Collin A Eagles-Smith1, James J Willacker1, Sarah J Nelson2,3, Colleen M Flanagan Pritz4, David P Krabbenhoft5, Celia Y Chen6, Joshua T Ackerman7, Evan H Campbell Grant8, David S Pilliod9. 1. United States Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Corvallis, Oregon 97330, United States. 2. School of Forest Resources, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, United States. 3. Appalachian Mountain Club, Gorham, New Hampshire 03581, United States. 4. National Park Service, Air Resources Division, National Resource, Stewardship and Science Directorate, Lakewood, Colorado 80228, United States. 5. United States Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Water Science Center, Middleton, Wisconsin 53562, United States. 6. Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, United States. 7. United States Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon, California 95620, United States. 8. United States Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Turners Falls, Massachussetts 01376, United States. 9. United States Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Boise, Idaho 83706, United States.
Abstract
We conducted a national-scale assessment of mercury (Hg) bioaccumulation in aquatic ecosystems, using dragonfly larvae as biosentinels, by developing a citizen-science network to facilitate biological sampling. Implementing a carefully designed sampling methodology for citizen scientists, we developed an effective framework for a landscape-level inquiry that might otherwise be resource limited. We assessed the variation in dragonfly Hg concentrations across >450 sites spanning 100 United States National Park Service units and examined intrinsic and extrinsic factors associated with the variation in Hg concentrations. Mercury concentrations ranged between 10.4 and 1411 ng/g dry weight across sites and varied among habitat types. Dragonfly total Hg (THg) concentrations were up to 1.8-fold higher in lotic habitats than in lentic habitats and 37% higher in waterbodies with abundant wetlands along their margins than those without wetlands. Mercury concentrations in dragonflies differed among families but were correlated (r2 > 0.80) with each other, enabling adjustment to a consistent family to facilitate spatial comparisons among sampling units. Dragonfly THg concentrations were positively correlated with THg concentrations in both fish and amphibians from the same locations, indicating that dragonfly larvae are effective indicators of Hg bioavailability in aquatic food webs. We used these relationships to develop an integrated impairment index of Hg risk to aquatic ecosytems and found that 12% of site-years exceeded high or severe benchmarks of fish, wildlife, or human health risk. Collectively, this continental-scale study demonstrates the utility of dragonfly larvae for estimating the potential mercury risk to fish and wildlife in aquatic ecosystems and provides a framework for engaging citizen science as a component of landscape Hg monitoring programs.
We conducted a national-scale assessment of mercury (Hg) bioaccumulation in aquatic ecosystems, using dragonfly larvae as biosentinels, by developing a citizen-science network to facilitate biological sampling. Implementing a carefully designed sampling methodology for citizen scientists, we developed an effective framework for a landscape-level inquiry that might otherwise be resource limited. We assessed the variation in dragonfly Hg concentrations across >450 sites spanning 100 United States National Park Service units and examined intrinsic and extrinsic factors associated with the variation in Hg concentrations. Mercury concentrations ranged between 10.4 and 1411 ng/g dry weight across sites and varied among habitat types. Dragonfly total Hg (THg) concentrations were up to 1.8-fold higher in lotic habitats than in lentic habitats and 37% higher in waterbodies with abundant wetlands along their margins than those without wetlands. Mercury concentrations in dragonflies differed among families but were correlated (r2 > 0.80) with each other, enabling adjustment to a consistent family to facilitate spatial comparisons among sampling units. Dragonfly THg concentrations were positively correlated with THg concentrations in both fish and amphibians from the same locations, indicating that dragonfly larvae are effective indicators of Hg bioavailability in aquatic food webs. We used these relationships to develop an integrated impairment index of Hg risk to aquatic ecosytems and found that 12% of site-years exceeded high or severe benchmarks of fish, wildlife, or human health risk. Collectively, this continental-scale study demonstrates the utility of dragonfly larvae for estimating the potential mercury risk to fish and wildlife in aquatic ecosystems and provides a framework for engaging citizen science as a component of landscape Hg monitoring programs.
