Literature DB >> 32628089

Differentiating glioblastoma multiforme from cerebral lymphoma: application of advanced texture analysis of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients.

Mehrsad Mehrnahad1, Sara Rostami2, Farnaz Kimia1, Reza Kord1, Morteza Sanei Taheri1, Hamidreza Saligheh Rad3, Hamidreza Haghighatkhah1, Afshin Moradi4, Ali Kord2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to differentiate glioblastoma multiforme from primary central nervous system lymphoma using the customised first and second-order histogram features derived from apparent diffusion coefficients.Methods and materials: A total of 82 patients (57 with glioblastoma multiforme and 25 with primary central nervous system lymphoma) were included in this study. The axial T1 post-contrast and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance images were used to delineate regions of interest for the tumour and peritumoral oedema. The regions of interest were then co-registered with the apparent diffusion coefficient maps, and the first and second-order histogram features were extracted and compared between glioblastoma multiforme and primary central nervous system lymphoma groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to calculate a cut-off value and its sensitivity and specificity to differentiate glioblastoma multiforme from primary central nervous system lymphoma.
RESULTS: Based on the tumour regions of interest, apparent diffusion coefficient mean, maximum, median, uniformity and entropy were higher in the glioblastoma multiforme group than the primary central nervous system lymphoma group (P ≤ 0.001). The most sensitive first and second-order histogram feature to differentiate glioblastoma multiforme from primary central nervous system lymphoma was the maximum of 2.026 or less (95% confidence interval (CI) 75.1-99.9%), and the most specific first and second-order histogram feature was smoothness of 1.28 or greater (84.0% CI 70.9-92.8%). Based on the oedema regions of interest, most of the first and second-order histogram features were higher in the glioblastoma multiforme group compared to the primary central nervous system lymphoma group (P ≤ 0.015). The most sensitive first and second-order histogram feature to differentiate glioblastoma multiforme from primary central nervous system lymphoma was the 25th percentile of 0.675 or less (100% CI 83.2-100%) and the most specific first and second-order histogram feature was the median of 1.28 or less (85.9% CI 66.3-95.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: Texture analysis using first and second-order histogram features derived from apparent diffusion coefficient maps may be helpful in differentiating glioblastoma multiforme from primary central nervous system lymphoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Texture analysis; apparent diffusion coefficient; glioblastoma multiforme; lymphoma; receiver operating characteristic

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32628089      PMCID: PMC7482046          DOI: 10.1177/1971400920937382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiol J        ISSN: 1971-4009


  35 in total

1.  Accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging-magnetic resonance in differentiating functional from non-functional pituitary macro-adenoma and classification of tumor consistency.

Authors:  Morteza Sanei Taheri; Farnaz Kimia; Mersad Mehrnahad; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad; Hamidreza Haghighatkhah; Afshin Moradi; Anahita Fathi Kazerooni; Mohammadreza Alviri; Abdorrahim Absalan
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2018-12-03

2.  Diffusion Profiling via a Histogram Approach Distinguishes Low-grade from High-grade Meningiomas, Can Reflect the Respective Proliferative Potential and Progesterone Receptor Status.

Authors:  Georg Alexander Gihr; Diana Horvath-Rizea; Nikita Garnov; Patricia Kohlhof-Meinecke; Oliver Ganslandt; Hans Henkes; Hans Jonas Meyer; Karl-Titus Hoffmann; Alexey Surov; Stefan Schob
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Atypical diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance findings in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  A Batra; R P Tripathi
Journal:  Australas Radiol       Date:  2004-09

4.  Diffusion-tensor MR imaging of intracranial neoplasia and associated peritumoral edema: introduction of the tumor infiltration index.

Authors:  Stanley Lu; Daniel Ahn; Glyn Johnson; Meng Law; David Zagzag; Robert I Grossman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Perfusion and diffusion MR imaging in enhancing malignant cerebral tumors.

Authors:  Cem Calli; Omer Kitis; Nilgun Yunten; Taskin Yurtseven; Sertac Islekel; Taner Akalin
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Novel Radiomic Features Based on Joint Intensity Matrices for Predicting Glioblastoma Patient Survival Time.

Authors:  Ahmad Chaddad; Paul Daniel; Christian Desrosiers; Matthew Toews; Bassam Abdulkarim
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 5.772

Review 7.  A Review on a Deep Learning Perspective in Brain Cancer Classification.

Authors:  Gopal S Tandel; Mainak Biswas; Omprakash G Kakde; Ashish Tiwari; Harman S Suri; Monica Turk; John R Laird; Christopher K Asare; Annabel A Ankrah; N N Khanna; B K Madhusudhan; Luca Saba; Jasjit S Suri
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 8.  Imaging biomarkers in oncology: Basics and application to MRI.

Authors:  Isabel Dregely; Davide Prezzi; Christian Kelly-Morland; Elisa Roccia; Radhouene Neji; Vicky Goh
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Assessment of the Prognostic Value of Radiomic Features in 18F-FMISO PET Imaging of Hypoxia in Postsurgery Brain Cancer Patients: Secondary Analysis of Imaging Data from a Single-Center Study and the Multicenter ACRIN 6684 Trial.

Authors:  Mark Muzi; Eric Wolsztynski; James R Fink; Janet N O'Sullivan; Finbarr O'Sullivan; Kenneth A Krohn; David A Mankoff
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2020-03

10.  A simple model for glioma grading based on texture analysis applied to conventional brain MRI.

Authors:  José Gerardo Suárez-García; Javier Miguel Hernández-López; Eduardo Moreno-Barbosa; Benito de Celis-Alonso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Diagnostic Accuracy of the Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Method Used in Association With the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Differentiating Between Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and High-Grade Glioma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoli Du; Yue He; Wei Lin
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.086

2.  Diagnostic efficacy of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in differentiation of malignant intra-axial brain tumors

Authors:  İlker Eyüboğlu; İsmet Miraç Çakir; Serdar Aslan; Ahmet Sari
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 0.973

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.