| Literature DB >> 32655673 |
Jia Jing1, Yingjin Wang2, Yanmei Quan1, Zhijie Wang2, Yue Liu1, Zhide Ding1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To determine if overweight/obese pregnant women have altered microRNA expression patterns in fetal umbilical cord blood that may affect the development of offspring.Entities:
Keywords: Epigenetics; Fetus; Obesity; Umbilical cord blood; microRNAs
Year: 2020 PMID: 32655673 PMCID: PMC7339545 DOI: 10.1186/s12986-020-00475-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) ISSN: 1743-7075 Impact factor: 4.169
Differences in clinical characteristics of pregnant women between control and overweight/obese groups
| Subject characteristic | Control | Overweight/obesity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pregestational BMI, kg/m2 | 21.28 ± 0.28 | 28.83 ± 0.55 | < 0.001 |
| Weight gain during pregnancy, kg | 12.66 ± 1.04 | 13.61 ± 0.95 | 0.51 |
| Maternal age, years | 28.88 ± 0.65 | 29.47 ± 0.55 | 0.33 |
| Cesarean delivery, n (%) | 5 (16) | 7 (20) | 0.60 |
| Cohort size NGS | 7 | 9 | |
| Cohort size RT-qPCR | 25 | 25 |
All parameters are expressed as n (%) or mean ± SEM. Student’s t-test (parametric continuous data) or Mann–Whitney’s U-test (nonparametric continuous data) determined significance of differences between the two groups. The chi-square test analyzed categorical data including cesarean delivery. P value of < 0.05 was considered significant. BMI body mass index
Fig. 1Comparison of newborn parameters between control and overweight/obese groups. a Numbers of male and female newborns in each group. NS: no significant difference. b Comparison of newborn weight between control and overweight/obese groups (n = 32, respectively). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. c There is a positive correlation between newborn weight and the maternal pregestational BMI during pregnancy. (Pearson correlation coefficient, r = 0.48, P = 0.0002, n = 60). (**P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001)
Fig. 2Analysis of differential miRNA expression in overweight/obesity and control groups. a Volcano plot illustrates the expression of different miRNAs detected by NGS. Purple dots represent up-regulated miRNAs and blue dots represent down-regulated miRNA with significant differential expression in overweight/obese pregnant group vs control group (|Log2| ≥ 1, Q value ≤0.001), and yellow dots represent genes with no significant difference. b The numbers of known as well as novel miRNAs that are either upregulated or downregulated and significantly different from one another
Fig. 3Bioinformatic analysis of differentially expressed miRNAs’ target genes. a GO analysis including molecular functions, cellular components and biological processes and b KEGG pathway analysis was performed on target genes of differentially expressed miRNAs between the control and overweight/obese groups. X axis represents numbers of target genes, and Y axis represents functional categories. c Scatter plot of KEGG pathway enrichment. X axis represents the enrichment factor, and Y axis represents the pathway items. The circle sizes are proportional with the number of genes, and their colors represent the significance (Q value: adjusted P value)
Fig. 4C19MC microRNAs were upregulated in the fetal umbilical cord blood of the overweight/obese groups. qRT-PCR validated the identity of eight differentially expressed C19MC miRNAs in NGS analysis. Values are reported as mean ± SEM. The results document that the relative gene expression levels of five C19MC microRNAs that are significantly up-regulated in the overweight/obese pregnant groups (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; n = 25, respectively)
GO analysis of predicted target genes of five validated C19MC miRNAs
| Subcategory | GO name | numbers | Targeted mRNA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| positive regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity | GO:0043552 | 15 | 0.0005 | CCR7, FGR, SRC, TNFAIP8L3, ATG14, ERBB4, FGFR3, FLT1, IRS1, PDGFB, PTK2B, PTK2, TGFB1, VAV2, VAV3 |
| post-embryonic development | GO:0009791 | 22 | 0.017 | ALX4, MORC3, PLAGL2, PRDM1, SMAD2, SOX6, TAL2, TIPARP, ACVR2B, ALDH5A1, AGO2, CHST11, EMX1, GABRG2, HEG1, ITPR1, IMPAD1, KMT2A, PYGO1, SZT2, SELENOP, SOD2 |
| memory | GO:0007613 | 19 | 0.023 | HTR2A, CHRFAM7A, NTAN1, SHANK2, CNR1, DRD1, EIF4EBP2, FEN1, HRH1, HRH2, ITGA3, KALRN, PAK5, PLA2G6, PLCB1, KCNK10, KCNK4, PPP3CB, SLC6A4, |
| response to hydrogen peroxide | GO:0042542 | 16 | 0.032 | BAK1, SRC, CASP3, DUSP1, GLRX2, GPX1, HP, HMOX1, MB, NR4A3, PPP1R15B, PTK2B, STK25, STAT1, SOD2, SDC |
| T cell differentiation | GO:0030217 | 11 | 0.033 | CD3D, SOX4, SP3, CHD7, IL7R, NHEJ1, PREX1, PIK3CD, PPP3CB, PTPN2, PTPN22 |
| glucose homeostasis | GO:0042593 | 27 | 0.034 | ALMS1, CSMD1, HECTD4, HNF1A, SOX4, VGF, ADIPOR2, CNR1, CAV3, CRY1, CRY2, DHPS, FBN1, HNF4A, HIF1A, INPP5K, IRS1, INSR, NEUROD1, PRCP, PRKAA1, PRKAA2, PTPN2, RBP4, SLC2A4, SLC8B1, TCF7L2 |
| MAPK cascade | GO:0000165 | 60 | 0.038 | BRAP, CCL5, FYN, JAK1, NDST1, RASGRP3, RASGRP4, RASA1, RASA2, RAF1, RASGEF1A, SHC3, ACTN2, CAMK2B, CAMK2D, CAMKK2, CALM3, CSF2RA, CSF2RB, DOK4, DOK5, DUSP5, DUSP7, EGFR, EREG, ERBB3, ERBB4, FGF19, FGF7, FGFR3, GRB2, ITPKB, IRS1, IL17RD, IL2RB, IL31RA, KLB, LRRK2, MAPK4, MAPK8IP2, MAPKAPK3, MEF2D, NRG1, NF1, PDGFB, PSMD1, PSMD5, PSME3, PSME4, PSMA2, PSMB4, PTK2B, PTK2, RET, SPTA1, SPTB, SPTBN1, SPRED1, TGFB1, MYC |
| nervous system development | GO:0007399 | 67 | 0.038 | MTR, DGCR14, GPSM1, RFNG, RBM45, ARHGEF7, SMARCC1, WNT8B, ZIC5, ATXN10, ATXN3, CHRM2, CHRM3, CHRDL1, CPLX2, CRIM1, DPYSL5, DOK4, DOK5, DYRK1A, EDNRB, ERBB4, FEZ1, FEZ2, FGF19, FUT10, FKTN, GBX2, GMFB, GRIK1, GPM6B, GAS7, HDAC4, IGSF9B, INSC, KALRN, LSAMP, MPPED2, MARK4, MAP1B, MBNL1, MEF2D, NRG1, NLGN1, NAV2, NR2E1, PRPS1, PCSK2, PPP2R5D, PCDHA10, PCDHA11, PCDHA2, PCDHA4, PCDHA5, PCDHA8, SEMA6A, SRRM4, SHOX2, SIGMAR1, SCN8A, TSHR, TMEM41B, TPP1, TMOD2, ZEB2, |
Gene names and their numbers of predicted target mRNAs are listed in each GO subcategory. P value of < 0.05 was considered significant