| Literature DB >> 29746951 |
Qin Pan1, Fengling Luo1, Min Liu1, Xiao-Lian Zhang2.
Abstract
The entireEntities:
Keywords: Aptamer; Diagnosis; Infectious disease; SELEX; Therapy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29746951 PMCID: PMC7112547 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.04.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Infect ISSN: 0163-4453 Impact factor: 6.072
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of the SELEX process. The initial ssDNA or RNA pool is incubated with targets to form aptamer-target complexes. The target-bound aptamers are separated from unbound oligonucleotides and then amplified by PCR (DNA aptamers) or RT-PCR (RNA aptamers). This enriched pool of aptamers is used in the next round of selection. After the final round of selection, the enriched aptamer sequences are identified by cloning and sequencing individual clones.
Summary of potential antibacterial aptamers for diagnosis.
| Aptamer | Type | Organism | Target | Binding affinity | Detection limit | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T9 | DNA | ManLAM | – | |||
| 668 ± 59 nM | ||||||
| CE24 | DNA | CE protein | – | |||
| CE15 | CE24: 0.375 μM | |||||
| CE15: 0.16 μM | ||||||
| CSIR 2.11 | DNA | CE protein | – | – | ||
| MPT64-A1 | DNA | MPT64 | – | – | ||
| –(electrochemical aptasensor) | DNA | |||||
| MPT64 | 0.5 ± 0.2 fg/mL | |||||
| –(electrochemical aptasensor) | DNA | MPT64 | 0.2 fg/mL | |||
| G43 | RNA | EsxG protein | – | |||
| G78 | G43: 8.04 ± 1.90 nM | |||||
| G78: 78.85 ± 9.40 nM | ||||||
| MA1 | DNA | Whole-bacterium | ||||
| 12.02 nM). | ||||||
| Aptamer 1 | DNA | Whole-bacterium | 100 CFU/mL | |||
| 37 ± 4 nM | ||||||
| Aptamers 33 and 45 | DNA | Outer membrane proteins | – | 3 CFU/ mL (Aptamers 33) | ||
| I-2 | RNA | OmpC protein | – | |||
| 20 nM | ||||||
| C4 | DNA | Whole-bacterium | – | – | ||
| ST2P | DNA | Whole-bacterium | 25 CFU/mL | |||
| 6.33 ± 0.58 nM | ||||||
| SAL 26 | DNA | Whole-bacterium | 102 CFU/mL | |||
| 123 ± 23 nM | ||||||
| Apt22 | DNA | Whole-bacterium | 103 CFU/mL | |||
| 47 ± 3 nM | ||||||
| S25 | RNA | Mixtures of ten strains of | – | – | ||
| Crn-1 and crn-2 | DNA | Whole-bacterium | ||||
| crn-1: | ||||||
| 0.971 µM | ||||||
| crn-2: | ||||||
| 0.309 µM | ||||||
| APTSEB1 | DNA | SEB | – | – | ||
| C10 | DNA | SEC1 | 6 ng/mL SEC1 in food samples | |||
| 65.14 ± 11.64 nM/L | ||||||
| R12.06 | DNA | Alpha toxin | 200 nM alpha toxin in human serum samples | |||
| 93.7 ± 7.0 nM | ||||||
| Antibac1 and Antibac2 | DNA | Peptidoglycan | – | |||
| Antibac1: | ||||||
| 0.415 ± 0.047 μM | ||||||
| Antibac2: | ||||||
| 1.261 ± 0.280 μM | ||||||
| PA#2/8 | DNA | Protein A | – | |||
| 172 ± 14 nM for the recombinant Protein A | ||||||
| 84 ± 5 nM for the native Protein A | ||||||
| SA20, SA23, SA31, SA34 SA43 | DNA | Whole-bacterium | Median effective concentration, EC50 | 682 CFU/mL in whole blood (SA20-conjugate-based assay) | ||
| SA20: | ||||||
| 70.86 ± 39.22 nM | ||||||
| SA23: | ||||||
| 61.50 ± 22.43 nM | ||||||
| SA31: | ||||||
| 82.86 ± 33.20 nM | ||||||
| SA34: | ||||||
| 72.42 ± 35.23 nM | ||||||
| SA43: | ||||||
| 210.70 ± 135.91 nM | ||||||
| SA17 | DNA | Whole-bacterium | Single cell | |||
| SA61 | SA17: 35 nM | |||||
| SA61: 129 nM | ||||||
