Literature DB >> 26826095

From tails to toes: developing nonlethal tissue indicators of mercury exposure in five amphibian species.

Adam Z Pfleeger1,2, Collin A Eagles-Smith3, Brandon M Kowalski4, Garth Herring4, James J Willacker4, Allyson K Jackson1, John R Pierce4.   

Abstract

Exposure to environmental contaminants has been implicated as a factor in global amphibian decline. Mercury (Hg) is a particularly widespread contaminant that biomagnifies in amphibians and can cause a suite of deleterious effects. However, monitoring contaminant exposure in amphibian tissues may conflict with conservation goals if lethal take is required. Thus, there is a need to develop non-lethal tissue sampling techniques to quantify contaminant exposure in amphibians. Some minimally invasive sampling techniques, such as toe-clipping, are common in population-genetic research, but it is unclear if these methods can adequately characterize contaminant exposure. We examined the relationships between mercury (Hg) concentrations in non-lethally sampled tissues and paired whole-bodies in five amphibian species. Specifically, we examined the utility of three different tail-clip sections from four salamander species and toe-clips from one anuran species. Both tail and toe-clips accurately predicted whole-body THg concentrations, but the relationships differed among species and the specific tail-clip section or toe that was used. Tail-clips comprised of the distal 0-2 cm segment performed the best across all salamander species, explaining between 82 and 92% of the variation in paired whole-body THg concentrations. Toe-clips were less effective predictors of frog THg concentrations, but THg concentrations in outer rear toes accounted for up to 79% of the variability in frog whole-body THg concentrations. These findings suggest non-lethal sampling of tails and toes has potential applications for monitoring contaminant exposure and risk in amphibians, but care must be taken to ensure consistent collection and interpretation of samples.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amphibian; Mercury; Non-lethal; Tail-clip; Toe-clip

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26826095     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-016-1616-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  16 in total

1.  Mercury in fish scales as an assessment method for predicting muscle tissue mercury concentrations in largemouth bass.

Authors:  J L Lake; S A Ryba; J R Serbst; A D Libby
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Integrating toxicity risk in bird eggs and chicks: using chick down feathers to estimate mercury concentrations in eggs.

Authors:  Joshua T Ackerman; Collin A Eagles-Smith
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Biomagnification of mercury in aquatic food webs: a worldwide meta-analysis.

Authors:  Raphael A Lavoie; Timothy D Jardine; Matthew M Chumchal; Karen A Kidd; Linda M Campbell
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Mercury correlations among six tissues for four waterbird species breeding in San Francisco Bay, California, USA.

Authors:  Collin A Eagles-Smith; Joshua T Ackerman; Terrence L Adelsbach; John Y Takekawa; A Keith Miles; Robin A Keister
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.742

5.  Evaluation of the suitability of application of golden jackal (Canis aureus) hair as a noninvasive technique for determination of body burden mercury.

Authors:  Hassan Malvandi; Seyed Mahmoud Ghasempouri; Abbas Esmaili-Sari; Nader Bahramifar
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Use of toe clips as a nonlethal index of mercury accumulation and maternal transfer in amphibians.

Authors:  Brian D Todd; Christine M Bergeron; William A Hopkins
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Interactive effects of maternal and dietary mercury exposure have latent and lethal consequences for amphibian larvae.

Authors:  Christine M Bergeron; William A Hopkins; Brian D Todd; Mark J Hepner; Jason M Unrine
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Mercury accumulation along a contamination gradient and nondestructive indices of bioaccumulation in amphibians.

Authors:  Christine M Bergeron; Catherine M Bodinof; Jason M Unrine; William A Hopkins
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.742

9.  Adverse effects of ecologically relevant dietary mercury exposure in southern leopard frog (Rana sphenocephala) larvae.

Authors:  Jason M Unrine; Charles H Jagoe; William A Hopkins; Heather A Brant
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.742

10.  Implementation of a non-lethal biopsy punch monitoring program for mercury in smallmouth bass, Micropterus dolomieu Lacepède, from the Eleven Point River, Missouri.

Authors:  J R Ackerson; M J McKee; C J Schmitt; W G Brumbaugh
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.151

View more
  2 in total

1.  Timber harvest alters mercury bioaccumulation and food web structure in headwater streams.

Authors:  James J Willacker; Collin A Eagles-Smith; Brandon M Kowalski; Robert J Danehy; Allyson K Jackson; Evan M Adams; David C Evers; Chris S Eckley; Michael T Tate; David P Krabbenhoft
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2019-07-06       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  A National-Scale Assessment of Mercury Bioaccumulation in United States National Parks Using Dragonfly Larvae As Biosentinels through a Citizen-Science Framework.

Authors:  Collin A Eagles-Smith; James J Willacker; Sarah J Nelson; Colleen M Flanagan Pritz; David P Krabbenhoft; Celia Y Chen; Joshua T Ackerman; Evan H Campbell Grant; David S Pilliod
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 9.028

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.