| Literature DB >> 32634550 |
Raheleh Torabi1, Reza Ranjbar2, Mehrdad Halaji3, Mohammad Heiat4.
Abstract
The recently known coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, has turn into the greatest global health challenge, affecting a large number of societies. The lack of specific treatment and gold-standard diagnostic system has made the situation more complicated. Efforts have led to production of several diagnostic kits that are associated with limitations such as inadequate sensitivity and accuracy. Aptamers as multipotent biological probes could be promising candidates to design sensitive and specific biosensors. Although few studies have introduced specific aptamer types of coronavirus, they may help us select the best approach to obtain specific aptamers for this virus. On the other hand, some of already-introduced aptamers have shown the inhibitory effects on coronavirus that could be applied as therapeutics. The present study has provided a systematic overview on use of aptamer-based biosensors and drugs to diagnose and treat coronavirus.Entities:
Keywords: Aptamer; COVID-19; Coronavirus; MERS; Probe; SARS; SARS-CoV-2; Therapy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32634550 PMCID: PMC7334654 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcp.2020.101636
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Cell Probes ISSN: 0890-8508 Impact factor: 2.365
Fig. 1Flow diagram of study selection.
A brief overview of the aptamers probes against coronavirus.
| No | Aptamer name | Type | Molecular Target | Length | Sequence | Kd (nM) | Viral target | SELEX method | Detection method | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RNA aptamer-1-based sensitive detection of SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein | RNA | SARS-CoV Nucleocapsid (N) protein | 83 | GGGAGAGCGGAAGCGUGCUGGGCCUGUCGUUCGCUGUGUCUUGCUACGUUACGUUACACGGUUGGCAUAACCCAGAGGUCGAUGG | 1.65 | SARS-CoV | Conventional SELEX | Aptamer-antibody hybrid immunoassays | [ |
| 2 | RNA aptamer-2-based sensitive detection of SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein | RNA | SARS-CoV Nucleocapsid (N) protein | 83 | GGGAGAGCGGAAGCGUGCUGGGCCUCAUUACACACAUCUCACGGGAGACAUAGCUGACGAUAUCCAUAACCCAGAGGUCGAUGG- | 3.35 | Conventional SELEX | – | [ | |
| 3 | DNA aptamer specific to SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein | ssDNA | SARS-CoV Nucleocapsid (N) protein | 88 | GCAATGGTACGGTACTTCCGGATGCGGGAAACTGGCTAATTGGTGAGGCGTGGGGCGGTCGTGCAGCAAAAGTGCACGCTACTTTGCTAA- | 4.93 | His-tagged N proteins immobilized on Ni–NTA sepharose beads | Western blot analysis (0–18.4 μg) | [ | |
| 4 | CoV2-RBD-1C | ssDNA | Receptor-Binding | 51 | CAGCACCGACCTTGTGCTTTGGGAGTGCTGGTCCAAGGGCGTTAATGGACA | 5.5 | SARS-CoV-2 | Ni-Beads-SELEX | Flow cytometric analysis | [ |
| 5 | CoV2-RBD-4C | ssDNA | Receptor-Binding | 67 | ATCCAGAGTGACGCAGCATTTCATCGGGTCCAAAAGGGGCTGCTCGGGATTGCGGATATGGACACGT | 19.9 | Ni-Beads-SELEX | Flow cytometric analysis | [ |
Fig. 2Secondary structures of diagnostic Coronaviruses aptamers. a) The secondary structures of different RNA (14), b and c) DNA [16,18] were predicted using the MFold program or permitted previous studies. The variable regions are marked with different colors.
A brief overview of the potent therapeutic aptamers against coronavirus.