| A8 | DNA | Internalin A | – | 103 CFU/mL | ||
| LLO-3 | DNA | Listeriolysin O | – | 4–61 CFU/100 μL | ||
| Lbi-17 | DNA | Whole-bacterium | – | 60 CFU/500 μL | ||
| LMCA2 LMCA26 | DNA | Whole-bacterium | 20 CFU/mL | |||
| LMCA2: | ||||||
| 2.01 × 10−12 M | ||||||
| LMCA26: | ||||||
| 1.56 × 10−10 M | ||||||
| E-5, E-11, E-12, E-16, E-17, E-18, E-19 | DNA | LPS | – | – | ||
| AM-6 | DNA | Whole-bacterium | ||||
| 107.6 ± 67.8 pmol | ||||||
| Apt B12 | DNA | Whole-bacterium | 1.1 × 103 CFU/mL in pure culture; 2.2 × 103 CFU/g in artificially contaminated fecal sample | |||
| 15 ± 4 nM | ||||||
| E1, E2, E10, E12 | DNA | Whole-bacterium | 8 CFU/mL | |||
| E1: 12.4 nM | ||||||
| E2: 25.2 nM | (E1) | |||||
| E10: 14.2 nM | ||||||
| E12: 16.8 Nm | ||||||
| Ec3(31) | RNA | Whole-cell | 2 × 104 CFU/mL | |||
| 225 nM | ||||||
| 8.28A | DNA | Whole-cell | ||||
| 27.4 ± 18.7 nM. |
Summary of potential antibacterial aptamers for therapy.
| Aptamer | Type | Organism | Target | Binding Affinity | Detection limit | Ref |
| NK2 | DNA | Whole-bacterium | – | |||
| 1.84 × 105(± 1.5 × 104) M−1; | ||||||
| 7.65 × 106 (± 6.0 × 105) M−1 | ||||||
| ZXL1 | DNA | ManLAM | – | |||
| 436.3 ± 37.84 nM | ||||||
| BM2 | DNA | BCG | ManLAM | – | ||
| 8.59 ± 1.23 nM | ||||||
| Mtb-Apt1 Mtb-Apt6 | DNA | Acetohydroxyacid synthase | – | |||
| Mtb-Apt1: | ||||||
| 1.06 ± 0.10 μM | ||||||
| Mtb-Apt6: | ||||||
| 0.210 ± 0.05 μM | ||||||
| S-PS8.4 | RNA | Type IVB pili | 1 CFU | |||
| 8.56 nM | ||||||
| S3 | DNA | SEA | – | |||
| 36.93 ± 7.29 nM | ||||||
| AT-33 | DNA | α-toxin | Aptamers increased viability from 50–60% in cells treated with toxin alone up to about 85–90%. | |||
| AT-36 | ||||||
Summary of potential antiviral aptamers for diagnosis.
| Aptamers | Type of aptamer | Organism | Target | Binding Affinity ( | Inhibitory effect | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNATat | RNA | HIV-1 | Tat | 120 ± 13 pM | Strong affinity for Tat even in the presence of a large excess of HIV TAR in cell culture | |
| ZE2 | DNA | HCV | E2 protein | 1.05 ± 1 nM | Inhibition of HCV cell culture (HCVcc) infection | |
| 9-14 | RNA | HCV | Core protein | 9–14: 142 nM; | – | |
| 9-15 | 9–15: 224 nM | |||||
| C4 | DNA | HCV | Core Protein | – | Inhibition of HCV production | |
| LD: 3.3 pg/mL | ||||||
| A22 | DNA | Influenza A virus (H3N2) | HA(91-261) | – | Inhibition of the hemagglutinin capacity of the virus and viral infectivity | |
| Clone B | RNA | Influenza A virus (H3N2) | HA | 200 pM | – | |
| P30-10-16 | RNA | Influenza A virus (H3N2) | Whole virus | 188 pM | 95% inhibition of viral fusion efficiencies in the presence of 5 μM aptamers | |
| A10 | DNA | Influenza A virus (H5N1) | HA | – | Inhibition of receptor binding | |
| C7 | DNA | Influenza A virus (H9N2) | HA(101-257) | – | 55% inhibition of the viral infection at 1 nM in the cell viability assay | |
| HAS15-5 | RNA | Influenza A virus (H5N1) | HA | – | Inhibition of receptor binding | |
| D-26 | RNA | Influenza A virus (H1N1) | HA | 67 fM | Complete inhibition of the agglutination of RBC in the presence of 200 nM aptamer | |
| HA68 | DNA | Influenza A virus (H3N2) | HA | 7.1 nM | Inhibition of the agglutination of RBC in the presence of 2.5 μM aptamers, and detection of H3N2 variant isolated from human cases | |
