Literature DB >> 32632740

Sample-size determination for the Bayesian t test and Welch's test using the approximate adjusted fractional Bayes factor.

Qianrao Fu1, Herbert Hoijtink2, Mirjam Moerbeek2.   

Abstract

When two independent means μ1 and μ2 are compared, H0 : μ1 = μ2, H1 : μ1≠μ2, and H2 : μ1 > μ2 are the hypotheses of interest. This paper introduces the R package SSDbain, which can be used to determine the sample size needed to evaluate these hypotheses using the approximate adjusted fractional Bayes factor (AAFBF) implemented in the R package bain. Both the Bayesian t test and the Bayesian Welch's test are available in this R package. The sample size required will be calculated such that the probability that the Bayes factor is larger than a threshold value is at least η if either the null or alternative hypothesis is true. Using the R package SSDbain and/or the tables provided in this paper, psychological researchers can easily determine the required sample size for their experiments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayes factor; Bayesian Welch’s test; Bayesian t test; SSDbain; Sample-size determination

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32632740      PMCID: PMC7880954          DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01408-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  10 in total

1.  Null hypothesis significance testing: a review of an old and continuing controversy.

Authors:  R S Nickerson
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2000-06

2.  The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: causes, consequences, and remedies.

Authors:  Scott E Maxwell
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2004-06

3.  Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences.

Authors:  Felix D Schönbrodt; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Michael Zehetleitner; Marco Perugini
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2015-12-14

4.  Inequality constrained analysis of variance: a Bayesian approach.

Authors:  Irene Klugkist; Olav Laudy; Herbert Hoijtink
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2005-12

Review 5.  Managing heteroscedasticity in general linear models.

Authors:  Patrick J Rosopa; Meline M Schaffer; Amber N Schroeder
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2013-09

6.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  p-Curve and Effect Size: Correcting for Publication Bias Using Only Significant Results.

Authors:  Uri Simonsohn; Leif D Nelson; Joseph P Simmons
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-11

8.  Safeguard Power as a Protection Against Imprecise Power Estimates.

Authors:  Marco Perugini; Marcello Gallucci; Giulio Costantini
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-05

Review 9.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.

Authors:  Katherine S Button; John P A Ioannidis; Claire Mokrysz; Brian A Nosek; Jonathan Flint; Emma S J Robinson; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Sample-Size Planning for More Accurate Statistical Power: A Method Adjusting Sample Effect Sizes for Publication Bias and Uncertainty.

Authors:  Samantha F Anderson; Ken Kelley; Scott E Maxwell
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-09-13
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Art Training in Dementia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Katherine G Johnson; Annalise A D'Souza; Melody Wiseheart
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-12-15

2.  Bayesian updating: increasing sample size during the course of a study.

Authors:  Mirjam Moerbeek
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.615

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.