Environmental
mercury (Hg) contamination is recognized as a global
health threat.[1,2] The severity and scope of environmental
and human health risks posed by Hg contamination have motivated landscape-level
assessments of variability in mercury bioaccumulation and its drivers[3,4] as well as efforts to minimize fish, wildlife, and human Hg exposure
through reductions in environmental Hg releases.[5,6] Biosentinels
are an important tool for both landscape scale assessments and effectiveness
evaluations of Hg reductions because inorganic Hg loading is often
decoupled from methylmercury (MeHg) production, uptake, and biomagnification
through food webs.[7−9] However, implementing a biosentinel network at broad
scales can be complicated by the availability of the appropriate taxa,
and the cost and logistics of executing an appropriate sampling design.Many animals can serve as effective Hg biosentinels, but their
utility is dependent upon both the characteristics of the organism
and the inference needs of the data.[10] Fish
and aquatic-dependent birds are commonly used as Hg biosentinels because
they can directly inform exposure risk to humans or other sensitive
wildlife species that rely on aquatic food webs.[11] However, challenges can emerge when consistent taxa are
unavailable across the landscape or area of interest,[7] movements obfuscate the spatial and temporal origins of
bioaccumulated Hg;[12] or water bodies lack
resident fish populations.[13] Vertebrate
sampling can also be impeded by logistical, regulatory, or ethical
concerns. Therefore, a geographically widespread biosentinel that
occurs in a variety of habitat types would be particularly valuable
if it provided a reliable measure of MeHg bioaccumulation at fine
spatial scales, informed potential wildlife exposure in both fish-containing
and fishless environments, and was logistically easy to sample.Some aquatic insect larvae meet many of the above characteristics,
but their widespread use has been limited because they can lack nexus
to human exposure, may require technical expertise to identify, and
exhibit low and variable percentages of methylmercury (% MeHg).[14] Dragonfly larvae (Odonata Anisoptera) may represent
an exception in many respects. Dragonfly larvae are obligate predatory
invertebrates and occupy diverse freshwater habitats across six continents,[15] have a narrow trophic range, and have tissues
in which most Hg content is as MeHg.[16−18] Dragonfly larvae are
common even in waters where other Hg biosentinels, such as fish, do
not occur, and their high site fidelity ensures that their tissues
reflect the localized food web MeHg availability.[15] Dragonfly larvae total mercury (THg) is well-correlated
with both aqueous MeHg and sportfish THg,[17−19] linking dragonflies
to both environmental Hg concentrations and potential human exposure
pathways. Moreover, dragonfly larvae can serve as vectors of aquatic-derived
MeHg to terrestrial predators after dragonfly emergence.[20] Finally, dragonfly larvae are relatively easy
to collect and identify, making them ideal for nontraditional monitoring
networks, such as citizen science.Within a citizen-science
framework we used dragonfly larvae as
biosentinels for an assessment of Hg bioaccumulation in aquatic ecosystems
of National Park Service units and other protected lands (hereafter
NPS units). As protected environments generally free from Hg point
sources, NPS units serve as optimal locations for evaluating the effectiveness
of global Hg reduction efforts on Hg exposure in freshwater ecosystems.
The goals of this effort were to (1) implement a national-scale biological
Hg monitoring program in protected lands, (2) assess the geographic
variation in dragonfly THg concentrations across habitat types, and
(3) establish dragonflies as an effective biosentinel to inform potential
exposure risk at a continental scale. We developed strict protocols
and training approaches that facilitated engagement of citizen-science
volunteers for sample collection in NPS units across the contiguous
United States (US), Alaska, and Hawaii. We then examined the influence
of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on dragonfly THg concentrations,
and finally correlated dragonfly Hg concentrations with those from
fishes and amphibians sampled from the same locations to determine
the efficacy of dragonflies for informing Hg exposure and potential
impairment in other taxa.
Methods
The Dragonfly Mercury Project
is a national-scale research and
monitoring effort that engages citizen scientists paired with trained
NPS staff to collect dragonfly larvae for Hg analysis at national
parks across the United States (Supporting Information).
Field Sites
During 2009–2018, dragonfly larvae
representing six families were collected from 457 unique locations
across 100 NPS units (Figure S1). We targeted
at least three sites per unit, unless there were insufficient sites
in the case of small park units; the average number of sites per unit
was 4.4. In total, we compiled data from 877 unique site–year
combinations. Site selection was not random, but we strived to incorporate
a variety of diverse habitats within each park unit to assess habitat
effects of Hg bioaccumulation.Sampling sites were classified
as one of five primary habitats (rivers, streams, lakes, ponds, and
wetlands), with these primary habitats further divided into one of
16 secondary habitats based on water permanence, proximity to hydrologically
connected wetlands, and waterbody size (Table S1).
Sample Collection
Dragonfly larvae
Dragonfly larvae were sampled from
each site with dip nets, generally between spring and fall. Sampling
was conducted by a combination of researchers, trained NPS staff,
and volunteer citizen scientists under the supervision of trained
project staff, following strict sample handling and storage protocols
(https://www.nps.gov/articles/dragonfly-mercury-project.htm).
Between 15 and 20 dragonfly larvae were targeted from each site and
event, and efforts were made to ensure that replicates for each dragonfly
family were sampled when present (Supporting Information). Each sample was double-bagged in prelabeled, polyethylene zipper-seal
bags and held on wet or dry ice until transferred to a freezer within
8 h. To minimize potential contamination, all dragonfly larvae were
handled with gloved hands, or clean plastic spoons. We stored all
samples at −20 °C or colder until processing and Hg determination
could be completed.
Fish
Fish samples were collected
from a subset of the
sites also sampled for dragonfly larvae. Some sites represented locations
not associated with national parks but where dragonfly larvae and
fish were both sampled together. From 41 unique locations, we collected
several fish species representing four distinct guilds, piscivores
(non-salmonid), sunfish, salmonids, and forage fish, that occur across
the various habitats sampled (Table S2).
Fish were collected using various methods, including electrofishing,
hook and line, beach seines, and gill nets. Fish were euthanized under
approved animal care and use protocols, placed into clean and labeled
polyethylene bags, and stored on ice in the field until returned to
the laboratory, where samples were held at −20 °C until
processing.
Amphibians
Four species of aquatic-stage
salamanders
and two species of adult frogs were captured at 50 and 21 sites, respectively,
where dragonfly larvae were also sampled (Table S2). Amphibians were captured using dip nets or minnow traps,
and then, nonlethal tissue samples (tail clips for salamanders and
toe clips for frogs) were collected from each individual[21] and stored frozen at −20 °C until
Hg determination.