| 8-3 | RNA | Influenza A virus (H5N1 and H7N7) | HAs from H5N1 and H7N7 | 170 fM | Efficiently interferes with HA-glycan binding (EC50: 25 nM) | |
| ApI | DNA | Influenza A virus | HA1 subunit | ApI: 64.76 ± 18.24 nM | Binding to the HA1 subunit of subtype H1 (H1-HA1), but not to the HA1 subunit of subtype H5 (H5-HA1) | |
| ApII | ApII: 69.06 ± 12.34 nM | |||||
| ApIII | ApIII: 50.32 ± 14.07 nM | |||||
| A9 | DNA | Influenza A virus (H9N2) | HA | A9: 46.23 ± 5.46 nM | Inhibition of H9N2 virus infection | |
| B4 | B4: 7.38 ± 1.09 nM | |||||
| – | DNA | Influenza A virus | Whole virus | – | ||
| (H1N1) | 55.14 ± 22.40 nM | |||||
| IF22 | DNA | Influenza A virus (H5N1 and H5N8) | Whole virus | – | – | |
| IF23 | ||||||
| HBs-A22 | RNA | HBV | Surface antigen | – | Inhibition of receptor binding | |
| G5α3N.4 | RNA | HPV 16 | E7 protein | 1.9 μM | – |
Summary of potential antiviral aptamers for therapy.
| Aptamers | Type of aptamer | Organism | Target | Binding affinity ( | Inhibitory effect | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B40 | RNA | HIV-1 | Gp120 | B40: 21 ± 2 nM | Inhibition of gp120-CCR5 interaction | |
| B40t77 | B40t77: 31 ± 2 nM | |||||
| A-1 | RNA | HIV-1 | Gp120 | 52 nM | Inhibition of HIV-1 infection in primary human peripheral blood mononuclear cells | |
| BclON-mut | DNA | HIV-1 | Gp120 | 143 ± 79 nM | IC50: | |
| BclON-mut 0.08 ± 0.03 μg/mL | ||||||
| F-thio-BclON | 86 ± 17 nM | F-thio-BclON 0.040 ± 0.003 μg/mL | ||||
| 1.1 | RNA | HIV-1 | RT | 5 nM | – | |
| RT1t49 | DNA | HIV-1 | RT | 1 nM | IC50: 0.3 nM | |
| 4.20 | DNA | HIV-1 | RT | 180 ± 70 pM | – | |
| R12-2 | DNA | HIV-1 | RT | 70 nM | Inhibition of the RNase H activity of intact HIV-1 RT; IC50 < 100 nM | |
| 37NT | DNA | HIV-1 | RT | 660 pM | Inhibition of primer-template binding | |
| FA1 | FANA aptamer | HIV-1 | RT | Low pM range | Inhibition of HIV-1 RT primer extension | |
| RNApt16 | RNA | HIV-1 | 5′-untranslated region of HIV-1 genome | 280 ± 60 nM | Inhibition efficiency in a human cell line: 85% | |
| IV04 | DNA | HIV-1 | TAR RNA element | 20 nM | Formation of RNA-DNA kissing complexes for disrupting TAR secondary structure | |
| T30695 | DNA | HIV-1 | Integrase | 0.5 ± 0.2 μM | IC50 < 100 nM | |
| 93del | ssDNA | HIV-1 | Integrase | – | Inhibition of HIV-1 integrase in the nanomolar range | |
| 8-6 | RNA | HIV-1 | Nucleo-capsid protein | 1.4 × 10−9 M | – | |
| DP6-22 | RNA | HIV-1 | Gag protein | DP6-22: 100 ± 3.4 nM | Disrupting Gag-genomic RNA interaction and negatively affectiong genomic RNA transcription, processing, or stability | |
| RBE(apt) | RNA | HIV-1 | Rev protein | – | Conjugation with ribozyme targeting HIV Env for gene therapy | |
| S3R3 | RNA | HIV-1 | Integrase | 47 ± 3 nM | Anti-integrase aptamer expressed as an shRNA–aptamer fusion confered long term resistance to HIV-1 replication in T cells. | |
| G6-16 | RNA | HCV | NS3 protein | 238 nM | IC50: 3 μM | |
| G9-I | RNA | HCV | Truncated protease domain of NS3 protein | 10 nM | IC50: 100 nM | |
| G5 | RNA | HCV | Helicase domain of NS3 | 25 nM | IC50: 50 nM | |
| 3-07 | RNA | HCV | IRES domains III–IV | 9 nM | Inhibition of IRES-dependent translation | |
| AP50 | RNA | HCV | IRES | 5 nM | Inhibition of IRES-dependent translation; IC50 value in the low μM range | |
