James Russell1, Milan Grkovski1, Isabella J O'Donoghue1, Teja M Kalidindi2, Nagavarakishore Pillarsetty2, Eva M Burnazi3, Amanda Kulick4, Amber Bahr4, Qing Chang4, H Carl LeKaye1, Elisa de Stanchina4, Kenneth H Yu5, John L Humm6. 1. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 2. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 3. Radiochemistry and Molecular Imaging Probe Core Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 4. Anti-Tumor Assessment Core Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and. 5. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 6. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York hummj@mkscc.org.
Abstract
18F-FAC (2'-deoxy-2'-18F-fluoro-β-d-arabinofuranosylcytosine) has close structural similarity to gemcitabine and thus offers the potential to image drug delivery to tumors. We compared tumor 18F-FAC PET images with 14C-gemcitabine levels, established ex vivo, in 3 mouse models of pancreatic cancer. We further modified tumor gemcitabine levels with injectable PEGylated recombinant human hyaluronidase (PEGPH20) to test whether changes in gemcitabine would be tracked by 18F-FAC. Methods: 18F-FAC was synthesized as described previously. Three patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models were grown in the flanks of NSG mice. Mice were given PEGPH20 or vehicle intravenously 24 h before coinjection of 18F-FAC and 14C-gemcitabine. Animals were euthanized and imaged 1 h after tracer administration. Tumor and muscle uptake of both 18F-FAC and 14C-gemcitabine was obtained ex vivo. The efficacy of PEPGPH20 was validated through staining with hyaluronic acid binding protein. Additionally, an organoid culture, initiated from a KPC (Pdx-1 Cre LSL-KrasG12D LSL-p53R172H) tumor, was used to generate orthotopically growing tumors in C57BL/6J mice, and these tumors were then serially transplanted. Animals were injected with PEGPH20 and 14C-gemcitabine as described above to validate increased drug uptake by ex vivo assay. PET/MR images were obtained using a PET insert on a 7-T MR scanner. Animals were imaged immediately before injection with PEGPH20 and again 24 h later. Results: Tumor-to-muscle ratios of 14C-gemcitabine and 18F-FAC correlated well across all PDX models and treatments (R2 = 0.78). There was a significant increase in the tumor PET signal in PEGPH20-treated PDX animals, and this signal was matched in ex vivo counts for 2 of 3 models. In KPC-derived tumors, PEGPH20 raised 14C-gemcitabine levels (tumor-to-muscle ratio of 1.9 vs. 2.4, control vs. treated, P = 0.013). PET/MR 18F-FAC images showed a 12% increase in tumor 18F-FAC uptake after PEGPH20 treatment (P = 0.023). PEGPH20-treated animals uniformly displayed clear reductions in hyaluronic acid staining. Conclusion: 18F-FAC PET was shown to be a good surrogate for gemcitabine uptake and, when combined with MR, to successfully determine drug uptake in tumors growing in the pancreas. PEGPH20 had moderate effects on tumor uptake of gemcitabine.
18F-FAC (2'-deoxy-2'-18F-fluoro-β-d-arabinofuranosylcytosine) has close structural similarity to gemcitabine and thus offers the potential to image drug delivery to tumors. We compared tumor 18F-FAC PET images with 14C-gemcitabine levels, established ex vivo, in 3 mouse models of pancreatic cancer. We further modified tumor gemcitabine levels with injectable PEGylated recombinant human hyaluronidase (PEGPH20) to test whether changes in gemcitabine would be tracked by 18F-FAC. Methods: 18F-FAC was synthesized as described previously. Three patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models were grown in the flanks of NSG mice. Mice were given PEGPH20 or vehicle intravenously 24 h before coinjection of 18F-FAC and 14C-gemcitabine. Animals were euthanized and imaged 1 h after tracer administration. Tumor and muscle uptake of both 18F-FAC and 14C-gemcitabine was obtained ex vivo. The efficacy of PEPGPH20 was validated through staining with hyaluronic acid binding protein. Additionally, an organoid culture, initiated from a KPC (Pdx-1 Cre LSL-KrasG12D LSL-p53R172H) tumor, was used to generate orthotopically growing tumors in C57BL/6J mice, and these tumors were then serially transplanted. Animals were injected with PEGPH20 and 14C-gemcitabine as described above to validate increased drug uptake by ex vivo assay. PET/MR images were obtained using a PET insert on a 7-T MR scanner. Animals were imaged immediately before injection with PEGPH20 and again 24 h later. Results: Tumor-to-muscle ratios of 14C-gemcitabine and 18F-FAC correlated well across all PDX models and treatments (R2 = 0.78). There was a significant increase in the tumor PET signal in PEGPH20-treated PDX animals, and this signal was matched in ex vivo counts for 2 of 3 models. In KPC-derived tumors, PEGPH20 raised 14C-gemcitabine levels (tumor-to-muscle ratio of 1.9 vs. 2.4, control vs. treated, P = 0.013). PET/MR 18F-FAC images showed a 12% increase in tumor 18F-FAC uptake after PEGPH20 treatment (P = 0.023). PEGPH20-treated animals uniformly displayed clear reductions in hyaluronic acid staining. Conclusion: 18F-FAC PET was shown to be a good surrogate for gemcitabine uptake and, when combined with MR, to successfully determine drug uptake in tumors growing in the pancreas. PEGPH20 had moderate effects on tumor uptake of gemcitabine.
