Literature DB >> 31831233

Methylmercury exposure in wildlife: A review of the ecological and physiological processes affecting contaminant concentrations and their interpretation.

John Chételat1, Joshua T Ackerman2, Collin A Eagles-Smith3, Craig E Hebert4.   

Abstract

Exposure to methylmercury (MeHg) can result in detrimental health effects in wildlife. With advances in ecological indicators and analytical techniques for measurement of MeHg in a variety of tissues, numerous processes have been identified that can influence MeHg concentrations in wildlife. This review presents a synthesis of theoretical principals and applied information for measuring MeHg exposure and interpreting MeHg concentrations in wildlife. Mercury concentrations in wildlife are the net result of ecological processes influencing dietary exposure combined with physiological processes that regulate assimilation, transformation, and elimination. Therefore, consideration of both physiological and ecological processes should be integrated when formulating biomonitoring strategies. Ecological indicators, particularly stable isotopes of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur, compound-specific stable isotopes, and fatty acids, can be effective tools to evaluate dietary MeHg exposure. Animal species differ in their physiological capacity for MeHg elimination, and animal tissues can be inert or physiologically active, act as sites of storage, transformation, or excretion of MeHg, and vary in the timing of MeHg exposure they represent. Biological influences such as age, sex, maternal transfer, and growth or fasting are also relevant for interpretation of tissue MeHg concentrations. Wildlife tissues that represent current or near-term bioaccumulation and in which MeHg is the predominant mercury species (such as blood and eggs) are most effective for biomonitoring ecosystems and understanding landscape drivers of MeHg exposure. Further research is suggested to critically evaluate the use of keratinized external tissues to measure MeHg bioaccumulation, particularly for less-well studied wildlife such as reptiles and terrestrial mammals. Suggested methods are provided to effectively use wildlife for quantifying patterns and drivers of MeHg bioaccumulation over time and space, as well as for assessing the potential risk and toxicological effects of MeHg on wildlife. Crown
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood; Dietary tracers; Eggs; Feather; Foraging ecology; Hair

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31831233     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  7 in total

1.  Avian influenza antibody prevalence increases with mercury contamination in wild waterfowl.

Authors:  Claire S Teitelbaum; Joshua T Ackerman; Mason A Hill; Jacqueline M Satter; Michael L Casazza; Susan E W De La Cruz; Walter M Boyce; Evan J Buck; John M Eadie; Mark P Herzog; Elliott L Matchett; Cory T Overton; Sarah H Peterson; Magdalena Plancarte; Andrew M Ramey; Jeffery D Sullivan; Diann J Prosser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 5.530

Review 2.  Internal Dynamics and Metabolism of Mercury in Biota: A Review of Insights from Mercury Stable Isotopes.

Authors:  Mi-Ling Li; Sae Yun Kwon; Brett A Poulin; Martin Tsz-Ki Tsui; Laura C Motta; Moonkyoung Cho
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-06-19       Impact factor: 11.357

3.  Mercury biogeochemical cycling: A synthesis of recent scientific advances.

Authors:  Mae Sexauer Gustin; Michael S Bank; Kevin Bishop; Katlin Bowman; Brian Branfireun; John Chételat; Chris S Eckley; Chad R Hammerschmidt; Carl Lamborg; Seth Lyman; Antonio Martínez-Cortizas; Jonas Sommar; Martin Tsz-Ki Tsui; Tong Zhang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Mercury bioaccumulation in freshwater fishes of the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

Authors:  James J Willacker; Collin A Eagles-Smith; Vicki S Blazer
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  A National-Scale Assessment of Mercury Bioaccumulation in United States National Parks Using Dragonfly Larvae As Biosentinels through a Citizen-Science Framework.

Authors:  Collin A Eagles-Smith; James J Willacker; Sarah J Nelson; Colleen M Flanagan Pritz; David P Krabbenhoft; Celia Y Chen; Joshua T Ackerman; Evan H Campbell Grant; David S Pilliod
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Foraging Ecology Differentiates Life Stages and Mercury Exposure in Common Terns (Sterna hirundo).

Authors:  Annie M Bracey; Matthew A Etterson; Frederick C Strand; Sumner W Matteson; Gerald J Niemi; Francesca J Cuthbert; Joel C Hoffman
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  RNA sequencing and proteomic profiling reveal different alterations by dietary methylmercury in the hippocampal transcriptome and proteome in BALB/c mice.

Authors:  Ragnhild Marie Mellingen; Lene Secher Myrmel; Kai Kristoffer Lie; Josef Daniel Rasinger; Lise Madsen; Ole Jakob Nøstbakken
Journal:  Metallomics       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.526

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.