Literature DB >> 28902575

Sample-Size Planning for More Accurate Statistical Power: A Method Adjusting Sample Effect Sizes for Publication Bias and Uncertainty.

Samantha F Anderson1, Ken Kelley1, Scott E Maxwell1.   

Abstract

The sample size necessary to obtain a desired level of statistical power depends in part on the population value of the effect size, which is, by definition, unknown. A common approach to sample-size planning uses the sample effect size from a prior study as an estimate of the population value of the effect to be detected in the future study. Although this strategy is intuitively appealing, effect-size estimates, taken at face value, are typically not accurate estimates of the population effect size because of publication bias and uncertainty. We show that the use of this approach often results in underpowered studies, sometimes to an alarming degree. We present an alternative approach that adjusts sample effect sizes for bias and uncertainty, and we demonstrate its effectiveness for several experimental designs. Furthermore, we discuss an open-source R package, BUCSS, and user-friendly Web applications that we have made available to researchers so that they can easily implement our suggested methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  effect size; methodology; publication bias; sample size; statistical power

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28902575     DOI: 10.1177/0956797617723724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  40 in total

1.  The Interpretation of Statistical Power after the Data have been Gathered.

Authors:  John J Dziak; Lisa C Dierker; Beau Abar
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2018-10-02

2.  Generic language in scientific communication.

Authors:  Jasmine M DeJesus; Maureen A Callanan; Graciela Solis; Susan A Gelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  When masters of abstraction run into a concrete wall: Experts failing arithmetic word problems.

Authors:  Hippolyte Gros; Emmanuel Sander; Jean-Pierre Thibaut
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

4.  The role of arousal in boundary judgement errors.

Authors:  Deanne M Green; Jessica A Wilcock; Melanie K T Takarangi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-07

5.  Intrusive memories and voluntary memory of a trauma film: Differential effects of a cognitive interference task after encoding.

Authors:  Alex Lau-Zhu; Richard N Henson; Emily A Holmes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-04-25

6.  Predictors of Attrition in Longitudinal Neuroimaging Research: Inhibitory Control, Head Movement, and Resting-State Functional Connectivity.

Authors:  Jonathan P Stange; Lisanne M Jenkins; Katie L Bessette; Leah R Kling; John S Bark; Robert Shepard; Elissa J Hamlat; Sophie DelDonno; K Luan Phan; Alessandra M Passarotti; Olusola Ajilore; Scott A Langenecker
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2018-11

Review 7.  Basic statistical considerations for physiology: The journal Temperature toolbox.

Authors:  Aaron R Caldwell; Samuel N Cheuvront
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2019-06-25

8.  The role of emotion arousal in the retrieval practice effect.

Authors:  Xi Jia; Chuanji Gao; Lixia Cui; Chunyan Guo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Attitudes Towards Seeking Psychological Help: An Integrative Model Based on Contact, Essentialist Beliefs About Mental Illness, and Stigma.

Authors:  Alexandra Hantzi; Fotios Anagnostopoulos; Eva Alexiou
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2019-06

10.  The effects of posture on mind wandering.

Authors:  Xinrui Yang; Binbin Qian; Xinqi Zhou; Yajun Zhao; Lu Wang; Zhijun Zhang
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.