Laboratory Preparation and Analysis
In the laboratory,
all dragonfly, fish, and amphibian samples were dried to a constant
mass and either homogenized to a fine powder or prepared for analysis
whole. We determined THg concentrations on all samples, following
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) method 7473,[22] and MeHg concentrations on a subset (n = 652) of samples, following EPA method 1630.[23] Methodological details and quality assurance/quality control
details can be found in Supporting Information. Total Hg analysis was conducted at the United States Geological
Survey (USGS) contaminant ecology research lab (87% of samples; N = 12845), the University of Maine (12% of samples; N = 1842), and Dartmouth College (1% of samples; N = 144). Interlaboratory comparisons were conducted between
the two primary laboratories to ensure data comparability, which are
summarized in Supporting Information.
Statistical Analyses
All data were natural-log transformed
prior to analyses to normalize residuals and meet the assumptions
for parametric statistical tests. Unless specified otherwise, we present
estimates of the central tendency as geometric or back-transformed
least-squares means because of the log-normal distribution of concentration
data. All statistical analyses were conducted using JMP V14.0 (SAS
Institute, Cary, NC).
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors
We examined the importance
of key intrinsic (taxonomy and body length) and extrinsic (habitat type and ecoregion[24]) variables on dragonfly THg concentrations using a linear
mixed-effects model that included family, habitat type, and level
1 ecoregions as fixed effects and site and categorical sampling year
as random effects. We also included total body length (TL) as a covariate,
and TL × family, TL × site, and TL × family ×
site interactions. The initial model results did not support including
TL in the model (see Results and Discussion); therefore, we removed TL and its associated interactions from
the model. The variables selected for the model are those that have
been shown to be associated with biological Hg concentrations at broad
scales[7] and represent the underlying processes
and mechanisms that drive Hg cycling and bioaccumulation. Although
sampling spanned several months, each site was generally only sampled
once per year, and sites with similar climates and hydrology were
usually sampled within a similar time frame. Therefore, we did not
explicitly assess or account for seasonal variation in our models.
Taxonomic Conversions
We next examined relationships
in THg concentrations among dragonfly families by correlating paired
geometric mean THg concentrations of different families collected
concurrently at the same site. For each family pair, we developed
linear regression equations for predicting THg concentrations in one
family based on those in another. The Aeshnidae family represented
the largest proportion (41%) of the data set and was consistently
correlated with each of the other families. Therefore, we used the
linear regression equations to convert each individual sample from
the other families to an Aeshnid-equivalent THg concentration. By
normalizing concentrations to a consistent family, the Aeshnid-equivalent
concentrations allow for more-representative comparisons across sites
and time periods without confounding effects of taxonomy.
Bioindicator
Suitability
The suitability of dragonfly
larvae as biosentinels of THg exposure in aquatic ecosystems is partly
predicated on their ability to provide inference about THg exposure
in other aquatic organisms at multiple levels of the food web. To
examine this, we paired collections of dragonflies at a subset of
sites where either fish or amphibian species were also sampled. At
each of these sites, we generated an Aeshnid-equivalent site–year
geometric mean THg concentration to ensure representative units were
used for dragonfly Hg concentrations.We similarly calculated
site–year geometric mean THg concentrations for each fish guild
and both salamanders and frogs. However, limited sample sizes and
a diverse range of species precluded adjusting concentrations to a
single taxon for each group, as was done with the dragonfly larvae.
We chose a guild-based approach because it aggregated related fish
species with a similar trophic ecology into discrete categories that
are applicable across a wide geographic range and multiple habitat
types. After calculating site- and taxa-specific geometric mean THg
concentrations for the fish and amphibians, we used linear regression
models for each taxonomic group to quantify the relationship in THg
concentrations between dragonfly larvae and other aquatic taxa.
Results and Discussion
From 2009 to 2018, more than
4000 citizen scientists contributed
to the collection of 14831 dragonfly larvae from 457 individual sites
in 100 different NPS units across the US, including Alaska and Hawaii
(Figure ). The geometric
mean (±geometric standard error) THg concentration [ng/g dry
weight (dw)] of all individual dragonfly larvae was 125 ± 2.2
(arithmetic mean ± standard deviation = 181 ± 217). The
park units (park unit type abbreviations are defined in Table S3) with the highest geometric mean THg
concentrations across all sites included Colorado NM, Bear Meadows
NNL, Minute Man NHP, and Maurice WSR, whereas those with the lowest
concentrations included Bear Creek Lake Park, Padre Island NS, Fort
Worth NNL, and Buffalo NR (Figure ). Individual sites with the highest THg concentrations
were in Olympic NP (1411 ± 41), Acadia NP (1319 ± 319),
Glen Canyon NRA (1207 ± 86), Maurice WSR (905 ± 38; 854
± 32; 745 ± 36), Capitol Reef NP (672 ± 92), and Yellowstone
NP (626 ± 20), whereas those with the lowest THg concentrations
were found in Bear Creek Lake Park (10.4 ± 1.2), Gulf Island
NS (16.4 ± 1.6), Padre Island NS (17.6 ± 5.2), Buffalo NR
(20.6 ± 2.5), and Forth Worth NNL (21.7 ± 1.8).
Figure 1
Total mercury
(THg) concentrations (ng/g dry weight) in dragonfly
larvae collected from National Park units across the conterminous
US, Alaska, and Hawaii. Bars represent park unit geometric means (±SE),
and circles represent geometric mean THg concentrations for individual
sampling sites (populations) within each unit. Colors represent aggregations
of US Department of Interior regions representative of western (orange),
central (blue), and eastern (green) areas, as illustrated in the inset
map. Arrows and associated text represent sites with geometric mean
THg concentrations beyond the extent of the x-axis.