| HH-11 | RNA | HCV | IRES domain IIIf and IV | IC50 value of 170 ± 20 nM | ||
| 27v | DNA | HCV | NS5B | 132.3 ± 20 nM | IC50: 196 ± 16 nM | |
| r10/43 | RNA | HCV | NS5B | r10/43: 1.3 ± 0.3 nM | ||
| r10/43: 1.4 ± 2.4 nM | ||||||
| r10/47 | r10/47: 23.5 ± 6.7 nM | r10/47: 6.0 ± 2.3 nM | ||||
| R-F t2 | RNA | HCV | NS5B | 2.62 ± 0.90 × 10−9 M | Blocking both the initiation and the elongation of RNA synthesis | |
| HA12-16 | RNA | Influenza A virus (H5N2) | Glycosylated HA | – | Preventing influenza infection by strongly binding to the glycosylated HA | |
| PAN-2 | DNA | Influenza A virus | Amino acid residues in the N-terminal of the PAN of the influenza A virus polymerase | IC50: around 10 nM | ||
| (H1N1, H5N1, H7N7, and H7N9) | 247 ± 11 nM | |||||
| S9 | RNA | HBV | Truncated P protein | – | Competitively inhibiting P protein binding and suppressing viral pgRNA packaging | |
| Apt.No.28 | DNA | HBV | Core protein | – | Inhibiting the assembly of the nucleocapsid; reducing extracellular HBV DNA | |
| AO-01 | DNA | HBV | Capsid | 180 ± 82 nM | 47% inhibition of virion production at 3 days post transfection | |
| A2 | RNA | HPV 16 | E7 protein | 107 nM | Inhibtion of E7-pRb interaction | |
| F2 | RNA | HPV 16 | E6 protein | – | Inhibition of the interaction between E6 and PDZ-binding motif | |
| NG8 | DNA | SARS-CoV | Helicase | 5 nM | IC50: 91.0 nM | |
| S15 | DNA | DENV-2 | Envelop protein domain III | 200 nM | IC50: 4.2 μM | |
| GE54 | DNA | RABV | Glyco-protein | 307 nm | Inhibiting of viral replication and protecting mice challenged with RABV |
Fig. 2Optical aptasensor. A: Direct ELONA. The target is coated onto the plate and the biotinylated aptamer binds to the target followed by the addition of streptavidin-HRP conjugate and enzyme substrate for color development. B: Fluorescent aptasensors. Left panel, aptamers are labeled with fluorophores and the changes in the fluorescent signal are detected upon targets bound by the aptamers. Right panel, FRET process. A quencher is labeled on the complementary sequence of the aptamer. When the aptamer binds to the target, the quencher is moved away from the fluorophore owing to the conformational change of the aptamer and affords “signal on” detection. C: Optical and AuNPs-based aptasensors. Aptamer1-AuNPs and Aptamer2-magnetic nanoparticles are mixed with the target bacteria. Aptamer2-magnetic nanoparticles-target-Aptamer1-AuNPs complexes are formed. In the magnetic field, the target bacteria are accumulated, and the changes in the absorbance spectrum are detected.
Fig. 3Electrochemical aptasensor. A: SWCNT-based aptasensor. Aptamers are immobilized on SWCNTs. When the immobilized aptamers capture the target bacteria, a measurable change emerges in the conductance of the system. B: GO-based aptasensor. Aptamers are loaded onto the GO sheet. The binding of the aptamers to targets causes the aptamers to leave from the sheet surface. Consequently, EMF changes take place.
Fig. 4SPR aptasensor and SAW aptasensor. A: SPR aptasensor. Aptamers are immobilized on the chip. The binding between targets and aptamers leads to a change in the plasmon resonance and plasmon angle. B: SAW aptasensor. The phase shift and amplitude of SAW changes because of the binding of targets to surface-immobilized aptamer.