| No | Name | Type | Target | Length | Sequence | IC50 (nM) | Viral target | SELEX | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1–1 | NG1 | ssDNA | SARS-CoV Helicase | 93 | CCGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGAGCTCGGTACCGAATTCGTGTGAGGGTGAGATGTGTGTGTATTTGTCAAGCTTTGCAGAGAGGATCCTT | 87.7 | SARS-CoV | Ni-NTA magnetic beads | [ |
| 1–2 | NG3 | CCGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGAGCTCGGTACCGAATTCAGGTGGGCATGATTGTGTGTTTGTGTCGGTAAGCTTTCAGAGAGGATCCTT | 120.8 | ||||||
| 1–3 | NG8 | CCGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGAGCTCGGTACCGAATTCATGTTGGTAGTTGGCTTGTGTTCGTGTGTTAAGCTTTGCAGAGAGGATCCTT | 91.0 | ||||||
| 1–4 | 3′-inverted thymidine aptamer NG8 | CCGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGAGCTCGGTACCGAATTCATGTTGGTAGTTGGCTTGTGTTCGTGTGTTAAGCTTTCAGAGAGGATCCTT | 17.5 | ||||||
| 1–5 | 3′-biotin aptamer NG8 | CCGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGAGCTCGGTACCGAATTCATGTTGGTAGTTGGCTTGTGTTCGTGTGTTAAGCTTTCAGAGAGGATCCTT | 55.8 | ||||||
| 2–1 | ES15-1 | RNA | SARS-CoV NTPase/Helicase | 107 | GAUAAUACGACUCACUAUAGGGUUCACUGCAGACUUGACGAAGCUUGCAGAAAAGGGGGAAGAAGAGGGUGAUUCAGGCGAGAGAAUGGAUCCACAUCUACGAAUUC | RNA pool inhibitory effect: 1.2 | Conventional SELEX | [ | |
| 2–2 | ES15-2 | GAUAAUACGACUCACUAUAGGGUUCACUGCAGACUUGACGAAGCUUCAGGGAGGAAAGGGGGAAGCGACUCAAGAACUGUAGAGGGAAUGGAUCCACAUCUACGAAUUC | |||||||
| 2–3 | ES15-3 | GAUAAUACGACUCACUAUAGGGUUCACUGCAGACUUGACGAAGCUUCCGGGCGGUCAAAGGAGAAGAAGAAAGAGAGAGCCCAGGGAAAUGGAUCCACAUCUACGAAUUC | |||||||
| 2–4 | ES15-4 | GAUAAUACGACUCACUAUAGGGUUCACUGCAGACUUGACGAAGCUUGGAGGGAAAAGGGGAAGCGGAAAGGUUAAGGAUGCGGAGGAAUGGAUCCACAUCUACGAAUUC | |||||||
| 2–5 | ES15-5 | GAUAAUACGACUCACUAUAGGGUUCACUGCAGACUUGACGAAGCUUGGUUAGGGGGAAAGGGGACCAGGUUCGCAGGAAAGCAGAGAAUGGAUCCACAUCUACGAAUUC | |||||||
| 2–6 | ES15-6 | GAUAAUACGACUCACUAUAGGGUUCACUGCAGACUUGACGAAGCUUGGAAGGGAGAGCGGGAACAAGGAGAAAGAGAAGGGGAAUCCAAUGGAUCCACAUCUACGAAUUC |
Fig. 3Secondary structures of therapeutic Coronaviruses aptamers. a) The secondary structures of different ssDNA aptamer [23] were predicted using the MFold program. b) The AG-rich conserved sequences (Highlighted Regions) at the loop region in RNA aptamer pools, isolated by Jang et al., are assumed as binding motif structure to SARS-CoV RNA helicase [24].
Advantages and disadvantages of nucleic acid amplification-based diagnostic methods vs Aptamer based diagnostic methods.
| Method | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Nucleic acid amplification-based diagnostic methods | Ability to differentiate among strains and species | Limited targets to nucleic acid |
| High sensitivity and specificity | High-cost | |
| No need for viable organism | Expensive labeled reagents (probes) | |
| Simplicity and universal procedure | Pre-analytical sample preparation | |
| Availability in markets | Need for additional detection step after amplification | |
| Easy getting approved for clinical diagnostic usage | Need for expensive equipment and reagents | |
| Low stability | ||
| Aptamer based diagnostic methods | Recognize wide range of targets | Difficulties for generating for some molecules such as small molecules |
| High sensitivity and specificity | Problems toward commercialization | |
| High stability | Sensitivity to nuclease existed in serum and real samples | |
| Ease of use | Changes in affinity and specificity in real situations | |
| Ease of production | Low chemical diversity of natural oligonucleotide | |
| Low-cost | ||
| Simple modification and labeling | ||
| Compatibility with different diagnostic approaches |