Georg Alexander Gihr1, Diana Horvath-Rizea1, Nikita Garnov2, Patricia Kohlhof-Meinecke3, Oliver Ganslandt4, Hans Henkes1, Hans Jonas Meyer5, Karl-Titus Hoffmann6, Alexey Surov5, Stefan Schob7. 1. Clinic for Neuroradiology, Katharinenhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany. 2. Eichamt Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. 3. Department for Pathology, Katharinenhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany. 4. Neurosurgical Clinic, Katharinenhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany. 5. Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. 6. Department for Neuroradiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. 7. Department for Neuroradiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. Stefan.Schob@Medizin.Uni-Leipzig.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Presurgical grading, estimation of growth kinetics, and other prognostic factors are becoming increasingly important for selecting the best therapeutic approach for meningioma patients. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) provides microstructural information and reflects tumor biology. A novel DWI approach, histogram profiling of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) volumes, provides more distinct information than conventional DWI. Therefore, our study investigated whether ADC histogram profiling distinguishes low-grade from high-grade lesions and reflects Ki-67 expression and progesterone receptor status. PROCEDURES: Pretreatment ADC volumes of 37 meningioma patients (28 low-grade, 9 high-grade) were used for histogram profiling. WHO grade, Ki-67 expression, and progesterone receptor status were evaluated. Comparative and correlative statistics investigating the association between histogram profiling and neuropathology were performed. RESULTS: The entire ADC profile (p10, p25, p75, p90, mean, median) was significantly lower in high-grade versus low-grade meningiomas. The lower percentiles, mean, and modus showed significant correlations with Ki-67 expression. Skewness and entropy of the ADC volumes were significantly associated with progesterone receptor status and Ki-67 expression. ROC analysis revealed entropy to be the most accurate parameter distinguishing low-grade from high-grade meningiomas. CONCLUSIONS: ADC histogram profiling provides a distinct set of parameters, which help differentiate low-grade versus high-grade meningiomas. Also, histogram metrics correlate significantly with histological surrogates of the respective proliferative potential. More specifically, entropy revealed to be the most promising imaging biomarker for presurgical grading. Both, entropy and skewness were significantly associated with progesterone receptor status and Ki-67 expression and therefore should be investigated further as predictors for prognostically relevant tumor biological features. Since absolute ADC values vary between MRI scanners of different vendors and field strengths, their use is more limited in the presurgical setting.
PURPOSE: Presurgical grading, estimation of growth kinetics, and other prognostic factors are becoming increasingly important for selecting the best therapeutic approach for meningiomapatients. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) provides microstructural information and reflects tumor biology. A novel DWI approach, histogram profiling of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) volumes, provides more distinct information than conventional DWI. Therefore, our study investigated whether ADC histogram profiling distinguishes low-grade from high-grade lesions and reflects Ki-67 expression and progesterone receptor status. PROCEDURES: Pretreatment ADC volumes of 37 meningiomapatients (28 low-grade, 9 high-grade) were used for histogram profiling. WHO grade, Ki-67 expression, and progesterone receptor status were evaluated. Comparative and correlative statistics investigating the association between histogram profiling and neuropathology were performed. RESULTS: The entire ADC profile (p10, p25, p75, p90, mean, median) was significantly lower in high-grade versus low-grade meningiomas. The lower percentiles, mean, and modus showed significant correlations with Ki-67 expression. Skewness and entropy of the ADC volumes were significantly associated with progesterone receptor status and Ki-67 expression. ROC analysis revealed entropy to be the most accurate parameter distinguishing low-grade from high-grade meningiomas. CONCLUSIONS: ADC histogram profiling provides a distinct set of parameters, which help differentiate low-grade versus high-grade meningiomas. Also, histogram metrics correlate significantly with histological surrogates of the respective proliferative potential. More specifically, entropy revealed to be the most promising imaging biomarker for presurgical grading. Both, entropy and skewness were significantly associated with progesterone receptor status and Ki-67 expression and therefore should be investigated further as predictors for prognostically relevant tumor biological features. Since absolute ADC values vary between MRI scanners of different vendors and field strengths, their use is more limited in the presurgical setting.
Authors: Jeremy Steinberger; Rachel S Bronheim; Prashant Vempati; Eric K Oermann; Travis R Ladner; Nathan J Lee; Parth Kothari; John M Caridi; Raj K Shrivastava Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: David N Louis; Arie Perry; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Webster K Cavenee; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Paul Kleihues; David W Ellison Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Roland Goldbrunner; Giuseppe Minniti; Matthias Preusser; Michael D Jenkinson; Kita Sallabanda; Emmanuel Houdart; Andreas von Deimling; Pantelis Stavrinou; Florence Lefranc; Morten Lund-Johansen; Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan Moyal; Dieta Brandsma; Roger Henriksson; Riccardo Soffietti; Michael Weller Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Shun Zhang; Gloria Chia-Yi Chiang; Jacquelyn Marion Knapp; Christina M Zecca; Diana He; Rohan Ramakrishna; Rajiv S Magge; David J Pisapia; Howard Alan Fine; Apostolos John Tsiouris; Yize Zhao; Linda A Heier; Yi Wang; Ilhami Kovanlikaya Journal: J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-05-25 Impact factor: 3.447
Authors: J D Baal; W C Chen; D A Solomon; J S Pai; C-H Lucas; J H Hara; N A Oberheim Bush; M W McDermott; D R Raleigh; J E Villanueva-Meyer Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Alexey Surov; Daniel T Ginat; Tchoyoson Lim; Teresa Cabada; Ozdil Baskan; Stefan Schob; Hans Jonas Meyer; Georg Alexander Gihr; Diana Horvath-Rizea; Gordian Hamerla; Karl Titus Hoffmann; Andreas Wienke Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2018-07-11 Impact factor: 4.243