Unit name suffixes are provided in Table S3. Note that the map geography is not to scale. Alterations were made
to include Alaska and Hawaii within the map frame. Bear Creek Lake
Park is not a NPS administered unit.
Total mercury
(THg) concentrations (ng/g dry weight) in dragonfly
larvae collected from National Park units across the conterminous
US, Alaska, and Hawaii. Bars represent park unit geometric means (±SE),
and circles represent geometric mean THg concentrations for individual
sampling sites (populations) within each unit. Colors represent aggregations
of US Department of Interior regions representative of western (orange),
central (blue), and eastern (green) areas, as illustrated in the inset
map. Arrows and associated text represent sites with geometric mean
THg concentrations beyond the extent of the x-axis.
Unit name suffixes are provided in Table S3. Note that the map geography is not to scale. Alterations were made
to include Alaska and Hawaii within the map frame. Bear Creek Lake
Park is not a NPS administered unit.In a subset of individuals (N = 652) analyzed
for both MeHg and THg, MeHg concentrations ranged from 12.3 to 1870
ng/g dw and were strongly correlated with THg concentrations (R2 = 0.96, p < 0.0001; Figure S2). Additionally, the % MeHg (proportion
of THg in the MeHg form) averaged (±SE) 79.9 ± 0.5% of THg
concentrations, which is similar to the ranges (83–94%) reported
elsewhere.[16,18] Collectively, these findings
suggest that, unlike other aquatic macroinvertebrate species where
low and variable % MeHg is a major limitation to their use as Hg bioindicators,
THg serves as an effective proxy for MeHg concentrations in dragonfly
larvae. Therefore, we use THg concentrations for further data analysis.
Variation
within and among Parks
Individual dragonfly
larvae THg concentrations spanned four orders of magnitude, from 1.0
to 3795 ng/g dw across all sites. Consistent with such a broad range
in concentrations, the data set’s geometric coefficient of
variation (GCV) was 96%, indicating a high degree of variability across
the landscape. However, the average GCV (±SE) within sites (with n ≥ 10) was nearly 3-fold less (35.3 ± 0.95%),
and within-site GCVs were not correlated with their paired site-specific
geometric mean THg concentrations (p = 0.84, n = 412), indicating that the within-site variation in THg
concentrations was relatively similar regardless of the overall Hg
condition of a site. These findings suggest that the variation in
THg concentrations among sites at a continental scale is substantially
higher than within sites. Indeed, site-specific geometric mean THg
concentrations ranged 135-fold (10.4–1411 ng/g dw; Figure ), and the GCV among all sites (86%) was more than double
the average GCV within sites, where concentrations ranged 5.7-fold,
on average (range = 1.2–100-fold). Importantly, even within
individual national park units, which is a substantially finer scale
than across the US, and where sites are in relatively close proximity
to one another, the average (±SE) for among-site GCV (62.7 ±
6.5%) was similar to the GCV among national parks (68.7%). This highlights
the importance of site-specific characteristics on Hg bioaccumulation.Site is often a dominant factor in influencing Hg bioaccumulation,[7,25,26] resulting in substantial geographic
variation. Mean fish THg concentrations in 206 species varied 496-fold
across >4000 locations throughout western North America,[7] and species-normalized concentrations varied
96-fold in nearly 2000 sites across Canada,[27] similar to the range of variation we found (135-fold) in dragonfly
larvae. This variation is not constrained to continental-scale assessments
nor likely due to the direct inorganic Hg contamination. For example,
fish THg concentrations in 28 high-elevation lakes of eastern Oregon,
US varied 18-fold,[28] despite being free
from direct watershed disturbance and receiving a similar atmospheric
Hg deposition. Furthermore, THg in fish from national parks in the
western US varied between 10- and 24-fold among sites.[29,30] Even at more local scales, fish Hg concentrations of individual
wetlands in the San Francisco Bay region of California varied by 15-fold
despite only being separated by narrow levees.[31] Likewise, we found high variation within individual national
parks, where dragonfly larvae THg concentrations varied 33-fold across
13 sites in Olympic NP, 32-fold between two sites in Gulf Islands
NS, 13-fold in 85 sites from Mount Rainier NP, 12-fold among 20 sites
in Acadia NP, and 11-fold across 17 sites in Yellowstone NP.Because inorganic Hg contamination is generally decoupled from
MeHg production, uptake, and bioaccumulation,[4] the high variability among sites (both within and among national
parks) is likely a result of site-specific biogeochemical and ecological
factors that control net MeHg production and bioavailability within
ecosystems. In fact, the variation in dragonfly THg concentrations
(135-fold across sites) was an order of magnitude higher than the
variation in THg wet deposition across the US (∼10-fold across
sites; http://nadp.slh.wisc.edu/). Thus, we next examined key extrinsic factors
known to influence biological MeHg exposure along with intrinsic factors that influence individual-level bioaccumulation.In
our initial global model, the length × family (p < 0.0001) and length × site (p < 0.0001)
interactions indicated potential site- or family-dependent
relationships between length and THg concentrations. Therefore, we
conducted individual regressions for each family and sampling site
where there were at least 15 samples from a given year (site–years
across five families; Table S4). Length
and THg concentrations were significantly correlated (p < 0.05) in only 82 (out of 298; 28%) site–years (Aeshnidae
= 34%, Cordulegastridae = 7%, Gomphidae = 17%, and Libellulidae/Corduliidae
= 26%). However, of the 82 site–years with a significant correlation
between THg concentration and dragonfly length, 54 (66%) were positive
correlations, and the remaining 28 (34%) were negative. Moreover,
the average R2 value for all significant
regressions (positive or negative) was only 0.37, and only 22% of
site–years had R2 values >0.50,
indicating that the body length was neither an overwhelming nor consistent
variable associated with dragonfly THg concentrations. Because of
the limited explanatory power and substantial variation in the directional
effect of body length on THg concentrations, we did not size-adjust
dragonfly THg concentrations, and we removed the length from subsequent
models.
