Literature DB >> 32653457

Update on Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Study Protocols: The Better Way to Design and Report Clinical Trials.

Kenneth J Hoffer1, Giacomo Savini2.   

Abstract

It was almost 40 years ago when one of the authors (K.J.H.) published an organized system to quantify the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas, methods, and instruments. At the behest of the editor of the American Journal of Ophthalmology, the IOL Power Club (along with a statistician) published an editorial in 2015 modernizing and quantifying the proper protocols for these studies. Over the past decade, so many new optical biometers, formulas, and methods (whose accuracies have yet to be completely tested) have been introduced that we were asked to modernize and update these guidelines yet again to help others design and report correctly the results of clinical studies on IOL power calculation and biometry for 2020. We evaluated guidelines to enroll patients, including visual acuity minimums, exclusion of bilateral eyes, sample size issues, demographics (age, gender, and ethnicity), and whether such studies should not be performed using the same data that were used to develop the formula being tested. We showed the absolute need for constant optimization, which formulas should be tested for comparison, refraction measurement (testing distance), as well as the analysis of the prediction error (median and mean absolute errors; standard deviation; range of errors; percentage of eyes with a prediction within ±0.25 diopter [D], ±0.50 D, ±0.75 D, and ±1.00 D; and interquartile displays) and statistical methods of analyses. We present methods of ranking formula accuracy, including the new Haigis IOL Formula Performance Index. We also point out the issues of who programmed the formulas being tested, that all formulas used in the study must be referenced, and the software version number of all instruments used in the study should be stated clearly. The definition of anterior chamber depth should be stated as measured from the corneal epithelium to the lens. We hope that these recommendations will help researchers to improve the validity and accuracy of their studies with the ultimate goal to improve the accuracy of IOL power calculation.
Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Year:  2020        PMID: 32653457     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of IOL power calculation with the Kane formula for pediatric cataract surgery.

Authors:  Uri Elbaz; Ruti Sella; Olga Reitblat; Sina Khalili; Asim Ali; Kamiar Mireskandari; Yakov Vega; Raimo Tuuminen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  Lower refractive prediction accuracy of total keratometry using intraocular lens formulas loaded onto a swept-source optical biometer.

Authors:  Yukitaka Danjo; Reina Ohji; Sayo Maeno
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 3.535

3.  Refractive outcomes of scleral-sutured posterior chamber intraocular lenses in post-traumatic eyes.

Authors:  Wenlong Wei; Haishuang Lin; Xuanli Zheng; Siyi Wang; Shengsheng Bai; Zhenquan Zhao
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 2.029

4.  Evaluation of the Nallasamy formula: a stacking ensemble machine learning method for refraction prediction in cataract surgery.

Authors:  Tingyang Li; Joshua Stein; Nambi Nallasamy
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 5.908

5.  Reply to Cione et al. Comment on "Iida et al. Development of a New Method for Calculating Intraocular Lens Power after Myopic Laser In Situ Keratomileusis by Combining the Anterior-Posterior Ratio of the Corneal Radius of the Curvature with the Double-K Method. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 522".

Authors:  Yoshihiko Iida; Kimiya Shimizu; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Changes in the Ocular Parameters of Patients with Graves' Disease after Antithyroid Drug Treatment.

Authors:  Je-Sang Lee; Dong-Ju Yeom; Seung-Kwan Nah; Bo-Yeon Kim; Sun-Young Jang
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison Study.

Authors:  Diogo Hipólito-Fernandes; Maria Elisa Luís; Pedro Gil; Vitor Maduro; João Feijão; Tun Kuan Yeo; Oleksiy Voytsekhivskyy; Nuno Alves
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-16

8.  Prediction Error Stabilization and Long-Term Standard Results with a Monofocal Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Beatríz Macías-Murelaga; Gonzaga Garay-Aramburu; Roberto Bergado-Mijangos; Daniel Coello-Ojeda; Itziar Ozaeta; Pio Jésus Garcia-Gómez; Jesús Garrido-Fierro; Manuel Rodríguez-Vallejo; Joaquín Fernández
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-13

9.  Optimizing lens constants specifically for short eyes: Is it essential?

Authors:  Ankur K Shrivastava; Swatishree Nayak; Ashish Mahobia; Mary Anto; Rajaram Kacher; Ajay Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome.

Authors:  Aleksandra Wlaź; Agnieszka Kustra; Agnieszka Rozegnał-Madej; Tomasz Żarnowski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.