James N Ingle1, Krishna R Kalari2, Poulami Barman2, Lois E Shepherd3, Matthew J Ellis4, Paul E Goss5, Aman U Buzdar6, Mark E Robson7, Junmei Cairns8, Erin E Carlson2, Abraham Eyman Casey2, Tanya L Hoskin2, Barbara A Goodnature9, Tufia C Haddad1, Matthew P Goetz1, Richard M Weinshilboum2, Liewei Wang2. 1. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology. 2. Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 3. Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. 4. Department of Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 5. Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Department of Breast Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 7. Breast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 8. Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic. 9. Patient advocate, Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer Specialized Program of Research Excellence, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Based on our previous findings that postmenopausal women with estrone (E1) and estradiol (E2) concentrations at or above 1.3 pg/ml and 0.5 pg/ml, respectively, after 6 months of adjuvant anastrozole therapy had a three-fold risk of recurrence, we aimed to identify a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based model that would predict elevated E1 and E2 and then validate it in an independent dataset. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The test set consisted of 322 women from the M3 study and the validation set consisted of 152 patients from MA.27. All patients were treated with adjuvant anastrozole, had on-anastrozole E1 and E2 concentrations and genome-wide genotyping. RESULTS: SNPs were identified from the M3 genome-wide association study. The best model to predict the E1-E2 phenotype with high balanced accuracy was a support vector machine model using clinical factors plus 46 SNPs. We did not have an independent cohort that is similar to the M3 study with clinical, E1-E2 phenotypes and genotype data to test our model. Hence, we chose a nested matched case-control cohort (MA.27 study) for testing. Our E1-E2 model was not validated but we found the MA.27 validation cohort was both clinically and genomically different. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a SNP-based model that had excellent performance characteristics for predicting the phenotype of elevated E1 and E2 in women treated with anastrozole. This model was not validated in an independent dataset but that dataset was clinically and genomically substantially different. The model will need validation in a prospective study.
OBJECTIVES: Based on our previous findings that postmenopausal women with estrone (E1) and estradiol (E2) concentrations at or above 1.3 pg/ml and 0.5 pg/ml, respectively, after 6 months of adjuvant anastrozole therapy had a three-fold risk of recurrence, we aimed to identify a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based model that would predict elevated E1 and E2 and then validate it in an independent dataset. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The test set consisted of 322 women from the M3 study and the validation set consisted of 152 patients from MA.27. All patients were treated with adjuvant anastrozole, had on-anastrozole E1 and E2 concentrations and genome-wide genotyping. RESULTS: SNPs were identified from the M3 genome-wide association study. The best model to predict the E1-E2 phenotype with high balanced accuracy was a support vector machine model using clinical factors plus 46 SNPs. We did not have an independent cohort that is similar to the M3 study with clinical, E1-E2 phenotypes and genotype data to test our model. Hence, we chose a nested matched case-control cohort (MA.27 study) for testing. Our E1-E2 model was not validated but we found the MA.27 validation cohort was both clinically and genomically different. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a SNP-based model that had excellent performance characteristics for predicting the phenotype of elevated E1 and E2 in women treated with anastrozole. This model was not validated in an independent dataset but that dataset was clinically and genomically substantially different. The model will need validation in a prospective study.
Authors: Paul E Goss; James N Ingle; José E Alés-Martínez; Angela M Cheung; Rowan T Chlebowski; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Anne McTiernan; John Robbins; Karen C Johnson; Lisa W Martin; Eric Winquist; Gloria E Sarto; Judy E Garber; Carol J Fabian; Pascal Pujol; Elizabeth Maunsell; Patricia Farmer; Karen A Gelmon; Dongsheng Tu; Harriet Richardson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alkes L Price; Michael E Weale; Nick Patterson; Simon R Myers; Anna C Need; Kevin V Shianna; Dongliang Ge; Jerome I Rotter; Esther Torres; Kent D Taylor; David B Goldstein; David Reich Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: James N Ingle; Junmei Cairns; Vera J Suman; Lois E Shepherd; Peter A Fasching; Tanya L Hoskin; Ravinder J Singh; Zeruesenay Desta; Krishna R Kalari; Matthew J Ellis; Paul E Goss; Bingshu E Chen; Bernhard Volz; Poulami Barman; Erin E Carlson; Tufia Haddad; Matthew P Goetz; Barbara Goodnature; Matthew E Cuellar; Michael A Walters; Cristina Correia; Scott H Kaufmann; Richard M Weinshilboum; Liewei Wang Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-02-25 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Paul E Goss; James N Ingle; Kathleen I Pritchard; Matthew J Ellis; George W Sledge; G Thomas Budd; Manuela Rabaglio; Rafat H Ansari; David B Johnson; Richard Tozer; David P D'Souza; Haji Chalchal; Silvana Spadafora; Vered Stearns; Edith A Perez; Pedro E R Liedke; Istvan Lang; Catherine Elliott; Karen A Gelmon; Judy-Anne W Chapman; Lois E Shepherd Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-01-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: James N Ingle; Krishna R Kalari; Aman U Buzdar; Mark E Robson; Matthew P Goetz; Zeruesenay Desta; Poulami Barman; Tanda T Dudenkov; Donald W Northfelt; Edith A Perez; David A Flockhart; Clark V Williard; Liewei Wang; Richard M Weinshilboum Journal: Steroids Date: 2014-08-24 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: Jack Cuzick; Ivana Sestak; John F Forbes; Mitch Dowsett; Jill Knox; Simon Cawthorn; Christobel Saunders; Nicola Roche; Robert E Mansel; Gunter von Minckwitz; Bernardo Bonanni; Tiina Palva; Anthony Howell Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 79.321