Extrinsic Drivers: Habitat and Ecoregion
In the reduced
model (i.e., excluding length), dragonfly THg concentrations differed
among primary habitats (F4,438.3 = 7.30; p < 0.0001), secondary habitats (F1,1488.4 = 3.54; p < 0.0001), and among
ecoregions (F1,2435.4 = 4.99, p < 0.0001). Among the five primary habitat types, dragonfly
larvae THg concentrations were highest in rivers and streams (Figure ). Post hoc pairwise contrasts indicated that riverine dragonflies had higher
concentrations than those in all other habitat types except streams
(streams, F1,432 = 1.17, p = 0.28; lakes, F1,429.8 = 11.3, p = 0.0009; wetlands, F1,432.1 = 9.03, p = 0.003; ponds, F1,435.2 = 15.1, p < 0.0001); stream dragonflies
also were higher than those from the other three habitats (wetlands, F1,431.9 = 8.35, p = 0.004;
ponds, F1,439.2=18.0, p < 0.0001; lakes, F1,429 = 9.75, p = 0.002), which did not differ from one another.
Figure 2
Least squares
mean THg concentrations (ng/g dry weight) in dragonfly
larvae among habitat types in national park units across the US. Least
squares mean THg concentrations account for the effects of family,
ecoregion, site, and year. Patterned bars in secondary habitats represent
those bounded by extensive marginal wetlands. Letters represent the
significance at α = 0.05 based on pairwise contrasts and test
slices.
Least squares
mean THg concentrations (ng/g dry weight) in dragonfly
larvae among habitat types in national park units across the US. Least
squares mean THg concentrations account for the effects of family,
ecoregion, site, and year. Patterned bars in secondary habitats represent
those bounded by extensive marginal wetlands. Letters represent the
significance at α = 0.05 based on pairwise contrasts and test
slices.Among nested secondary habitats
(Figure ), THg concentrations
differed within rivers
(F2,436.1 = 84.1, p <
0.0001), wetlands (F2,427.7 = 7.74, p = 0.0005), and streams (F2.430.8 = 7.69, p = 0.0005) but not lakes (F2,424.6 = 0.29, p = 0.74) nor ponds (F2,857.2 = 1.42, p = 0.24).
In rivers and streams, THg concentrations were 71% and 76% higher,
respectively, in sites with adjacent riparian wetlands and floodplains
(rivers, F1,431.8 = 4.43, p = 0.03; streams, F1,431.4 = 14.9, p < 0.0001). However, perennial and intermittent streams
without marginal wetlands did not differ from one another (F1,430.5 = 0.85, p = 0.36),
suggesting that the proximity to wetlands may have a stronger influence
on MeHg bioaccumulation in streams than water permanence. In contrast,
within wetlands themselves, seasonally inundated emergent and forested
wetlands had 58% and 112% higher THg concentrations, respectively,
than permanently inundated wetlands (emergent, F1,427.9 = 6.81, p = 0.009; forested, F1,425.5 = 6.81, p < 0.0001).
Across all of the secondary habitats, dragonflies from perennial rivers
with marginal wetlands (the habitat with the highest concentrations)
were 3.1-fold higher than those from the lowest habitat (permanent
emergent wetlands). Although differences were not consistently significant
in all habitat types, those bounded by marginal wetlands averaged
THg concentrations that were 35% higher than similar habitats without
wetlands.These habitat differences further highlight the importance
of ecological
factors as key drivers of spatial variability in biological Hg concentrations.
Hg exposure being the highest in lotic and lowest in lentic habitats
is consistent with other independent data sets, where fish THg concentrations
were 21%–61% higher in lotic than lentic waterbodies across
western North America[7] and northeastern
US lakes.[32] An important caveat to this
is that dragonfly larvae THg concentrations from lakes (particularly
large lakes) primarily represent a littoral zone analysis and likely
do not effectively integrate pelagic pathways of Hg bioaccumulation.
Importantly, water bodies bounded by extensive wetlands and floodplains
generally had the highest dragonfly THg concentrations, despite lower
concentrations in dragonflies sampled from wetlands themselves (except
seasonal forested wetlands) than in either rivers or streams. Wetlands
are known sites of MeHg production,[33] and
wetland density can be a strong predictor of aqueous MeHg concentrations
of streams.[34,35] The apparent discrepancy between
these habitats may be a function of dissolved organic carbon (DOC)
dynamics. Elevated DOC is common in wetlands, and DOC can both promote
MeHg production and transport but also inhibit MeHg bioaccumulation.[36−38] Thus, high DOC in wetlands can result in lower MeHg bioaccumulation
factors within wetlands themselves by binding MeHg and making it less
bioavailable.[39] At the same time, DOC can
facilitate THg and MeHg transport to surrounding rivers and streams
where it may become more bioavailable in a lower DOC environment.
