Andres Rezuc1, Christian Saavedra2, Rodrigo Maass3, Cristian Poblete4, Christian Nappe5. 1. Mayor University, School of Dentistry, Santiago, Chile, Av. Libertador Bernardo O'Higgins 2013, Santiago, 8320000, Santiago, Chile. 2. San Sebastian University, Faculty of Dentistry, Puerto Montt, Chile, Lago Panguipulli, 1390, Puerto Montt, Los Lagos, Chile. 3. Diego Portales University, Faculty of Medicine, Santiago, Chile, Av. Ejército Libertador 141, Santiago, 8370007, Santiago, Chile. 4. Mayor University, School of Medical Technology, Santiago, Chile, Camino La Pirámide 5750, Huechuraba. 8580745. Santiago, Chile. 5. Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Faculty of Medicine, School of Dentistry, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Macul, 7820436, Santiago, Chile.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To histologically evaluate the use of bovine derived deproteinized xenograft (DBBM), leukocyte and platelet rich fibrin (L-PRF) and the combination of both in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) performed in non-critical size defects in rabbit. METHODS: A prospective experimental study was performed. Four bone defects in the tibiae of 12 rabbits were made and each of them was filled with DBBM, L-PRF, a combination of DBBM + L-PRF or was left to heal as control site. All defects were covered with a collagen membrane. Rabbits were randomly distributed in three groups and euthanatized at 3, 6 or 9 weeks. Samples were obtained and histologically analyzed to determine vital bone, connective tissue and remaining graft particles percentage. Analysis of variance, Kruskal Wallis and non-paired t-test where used to evaluate the significance of the results. RESULTS: At 3 weeks of healing, DBBM showed significantly more vital bone percentage than L-PRF (p = 0,05) and DBBM + L-PRF showed significantly less connective tissue than control (p < 0,05). All other groups showed no statistical difference between them. At 6 weeks of healing, DBBM showed significantly more vital bone percentage than L-PRF (p < 0,05), DBBM + L-PRF (p < 0,05) and control (p < 0,05) and there wasn't any other significant difference regarding to connective tissue or remaining particle percentage between groups. At t 9 weeks healing period, there weren't any significant differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: DBBM seems to enhance vital bone formation at early healing stages. The use of L-PRF alone or combined with DBBM, didn't show any histological improvement regarding to vital bone formation. The use of DBBM, alone or in conjunction with L-PRF showed a trend to reduce connective tissue percentage. The use of L-PRF combined with DBBM didn't affect the remaining particle percentage.
PURPOSE: To histologically evaluate the use of bovine derived deproteinized xenograft (DBBM), leukocyte and platelet rich fibrin (L-PRF) and the combination of both in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) performed in non-critical size defects in rabbit. METHODS: A prospective experimental study was performed. Four bone defects in the tibiae of 12 rabbits were made and each of them was filled with DBBM, L-PRF, a combination of DBBM + L-PRF or was left to heal as control site. All defects were covered with a collagen membrane. Rabbits were randomly distributed in three groups and euthanatized at 3, 6 or 9 weeks. Samples were obtained and histologically analyzed to determine vital bone, connective tissue and remaining graft particles percentage. Analysis of variance, Kruskal Wallis and non-paired t-test where used to evaluate the significance of the results. RESULTS: At 3 weeks of healing, DBBM showed significantly more vital bone percentage than L-PRF (p = 0,05) and DBBM + L-PRF showed significantly less connective tissue than control (p < 0,05). All other groups showed no statistical difference between them. At 6 weeks of healing, DBBM showed significantly more vital bone percentage than L-PRF (p < 0,05), DBBM + L-PRF (p < 0,05) and control (p < 0,05) and there wasn't any other significant difference regarding to connective tissue or remaining particle percentage between groups. At t 9 weeks healing period, there weren't any significant differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: DBBM seems to enhance vital bone formation at early healing stages. The use of L-PRF alone or combined with DBBM, didn't show any histological improvement regarding to vital bone formation. The use of DBBM, alone or in conjunction with L-PRF showed a trend to reduce connective tissue percentage. The use of L-PRF combined with DBBM didn't affect the remaining particle percentage.
Authors: David M Dohan; Joseph Choukroun; Antoine Diss; Steve L Dohan; Anthony J J Dohan; Jaafar Mouhyi; Bruno Gogly Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Date: 2006-01-19
Authors: Richard J Miron; Giovanni Zucchelli; Michael A Pikos; Maurice Salama; Samuel Lee; Vincent Guillemette; Masako Fujioka-Kobayashi; Mark Bishara; Yufeng Zhang; Hom-Lay Wang; Fatiha Chandad; Cleopatra Nacopoulos; Alain Simonpieri; Alexandre Amir Aalam; Pietro Felice; Gilberto Sammartino; Shahram Ghanaati; Maria A Hernandez; Joseph Choukroun Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2017-05-27 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: P Dragonas; T Katsaros; G Avila-Ortiz; L Chambrone; J H Schiavo; A Palaiologou Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2018-07-07 Impact factor: 2.789
Authors: Johannes Schindelin; Ignacio Arganda-Carreras; Erwin Frise; Verena Kaynig; Mark Longair; Tobias Pietzsch; Stephan Preibisch; Curtis Rueden; Stephan Saalfeld; Benjamin Schmid; Jean-Yves Tinevez; Daniel James White; Volker Hartenstein; Kevin Eliceiri; Pavel Tomancak; Albert Cardona Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Mauricio G Araújo; João Carlos Costa da Silva; Arthur Furtado de Mendonça; Jan Lindhe Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 5.977