Literature DB >> 16527438

Perfusion and diffusion MR imaging in enhancing malignant cerebral tumors.

Cem Calli1, Omer Kitis, Nilgun Yunten, Taskin Yurtseven, Sertac Islekel, Taner Akalin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Common contrast-enhancing malignant tumors of the brain are glioblastoma multiforme (GBMs), anaplastic astrocytomas (AAs), metastases, and lymphomas, all of which have sometimes similar conventional MRI findings. Our aim was to evaluate the role of perfusion MR imaging (PWI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the differentiation of these contrast-enhancing malignant cerebral tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients with contrast-enhancing and histologically proven brain tumors, 14 AAs, 17 GBMs, nine metastases, and eight lymphomas, were included in the study. All patients have undergone routine MR examination where DWI and PWI were performed in the same session. DWI was performed with b values of 0, 500, and 1000 mm(2)/s. Minimum ADC values (ADC(min)) of each tumor was later calculated from ADC map images. PWI was applied using dynamic susceptibility contrast technique and maximum relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV(max)) was calculated from each tumor, given in ratio with contralateral normal white matter. Comparisons of ADC(min) and rCBV(max) values with the histological types of the enhancing tumors were made with a one-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni test. A P value less than 0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference.
RESULTS: The ADC(min) values (mean+/-S.D.) in GBMs, AAs, lymphomas, and metastases were 0.79+/-0.21 (x10(-3)mm(2)/s), 0.75+/-0.21 (x10(-3)mm(2)/s), 0.51+/-0.09 (x10(-3)mm(2)/s), and 0.68+/-0.11 (x10(-3)mm(2)/s), respectively. The difference in ADC(min) values were statistically significant between lymphomas and GBMs (P<0.05). It was also statistically significant between lymphomas and AAs (P<0.03). However, there were no differences between lymphomas and metastasis, and between GBMs, AAs, and metastasis. The rCBV(max) ratio (mean+/-S.D.) in GBMs were 6.33+/-2.03, whereas it was 3.66+/-1.79 in AAs, 2.33+/-0.68 in lymphomas, and 4.45+/-1.87 in metastases. These values were statistically different between GBMs and AAs (P<0.001), GBMs and lymphoma (P<0.0001). Although there seemed to be difference between GBMs and metastases, it was not statistically significant (P<0.083).
CONCLUSION: Combination of DWI and PWI, with ADC(min) and rCBV(max) calculations, may aid routine MR imaging in the differentiation of common cerebral contrast-enhancing malignant tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16527438     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.12.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  83 in total

1.  Percentage signal recovery derived from MR dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging is useful to differentiate common enhancing malignant lesions of the brain.

Authors:  R Mangla; B Kolar; T Zhu; J Zhong; J Almast; S Ekholm
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  MR Imaging-Based Analysis of Glioblastoma Multiforme: Estimation of IDH1 Mutation Status.

Authors:  K Yamashita; A Hiwatashi; O Togao; K Kikuchi; R Hatae; K Yoshimoto; M Mizoguchi; S O Suzuki; T Yoshiura; H Honda
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  ASFNR recommendations for clinical performance of MR dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging of the brain.

Authors:  K Welker; J Boxerman; A Kalnin; T Kaufmann; M Shiroishi; M Wintermark
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Primary central nervous system lymphoma and atypical glioblastoma: Differentiation using radiomics approach.

Authors:  Hie Bum Suh; Yoon Seong Choi; Sohi Bae; Sung Soo Ahn; Jong Hee Chang; Seok-Gu Kang; Eui Hyun Kim; Se Hoon Kim; Seung-Koo Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Apparent diffusion coefficient obtained by magnetic resonance imaging as a prognostic marker in glioblastomas: correlation with MGMT promoter methylation status.

Authors:  Andrea Romano; L F Calabria; F Tavanti; G Minniti; M C Rossi-Espagnet; V Coppola; S Pugliese; D Guida; G Francione; C Colonnese; L M Fantozzi; A Bozzao
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  MRI biomarkers identify the differential response of glioblastoma multiforme to anti-angiogenic therapy.

Authors:  Shahrzad Jalali; Caroline Chung; Warren Foltz; Kelly Burrell; Sanjay Singh; Richard Hill; Gelareh Zadeh
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  The Combined Performance of ADC, CSF CXC Chemokine Ligand 13, and CSF Interleukin 10 in the Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Lymphoma.

Authors:  M C Mabray; R F Barajas; J E Villanueva-Meyer; C A Zhang; F E Valles; J L Rubenstein; S Cha
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Differentiation between glioblastomas and solitary brain metastases using diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Sumei Wang; Sungheon Kim; Sanjeev Chawla; Ronald L Wolf; Wei-Guo Zhang; Donald M O'Rourke; Kevin D Judy; Elias R Melhem; Harish Poptani
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Ex-vivo HRMAS of adult brain tumours: metabolite quantification and assignment of tumour biomarkers.

Authors:  Alan J Wright; Greg A Fellows; John R Griffiths; M Wilson; B Anthony Bell; Franklyn A Howe
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 27.401

10.  Radiological progression of cerebral metastases after radiosurgery: assessment of perfusion MRI for differentiating between necrosis and recurrence.

Authors:  Friso W A Hoefnagels; Frank J Lagerwaard; Esther Sanchez; Cornelis J A Haasbeek; Dirk L Knol; Ben J Slotman; W Peter Vandertop
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.