Indeed, dragonfly THg concentrations were positively correlated with
lake DOC concentrations across a series of lakes in the northeastern
US, but the DOC inhibition effect was observed in bioaccumulation
factors for dragonfly THg across the range of measured DOC.[18]At a broader spatial scale, the influence
of the habitat type and
ecological factors on Hg bioaccumulation is illustrated by differences
among level 1 ecoregions, which represent broad areas of similar geography,
geology, climate, and basic biological organization, which in turn
influence the structure and function of specific ecosystems.[40] After statistically accounting for taxonomy,
habitat, and site, we found substantial variation in THg concentrations
among these ecoregions (Figure S3), with
a 3.6-fold range in THg concentrations between the lowest (Great Plains)
and the highest (North American Deserts) ecoregions. Arid ecoregions
such as North American Deserts and Southern Semiarid Highlands were
particularly elevated in THg concentrations, both in the studied dragonflies
and in previously reported fishes across western North America,[7] whereas THg concentrations in Taiga were similarly
low in both dragonflies and fish. Hydrology can be an important driver
of MeHg production and bioaccumulation,[41] and arid ecoregions represent areas where many waterbodies are only
seasonally inundated and anthropogenic water impoundments (i.e., reservoirs)
are widespread. Drying and rewetting of littoral sediments inherent
to reservoirs can exacerbate Hg methylation and increase MeHg bioaccumulation
in food webs both within and downstream of impoundments,[42−44] which may influence dragonfly THg concentrations in these arid areas.
Similarly, we found that dragonflies from seasonal wetlands had substantially
higher THg concentrations than those from permanently inundated wetlands,
findings consistent with those of others from managed wetland systems
where cyclic wetting and drying patterns allowed for the reoxidation
of terminal electron acceptors that are important for MeHg production.[9,45,46]
Intrinsic Drivers: Taxonomy
and Body Size
Taxonomy
can influence Hg concentrations across phylogenetic categories because
it incorporates differences in foraging ecology, habitat use, and
bioenergetics. Consistent with this, we found that THg concentrations
(ng/g dw) differed among larval dragonfly families (F4,14585 = 251.0, p < 0.0001; Figure S4). Aeshnidae (141 ± 11.0) had the
highest THg concentrations, followed by both Macromiidae (131 ±
10.9) and Cordulegastridae (131 ± 10.7), which did not differ
from one another. Libellulidae and Corduliidae (116 ± 9.0), which
were categorized together because of the uncertainties in their differentiation
at this resolution, were significantly lower than the preceding three
families but higher than Gomphidae (95.0 ± 7.5), which had the
lowest THg concentrations, and were 1.5 times lower on average than
Aeshnids (Figure S4).The mechanisms
for taxonomic differences require more study but are likely tied to
some combination of foraging ecology, habitat use, and physiology.[47] Dragonfly larvae are commonly described in terms
of one of four categories: claspers (Aeshnidae), sprawlers (Macromiidae,
Corduliidae, Libellulidae), hiders (Cordulegastridae), and burrowers
(Gomphidae), which represent their preferred microhabitats and activity
levels.[15] Although some species in each
family fall into different categories, these generalized microhabitat
distinctions likely influence both diet and energetics. We limited
our identification to the family level, which may add unexplained
variation if species–specific differences in THg bioaccumulation
are pronounced within families. This requires further investigation,
but there was low variation among Gomphidae species across 17 lakes
in the Laurentian Great Lakes region.[17]Resilience to the confounding effects of intrinsic factors
that
influence Hg concentrations is among the most important aspects of
effective Hg biosentinels. Of the two common intrinsic factors that
we examined (body size[48] and taxonomy[7]), which integrate other important factors such
as foraging ecology and physiology, only taxonomy consistently influenced
THg concentrations. However, paired geometric mean THg concentrations
of dragonfly larvae sampled from the same location at the same time
were strongly correlated among all family pairs (Figure ; equations S1–S5), except Macromiidae and Cordulegastridae, a pair
we could not test because they were concurrently sampled at only five
sites. These relationships between families at a national scale facilitate
a simple approach to reliably convert THg concentrations from one
family to those of another family, making it possible for equivalent
comparisons among locations or over time where the same families were
not sampled. Similar approaches have been used for both wildlife and
fish[27,49] to ensure robust comparisons among locations
or to estimate the likely wildlife Hg exposure on the basis of their
prey.[50,51] To facilitate the use of dragonfly THg data
across landscapes where the same families may not be sampled, we provide
regressions for each family pair in Supporting Information.
Figure 3
Relationships of total mercury (THg) concentrations in
dragonfly
larvae among families. Each data point represents a paired site–year
geometric mean THg concentration for each family. The x-axis represents geometric mean concentrations for the family listed
in each pane; y-axis represents paired THg concentrations
in the Aeshnidae family. Libellulidae and Corduliidae are combined
as a single family group because their distinction can be uncertain
without the identification of the genus.
Relationships of total mercury (THg) concentrations in
dragonfly
larvae among families. Each data point represents a paired site–year
geometric mean THg concentration for each family. The x-axis represents geometric mean concentrations for the family listed
in each pane; y-axis represents paired THg concentrations
in the Aeshnidae family. Libellulidae and Corduliidae are combined
as a single family group because their distinction can be uncertain
without the identification of the genus.
Relationships with Fish and Wildlife Hg Exposure
Aeshnid-equivalent
THg concentrations were positively correlated with THg concentrations
in all four fish guilds (Figure ): piscivores (F1,21 =
20.9; p = 0.0002, N = 22 sites),
sunfish (F1,12 = 10.4; p = 0.008, N = 13 sites), salmonids (F1,9 = 15.5; p = 0.004, N = 10 sites), and forage fish (F1,12 =
65.1; p < 0.0001, N = 13 sites),
as well as with those in both salamanders (F1,50 = 45.1; p < 0.0001, N = 51 sites) and frogs (F1,21 = 12.6; p = 0.002, N = 22 sites) (Figure ).
