Pål Gulbrandsen1, Marla L Clayman2, Mary Catherine Beach3, Paul K Han4, Emily F Boss3, Eirik H Ofstad5, Glyn Elwyn6. 1. Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; HØKH Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway. Electronic address: pal.gulbrandsen@medisin.uio.no. 2. American Institutes for Research, 10 S Riverside Plaza, Suite 600, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, Nordland Hospital, Bodø, Norway. 6. The Preference Laboratory, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We describe the different ways in which illness represents an existential problem, and its implications for shared decision-making. METHODS: We explore core concepts of shared decision-making in medical encounters (uncertainty, vulnerability, dependency, autonomy, power, trust, responsibility) to interpret and explain existing results and propose a broader understanding of shared-decision making for future studies. RESULTS: Existential aspects of being are physical, social, psychological, and spiritual. Uncertainty and vulnerability caused by illness expose these aspects and may lead to dependency on the provider, which underscores that autonomy is not just an individual status, but also a varying capacity, relational of nature. In shared decision-making, power and trust are important factors that may increase as well as decrease the patient's dependency, particularly as information overload may increase uncertainty. CONCLUSION: The fundamental uncertainty, state of vulnerability, and lack of power of the ill patient, imbue shared decision-making with a deeper existential significance and call for greater attention to the emotional and relational dimensions of care. Hence, we propose that the aim of shared decision-making should be restoration of the patient's autonomous capacity. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: In doing shared decision-making, care is needed to encompass existential aspects; informing and exploring preferences is not enough.
OBJECTIVE: We describe the different ways in which illness represents an existential problem, and its implications for shared decision-making. METHODS: We explore core concepts of shared decision-making in medical encounters (uncertainty, vulnerability, dependency, autonomy, power, trust, responsibility) to interpret and explain existing results and propose a broader understanding of shared-decision making for future studies. RESULTS: Existential aspects of being are physical, social, psychological, and spiritual. Uncertainty and vulnerability caused by illness expose these aspects and may lead to dependency on the provider, which underscores that autonomy is not just an individual status, but also a varying capacity, relational of nature. In shared decision-making, power and trust are important factors that may increase as well as decrease the patient's dependency, particularly as information overload may increase uncertainty. CONCLUSION: The fundamental uncertainty, state of vulnerability, and lack of power of the ill patient, imbue shared decision-making with a deeper existential significance and call for greater attention to the emotional and relational dimensions of care. Hence, we propose that the aim of shared decision-making should be restoration of the patient's autonomous capacity. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: In doing shared decision-making, care is needed to encompass existential aspects; informing and exploring preferences is not enough.
Authors: Ian G Hargraves; Victor M Montori; Juan P Brito; Marleen Kunneman; Kevin Shaw; Christina LaVecchia; Michael Wilson; Laura Walker; Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2019-07-19
Authors: Frederick R Kates; Ryan Romero; Daniel Jones; Jacqueline Egelfeld; Santanu Datta Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-04-09 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Marleen Kunneman; Ellen M A Smets; Femke H Bouwman; Niki S M Schoonenboom; Marissa D Zwan; Ruth Pel-Littel; Wiesje M van der Flier Journal: Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Date: 2017-05-10