Ian G Hargraves1, Alaina K Fournier2, Victor M Montori3, Arlene S Bierman2. 1. Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester USA. Electronic address: Hargraves.Ian@mayo.edu. 2. Center for Evidence and Practice Improvement of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA. 3. Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester USA; Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Generalized shared decision making (SDM) describes the involvement of patients in choosing options. However, there are many situations in which patients and clinicians make decisions together that don't focus on choosing between options, e.g. problem-solving dialysis and insulin use while traveling. Poor uptake associated with clinicians' perception that SDM doesn't apply to clinical situations they face may reflect the lack of adaptation of generalized SDM approaches to patients' problems. The Purposeful SDM schema published in 2019 identifies problems for which different kinds of SDM are appropriate. METHODS: The U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality developed SHARE as a generalized SDM approach. We sought to adapt SHARE to the different problems that patients face using a matrix to relate SHARE steps and Purposeful SDM modes and describe changes in generalized concepts and practices of SDM across these modes. RESULTS: Many SHARE communicative behaviors applied across modes, although the meaning of SDM terms and practices, e.g. patients involved as problem solvers versus experts, varied substantially. CONCLUSION: Aspects of SHARE require adaptation to different patient problems. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: SDM in education, practice, and tools may be supported by adapting generalized SDM approaches to patients' problems.
OBJECTIVE: Generalized shared decision making (SDM) describes the involvement of patients in choosing options. However, there are many situations in which patients and clinicians make decisions together that don't focus on choosing between options, e.g. problem-solving dialysis and insulin use while traveling. Poor uptake associated with clinicians' perception that SDM doesn't apply to clinical situations they face may reflect the lack of adaptation of generalized SDM approaches to patients' problems. The Purposeful SDM schema published in 2019 identifies problems for which different kinds of SDM are appropriate. METHODS: The U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality developed SHARE as a generalized SDM approach. We sought to adapt SHARE to the different problems that patients face using a matrix to relate SHARE steps and Purposeful SDM modes and describe changes in generalized concepts and practices of SDM across these modes. RESULTS: Many SHARE communicative behaviors applied across modes, although the meaning of SDM terms and practices, e.g. patients involved as problem solvers versus experts, varied substantially. CONCLUSION: Aspects of SHARE require adaptation to different patient problems. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: SDM in education, practice, and tools may be supported by adapting generalized SDM approaches to patients' problems.
Authors: Pål Gulbrandsen; Marla L Clayman; Mary Catherine Beach; Paul K Han; Emily F Boss; Eirik H Ofstad; Glyn Elwyn Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2016-07-07
Authors: Peter Scalia; Marie-Anne Durand; Julia L Berkowitz; Nithya P Ramesh; Marjan J Faber; Jan A M Kremer; Glyn Elwyn Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2018-12-21
Authors: Glyn Elwyn; Marie Anne Durand; Julia Song; Johanna Aarts; Paul J Barr; Zackary Berger; Nan Cochran; Dominick Frosch; Dariusz Galasiński; Pål Gulbrandsen; Paul K J Han; Martin Härter; Paul Kinnersley; Amy Lloyd; Manish Mishra; Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez; Isabelle Scholl; Kounosuke Tomori; Lyndal Trevena; Holly O Witteman; Trudy Van der Weijden Journal: BMJ Date: 2017-11-06
Authors: Nakul Aggarwal; Mahnoor Ahmed; Sanjay Basu; John J Curtin; Barbara J Evans; Michael E Matheny; Shantanu Nundy; Mark P Sendak; Carmel Shachar; Rashmee U Shah; Sonoo Thadaney-Israni Journal: NAM Perspect Date: 2020-11-30
Authors: Sandra A Hartasanchez; Stuart W Grande; Victor M Montori; Marleen Kunneman; Juan P Brito; Sarah McCarthy; Ian G Hargraves Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2021-11-08
Authors: Jennifer L Barton; Marleen Kunneman; Ian Hargraves; Annie LeBlanc; Juan P Brito; Isabelle Scholl; Victor M Montori Journal: MDM Policy Pract Date: 2020-10-20
Authors: Inge Spronk; Sverre A I Loggers; Pieter Joosse; Hanna C Willems; Romke Van Balen; Taco Gosens; Kornelis J Ponsen; Jeroen Steens; L C P Marc Van de Ree; Rutger G Zuurmond; Michael H J Verhofstad; Esther M M Van Lieshout; Suzanne Polinder Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2022-08-02 Impact factor: 12.782