined by the DFT calculations reveals an explicit role for the n class="Chemical">THF solvent molecules coordinated to class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">Mg. Therefore, we investigated the feasibility of this mechanism with a noncoordinating solvent, for example, toluene. In this case the starting Mg–H complex is A, in which two molecules of HBpin are bound to the Mg (Figure S5 in the Supporting Information). The resulting activation energy barrier for the hydride transfer step via TS1, 22.5 kcal/mol, is similar to that reported in Figure . Furthermore, hydride transfer to the substituted C atom of the epoxide, via transition state TS1-R, is unfavored by 2.3 kcal/mol relative to TS1. Thus, the proposed mechanism can be considered operative both in coordinating and noncoordinating solvents.

Mg(NTf2)2-Catalyzed Mechanism

Also in this case we started by analyzing the most stable form of the n class="Chemical">Mg(class="Chemical">pan class="Gene">NTf2)2 catalyst in the presence of substrate 1i and HBpin (for details, refer to Figure S6 in the Supporting Information). The complex B, having two THF molecules coordinated to the Mg atom, is found to be the most stable form and it is considered as the starting point of the reaction pathway. Different from the MgBu2-catalyzed mechanism, the formation of the Mg–H complex is unfeasible because of the very high endergonicity associated with the transfer of a hydride from HBpin to Mg (ΔG⧧ = 37.8 kcal/mol, Scheme S1 in the Supporting Information). Thus, for Mg(NTf2)2-catalyzed hydroboration we had to locate an alternative mechanism, devoid of a Mg–H intermediate. The overall reaction pathway is composed of two steps: isomerization of epoxide to aldehyde, followed by hydroboration of the aldehyde (Figure ).

Figure 4

Computed energy profile for the Mg(NTf2)2-catalyzed ring-opening hydroboration of epoxide. For energy convention refer to Figure .

Computed energy profile for the n class="Chemical">Mg(class="Chemical">pan class="Gene">NTf2)2-catalyzed ring-opening hydroboration of epoxide. For energy convention refer to Figure .

The reaction starts with the replacement of a n class="Chemical">THF in B by the class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">epoxide molecule 1i generating B, a step endergonic by 5.5 kcal/mol. The next step is ring opening of the epoxide by nucleophilic attack via the SN2-type transition state TS5 (Figure ). This step requires the overcoming of a free energy barrier of 29.2 kcal/mol from B and leads to the formation of the intermediate B, a charge-separated species. The high-energy intermediate B transforms rapidly to the aldehyde-coordinated species B via the 1,2-H transfer transition state TS6, with a negligible activation barrier (ΔG⧧ = 2.2 kcal/mol). Coordination of a THF molecule to B liberates the aldehyde 5 and regenerates B.

Hydroboration of the n class="Chemical">aldehyde starts with class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">HBpin insertion into one of the Mg−N(NTf2) bonds of B, via TS7 and a free energy barrier of 16.4 kcal/mol, to form intermediate B. One THF molecule of B is replaced by 5 to generate B, which is less stable than B by 4.3 kcal/mol. Hydride transfer from the electron rich HBpin in B to the coordinated C=O of 5, occurs via transition state TS8 and leads to intermediate B. This step requires the overcoming of an overall free energy span of 25.0 kcal/mol from the reference structures B. The next step is a barrier less and highly exergonic (ΔG = −35.0 kcal/mol) rearrangement of B to B, corresponding to nucleophilic transfer of the alkoxide group from magnesium to boron. The reaction is completed by release of product P, promoted by coordination of a THF molecule to Mg, via transition state TS9 and an energy barrier of 8.5 kcal/mol, regenerating the active catalyst B.

To rationalize the experimentally observed loss of enantioselectivity in the product, when the reaction is catalyzed by n class="Chemical">Mg(class="Chemical">pan class="Gene">NTf2)2, we investigated racemization (see Scheme ). The reaction starts with the Mg-coordinated alkoxide B, which is predicted to be the structure from which racemization starts. In B, the THF is coordinated to the cationic carbon, which is a chiral center. This THF can be replaced with another THF via SN2-type transition state. Therefore, an inversion of configuration is observed at the chiral center in the resulting intermediate, emerging a pathway toward the formation of enantiomer of P.

Scheme 6

Energetics for the Step of Racemization of Mg(NTf2)2-Catalyzed Reaction

Conclusions

In summary, a new n class="Chemical">magnesium-catalyzed protocol has been successfully applied to a wide range of terminal and internal class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">epoxides. Depending on the nature of the Mg catalyst, a regiodivergent ring opening is observed. Whereas MgBu2 provides the corresponding branched alcohol, Mg(NTf2)2, allows the formation of the linear regioisomer. To date, all transition-metal-catalyzed hydroborations of epoxides protocols provide the linear alcohol. In contrast, the use of readily available MgBu2 catalyzes the hydroboration of terminal and internal epoxides in excellent regioselectivities toward the branched isomer. Moreover, enantiopure alcohols can also be obtained as a result of the enantiospecific ring opening of optically pure epoxides. Besides, good efficiency is also observed when less reactive oxetanes are applied, which again result in the branched alcohols in good yields and with excellent regioselectivities. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first selective hydroboration of these unreactive compounds. Also, the use of readily available Mg(NTf2)2, containing trifluoromethanesulfonimide ligands, provides the linear isomer when 2,2-disubstituted terminal epoxides were tested.

By means of control experiments and DFT calculations, we demonstrate that the different activation modes of n class="Chemical">HBpin are crucial for the regiodivergency observed. Mechanistically, for the class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">MgBu2-catalyzed procedure a bimolecular ring-opening mechanism is proposed in which the epoxide activation and the hydride addition to the least substituted carbon occur simultaneously, providing the corresponding branched alcohols. Also, the Lewis acid Mg(NTf2)2 facilitates the ring opening of epoxides via an isomerization pathway to give the corresponding aldehyde, which subsequently undergoes hydroboration through a dual magnesium-ligand cooperative HBpin activation. Because of the mild reaction conditions, the use of readily available and nontoxic catalysts, the good chemo-, regio-, and stereoselectivities obtained for a wide range of epoxides, the catalytic system presented can be considered a green alternative to the existing ring-opening protocols and may be further applied to late-stage functionalizations.