Figure 4
Relationship between
Aeshnid-equivalent dragonfly larvae THg concentrations
(ng/g dw) and THg concentrations (μg/g wet weight (ww)) in four
fish guilds (left panel), salamander tail clips (ng/g dw; top right
panel), and frog toe clips (ng/g dw; bottom right panel. Each data
point represents the paired geometric mean THg concentrations for
sites where both dragonfly larvae and either fish or amphibians were
sampled. Fish THg concentrations are reported in wet weight to facilitate
comparisons to common health benchmarks, whereas dragonfly larvae
and amphibian concentrations are reported on a dry weight basis to
reduce variance associated with external moisture.
Relationship between
Aeshnid-equivalent dragonfly larvae THg concentrations
(ng/g dw) and THg concentrations (μg/g wet weight (ww)) in four
fish guilds (left panel), salamander tail clips (ng/g dw; top right
panel), and frog toe clips (ng/g dw; bottom right panel. Each data
point represents the paired geometric mean THg concentrations for
sites where both dragonfly larvae and either fish or amphibians were
sampled. Fish THg concentrations are reported in wet weight to facilitate
comparisons to common health benchmarks, whereas dragonfly larvae
and amphibian concentrations are reported on a dry weight basis to
reduce variance associated with external moisture.The ability to predict THg concentrations in other components
of
aquatic food webs is a particularly important aspect of dragonflies
as Hg biosentinels. These relationships, spanning classes of organisms
as well as guilds within them, at a national scale, suggests transferability
to broad scales and across ecosystems. These findings provide the
underpinnings of a tool for estimating the potential risk due to Hg
exposure across multiple taxa. Haro et al.[17] similarly showed strong relationships between site-specific THg
concentrations in Gomphidae and those in both forage fish and predatory
fish. However, they estimated that Gomphidae THg concentrations of
40 ng/g of dw were associated with muscle THg concentrations in predatory
fishes equivalent to the US EPA MeHg criterion value for the protection
of human health (0.30 μg/g of wet weight (ww)). Our findings
for piscivorous fishes were substantially more conservative, suggesting
that the EPA criterion was reached when Aeshnid-equivalent THg concentrations
exceeded 162 ng/g of dw, which corresponds to approximately 112 ng/g
in Gomphidae. The reason for this discrepancy is unclear but could
be associated with differences in the geographic scale of these studies
(i.e., models derived from similar habitats and a narrower geographic
region (Great Lakes region) as opposed to those from a more diverse
assortment of habitats at a continental scale). Alternatively, it
could simply be the result of different statistical approaches used
to generate site-specific mean THg concentrations (geometric means
vs arithmetic means). Regardless, the similar strength and slopes
of the relationships between the two studies highlight the utility
of using dragonflies as an index of fish Hg exposure across a variety
of scales.
Integrated Impairment Index
Dietary-
and tissue-based
impairment benchmarks provide estimates of the potential toxicological
risk of Hg to fish and wildlife[52−55] as well as to humans through fish consumption.[56] For each fish guild, we used the linear regressions
described above to model the Aeshnid-equivalent THg concentrations
that would be indicative of levels exceeding published health benchmarks
that span a range of potential hazard (Table S5). We also modeled the Aeshnid-equivalent THg concentrations that
would correspond with each fish guild (except forage fish) exceeding
US EPA methylmercury criterion (0.30 μg/g of ww) for the protection
of human health.[56]Using these benchmarks,
in concert with the corresponding dragonfly THg concentrations for
different fish guilds, we classified Aeshnid-equivalent THg concentrations
into five indices of progressively increasing severity that incorporated
both the magnitude of potential impairment as well as the number of
guilds exceeding these individual benchmarks (Figure , Table S5). As
opposed to simply evaluating individual species, this approach considers
the potential risk across multiple guilds, allowing for a broader
assessment of the potential ecological and human health exposure risks
in freshwater ecosystems. The established impairment benchmarks are
still lacking for other taxa, such as amphibians, but their correlations
with dragonfly larvae suggest that the development of benchmarks could
lead to further refinements of integrated impairment assessments.
Figure 5
Integrated
impairment indices for potential ecosystem risk to mercury,
in Aeshnid-equivalent units (ng/g dry weight total mercury (THg)).
Integrated impairment index categories (specified by different colored
boxes) represent concentrations corresponding to exceedances of a
range of individual published toxicity benchmarks[53−55] across several
fish guilds (piscivores, sunfish, salmonids, and forage fish). Within
each of these guilds, the potential impairment was assessed based
on (1) fish diet (i.e., risk to other fish as prey), (2) fish tissue
(labeled as fish health; i.e., risk to fish themselves based on their
tissue concentrations), and (3) avian diet (i.e., risk to fish-eating
birds as prey), with three possible levels of severity (low, moderate,
and high as white, grey, and black arrows, respectively) for each
of these benchmark types. Potential human risk is incorporated through
the US EPA methylmercury criterion for the protection of human health,
which was converted to a whole-body equivalent.[7] The integrated impairment indices are defined by the number
and severity of benchmarks exceeded as well as the number of guilds
exceeding them. The symbols and lines represent the modeled Aeshnid-equivalent
THg concentrations associated with the THg concentrations of each
impairment benchmark for each fish guild. Circles represent fish dietary
benchmarks, triangles represent fish health benchmarks, diamonds represent
avian dietary benchmarks, and squares represent US EPA MeHg criterion.
