Vivian Wan Yu Liao1,2, Ali Saad Kusay1,2, Thomas Balle1,2, Philip Kiaer Ahring1,2. 1. Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, 94 Mallett Street, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia. 2. Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Concatenation of Cys-loop receptor subunits is a commonly used technique to ensure experimental control of receptor assembly. However, we recently demonstrated that widely used constructs did not lead to the expression of uniform pools of ternary and more complex receptors. The aim was therefore to identify viable strategies for designing concatenated constructs that would allow strict control of resultant receptor pools. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Concatenated dimeric, tetrameric, and pentameric α4β2-containing nicotinic ACh (nACh) receptor constructs were designed with successively shorter linker lengths and expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Resulting receptor stoichiometries were investigated by functional analysis in two-electrode voltage-clamp experiments. