Literature DB >> 32641879

Clinical and radiographic outcomes with the Nanos™ short-stem hip implant at 24 months: A prospective, single-center study.

Stefan Budde1, Michael Schwarze2, Thilo Floerkemeier1, Jochen Plagge1, Nils Wirries1, Henning Windhagen1, Fritz Thorey3, Alexander Derksen1.   

Abstract

AIM: Short-stem total hip arthroplasty is designed to preserve proximal bone stock in case of eventual revision, potentially benefiting younger and more active patients. This prospective, single-center study assessed the safety and performance of the partially neck-sparing Nanos™ short-stem uncemented prosthesis at 24 months using clinical outcome scores and radiographic results.
METHODS: Between April 2011 and February 2015, 52 subjects (mean age, 54.9 years) underwent total hip arthroplasty and were followed up at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. The primary outcome was improvement in quality of life as measured by the Short-Form 36 Mental Component Score (SF-36 MCS). Secondary clinical outcomes included the Harris Hip Score, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Postel Merle d'Aubigné-Score, Activity Level University of California, Los Angeles score, and Pain Visual Analogue Scale. Complications and radiographic images were also recorded at each follow-up.
RESULTS: Mean SF-36 MCS score significantly improved from baseline to final follow up at 24 months (61.3 vs. 79.5, respectively; p < 0.001). All secondary clinical outcomes also showed significant improvement (p < 0.001) during this time period. Neutral stem positioning was achieved in 45 subjects (86.5%). Two subjects (3.8%) underwent revisions: one for a periprosthetic fracture unrelated to the study device and another due to a prosthetic joint infection. Intraoperatively, one fissure fracture of the acetabulum occurred.
CONCLUSION: Total hip arthroplasty with the Nanos short-stem led to significant clinical improvements and a high subjective satisfaction rate at 24 months. Further follow-up will determine whether these effects are sustained in the long term.
© 2020 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient-reported outcomes; Quality of life; Short stem; Total hip arthroplasty; Uncemented

Year:  2020        PMID: 32641879      PMCID: PMC7330422          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  29 in total

1.  Poor bone quality or hip structure as risk factors affecting survival of total-hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  S Kobayashi; N Saito; H Horiuchi; R Iorio; K Takaoka
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-04-29       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis.

Authors:  R M D'AUBIGNE; M POSTEL
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1954-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Analysis of migration of the Nanos® short-stem hip implant within two years after surgery.

Authors:  Stefan Budde; Frank Seehaus; Michael Schwarze; Christof Hurschler; Thilo Floerkemeier; Henning Windhagen; Yvonne Noll; Max Ettinger; Fritz Thorey
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Periprosthetic femoral fracture within two years after total hip replacement: analysis of 437,629 operations in the nordic arthroplasty register association database.

Authors:  Truike M Thien; Georgios Chatziagorou; Göran Garellick; Ove Furnes; Leif I Havelin; Keijo Mäkelä; Søren Overgaard; Alma Pedersen; Antti Eskelinen; Pekka Pulkkinen; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Influence of varus/valgus positioning of the Nanos® and Metha® short-stemmed prostheses on stress shielding of metaphyseal bone.

Authors:  V Brinkmann; F Radetzki; N Gutteck; S Delank; A Zeh
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 0.500

7.  Deep infection after total hip replacement: a method for national incidence surveillance.

Authors:  Viktor Lindgren; Max Gordon; Per Wretenberg; Johan Kärrholm; Göran Garellick
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.254

8.  Long-term follow-up of total hip replacement in patients with osteonecrosis.

Authors:  C N Cornell; E A Salvati; P M Pellicci
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  H C Amstutz; B J Thomas; R Jinnah; W Kim; T Grogan; C Yale
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Prospective mid-term results of a consecutive series of a short stem.

Authors:  N Stadler; J Lehner; R Abbas; K Trieb
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 0.500

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes after total hip arthroplasty with the NANOS neck preserving hip stem: a 10 to 16-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Vincenzo De Santis; Nadia Bonfiglio; Mattia Basilico; Greta Tanzi Germani; Maria Rosaria Matrangolo; Angelo Carosini; Giuseppe Malerba; Giulio Maccauro
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.362

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.