White, gray, and black symbols reflect low, moderate, and high-severity
benchmarks, respectively.
Integrated
impairment indices for potential ecosystem risk to mercury,
in Aeshnid-equivalent units (ng/g dry weight total mercury (THg)).
Integrated impairment index categories (specified by different colored
boxes) represent concentrations corresponding to exceedances of a
range of individual published toxicity benchmarks[53−55] across several
fish guilds (piscivores, sunfish, salmonids, and forage fish). Within
each of these guilds, the potential impairment was assessed based
on (1) fish diet (i.e., risk to other fish as prey), (2) fish tissue
(labeled as fish health; i.e., risk to fish themselves based on their
tissue concentrations), and (3) avian diet (i.e., risk to fish-eating
birds as prey), with three possible levels of severity (low, moderate,
and high as white, grey, and black arrows, respectively) for each
of these benchmark types. Potential human risk is incorporated through
the US EPA methylmercury criterion for the protection of human health,
which was converted to a whole-body equivalent.[7] The integrated impairment indices are defined by the number
and severity of benchmarks exceeded as well as the number of guilds
exceeding them. The symbols and lines represent the modeled Aeshnid-equivalent
THg concentrations associated with the THg concentrations of each
impairment benchmark for each fish guild. Circles represent fish dietary
benchmarks, triangles represent fish health benchmarks, diamonds represent
avian dietary benchmarks, and squares represent US EPA MeHg criterion.
White, gray, and black symbols reflect low, moderate, and high-severity
benchmarks, respectively.This integrated approach allows resource managers to simultaneously
evaluate the potential exposure and hazard across a range of ecological
receptors to more thoroughly assess the threat Hg may pose to ecosystem
function. Overall, 10% of the 877 site–years had geometric
mean Aeshnid-equivalent THg concentrations that were below any of
the deleterious effect benchmarks, and 22% were associated with the
low-hazard index. In contrast, more than half of the site–years
(56%) were categorized as moderate hazards. Finally, 11 and 1% of
sites had geometric mean Aeshnid-equivalent THg concentrations that
were high enough for them to be classified in the high- or severe-hazard
indices, respectively. Geographically, the distribution of risk categories
was heterogeneous across the continent (Figure ). Moreover, within individual park units
there were often sites that spanned the entire range of benchmark
categories (Figure ).
Figure 6
Integrated impairment indices for all 457 sites sampled between
2009 and 2018. Integrated impairment indices are derived from Aeshnid-equivalent
geometric mean THg concentrations for each site–year and their
corresponding association with Hg exposure in fish and other wildlife.
The inset for the cumulative frequency distribution illustrates the
proportion of sites and years that fall into each of the five categories.
Note that the map geography was altered to include Alaska and Hawaii
within the map frame.
Integrated impairment indices for all 457 sites sampled between
2009 and 2018. Integrated impairment indices are derived from Aeshnid-equivalent
geometric mean THg concentrations for each site–year and their
corresponding association with Hg exposure in fish and other wildlife.
The inset for the cumulative frequency distribution illustrates the
proportion of sites and years that fall into each of the five categories.
Note that the map geography was altered to include Alaska and Hawaii
within the map frame.The national-scale citizen-science
network leveraged herein represents
the most expansive assessment of the MeHg distribution and the potential
impairment risk using aquatic macroinvertebrates as biosentinels.
We show that dragonfly larvae provide an effective model for understanding
important factors of Hg bioaccumulation and can be used to estimate
potential ecosystem impairment. We also demonstrate that widespread
Hg contamination in protected NPS lands poses risks to trust resources
within them. Utilizing a citizen-science framework also provides a
cost-effective approach for biological sampling while also engaging
the public in experiential learning opportunities. Future applications
of dragonfly larvae Hg monitoring could be particularly insightful
for better understanding the landscape, biogeochemical, and climatological
drivers of Hg availability to aquatic food webs; predicting the potential
risk to vertebrates; and evaluating the effectiveness of Hg reductions,
both regionally and globally.
Authors: Paul M Bradley; Celeste A Journey; Mark E Brigham; Douglas A Burns; Daniel T Button; Karen Riva-Murray Journal: Environ Pollut Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 8.071
Authors: John Chételat; Murray C Richardson; Gwyneth A MacMillan; Marc Amyot; Alexandre J Poulain Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2017-12-12 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Celia Y Chen; Charles T Driscoll; Collin A Eagles-Smith; Chris S Eckley; David A Gay; Heileen Hsu-Kim; Susan E Keane; Jane L Kirk; Robert P Mason; Daniel Obrist; Henrik Selin; Noelle E Selin; Marcella R Thompson Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2018-08-20 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Hannah J Broadley; Kathryn L Cottingham; Nicholas A Baer; Kathleen C Weathers; Holly A Ewing; Ramsa Chaves-Ulloa; Jessica Chickering; Adam M Wilson; Jenisha Shrestha; Celia Y Chen Journal: Ecotoxicology Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Allyson Jackson; David C Evers; Collin A Eagles-Smith; Joshua T Ackerman; James J Willacker; John E Elliott; Jesse M Lepak; Stacy S Vander Pol; Colleen E Bryan Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2016-03-17 Impact factor: 7.963