Literature DB >> 23402118

Effect of swab matrix, storage time, and temperature on detection of avian influenza virus RNA in swab samples.

Sasan R Fereidouni1, Anja Globig, Elke Starick, Timm C Harder.   

Abstract

Virologic monitoring of avian influenza viruses (AIV) mainly relies on the collection of oropharyngeal, cloacal, or fecal swab samples. The quality of swab samples, therefore, contributes to limitations of the informative value of such monitoring, but the cost of sampling has a great impact on the feasibility of wild bird monitoring studies or poultry surveillance programs. Here, the effect of different swab material and storage conditions on quality and quantity of AIV RNA detection in swab samples by real-time reverse-transcription quantitative PCR has been studied. Two commercial swab products, a rayon-tipped and a flocked nylon type, were compared. Similar suitability of the two swab types, despite a huge price difference, was observed. Superior results by using both types of swab were gained provided that 1) swabs stayed immersed overnight in an appropriate viral transport medium (VTM), or that 2) swabs were vigorously shaken in VTM for at least 1 min and up to 1 hr to release as much trapped virus material as possible. Degradation of RNA over a period of 2 wk for virus-containing samples is negligible when using constant storage conditions at 4 C or 20 C; temperature shifts proved to be more harmful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23402118     DOI: 10.1637/10146-033012-ResNote.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Dis        ISSN: 0005-2086            Impact factor:   1.577


  7 in total

1.  Equivalence of influenza A virus RNA recovery from nasal swabs when lysing the swab and storage medium versus storage medium alone.

Authors:  Maya Nadimpalli; Nora Pisanic; Christopher D Heaney; Jill Stewart
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.014

2.  Laboratory diagnosis of avian influenza virus H7N9 infection in a renal transplant recipient.

Authors:  Jun Cheng; Bo Wang; Xiaoxiao Jiang; Dawei Cui; Jian Chen; Yuzhu Dai; Changgui Sun
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-02-15

Review 3.  Review of Current COVID-19 Diagnostics and Opportunities for Further Development.

Authors:  Yan Mardian; Herman Kosasih; Muhammad Karyana; Aaron Neal; Chuen-Yen Lau
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-07

4.  Aptamers, the bivalent agents as probes and therapies for coronavirus infections: A systematic review.

Authors:  Raheleh Torabi; Reza Ranjbar; Mehrdad Halaji; Mohammad Heiat
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 5.  The use of Nanotrap particles for biodefense and emerging infectious disease diagnostics.

Authors:  Nazly Shafagati; Alexis Patanarut; Alessandra Luchini; Lindsay Lundberg; Charles Bailey; Emanuel Petricoin; Lance Liotta; Aarthi Narayanan; Benjamin Lepene; Kylene Kehn-Hall
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.166

6.  Failure of productive infection of Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) with H16 subtype of avian influenza viruses.

Authors:  Sasan R Fereidouni; Timm C Harder; Anja Globig; Elke Starick
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 4.380

7.  Effects of swab pool size and transport medium on the detection and isolation of avian influenza viruses in ostriches.

Authors:  Reneé Pieterse; Christine Strydom; Celia Abolnik
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 2.741

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.