Authors: Ciprian Catana; Yibao Wu; Martin S Judenhofer; Jinyi Qi; Bernd J Pichler; Simon R Cherry Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Thierry Conroy; Pascal Hammel; Mohamed Hebbar; Meher Ben Abdelghani; Alice C Wei; Jean-Luc Raoul; Laurence Choné; Eric Francois; Pascal Artru; James J Biagi; Thierry Lecomte; Eric Assenat; Roger Faroux; Marc Ychou; Julien Volet; Alain Sauvanet; Gilles Breysacher; Frédéric Di Fiore; Christine Cripps; Petr Kavan; Patrick Texereau; Karine Bouhier-Leporrier; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Jean-Louis Legoux; Béata Juzyna; Sophie Gourgou; Christopher J O'Callaghan; Claire Jouffroy-Zeller; Patrick Rat; David Malka; Florence Castan; Jean-Baptiste Bachet Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ralph H Hruban; Matthias M Gaida; Elizabeth Thompson; Seung-Mo Hong; Michaël Noë; Lodewijk Aa Brosens; Martine Jongepier; G Johan A Offerhaus; Laura D Wood Journal: J Pathol Date: 2019-04-15 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Paolo P Provenzano; Carlos Cuevas; Amy E Chang; Vikas K Goel; Daniel D Von Hoff; Sunil R Hingorani Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2012-03-20 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Rachel E Laing; Martin A Walter; Dean O Campbell; Harvey R Herschman; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Michael E Phelps; Johannes Czernin; Owen N Witte; Caius G Radu Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-02-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Johannes Schwarzenberg; Caius G Radu; Matthias Benz; Barbara Fueger; Andrew Q Tran; Michael E Phelps; Owen N Witte; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Johannes Czernin; Christiaan Schiepers Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-12-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Pascal Belleau; Dannielle D Engle; Hervé Tiriac; Dennis Plenker; Astrid Deschênes; Tim D D Somerville; Fieke E M Froeling; Richard A Burkhart; Robert E Denroche; Gun-Ho Jang; Koji Miyabayashi; C Megan Young; Hardik Patel; Michelle Ma; Joseph F LaComb; Randze Lerie D Palmaira; Ammar A Javed; Jasmine C Huynh; Molly Johnson; Kanika Arora; Nicolas Robine; Minita Shah; Rashesh Sanghvi; Austin B Goetz; Cinthya Y Lowder; Laura Martello; Else Driehuis; Nicolas LeComte; Gokce Askan; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Hans Clevers; Laura D Wood; Ralph H Hruban; Elizabeth Thompson; Andrew J Aguirre; Brian M Wolpin; Aaron Sasson; Joseph Kim; Maoxin Wu; Juan Carlos Bucobo; Peter Allen; Divyesh V Sejpal; William Nealon; James D Sullivan; Jordan M Winter; Phyllis A Gimotty; Jean L Grem; Dominick J DiMaio; Jonathan M Buscaglia; Paul M Grandgenett; Jonathan R Brody; Michael A Hollingsworth; Grainne M O'Kane; Faiyaz Notta; Edward Kim; James M Crawford; Craig Devoe; Allyson Ocean; Christopher L Wolfgang; Kenneth H Yu; Ellen Li; Christopher R Vakoc; Benjamin Hubert; Sandra E Fischer; Julie M Wilson; Richard Moffitt; Jennifer Knox; Alexander Krasnitz; Steven Gallinger; David A Tuveson Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 38.272
Authors: Louise M Fanchon; James Russell; Nagavarakishore Pillarsetty; Isabella O'Donoghue; Kishore Gangangari; Kenneth H Yu; John L Humm Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Kenneth L Pitter; Olivera Grbovic-Huezo; Simon Joost; Anupriya Singhal; Melissa Blum; Katherine Wu; Matilda Holm; Alexander Ferrena; Arjun Bhutkar; Anna Hudson; Nicolas Lecomte; Elisa de Stanchina; Ronan Chaligne; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Dana Pe'er; Tuomas Tammela Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2022-10-04 Impact factor: 13.312
Authors: James Russell; Louise Fanchon; Hanan Alwaseem; Henrik Molina; Isabella O'Donoghue; Amber Bahr; Elisa de Stanchina; Nagavarakishore Pillarsetty; John L Humm Journal: Pharmacol Res Perspect Date: 2022-04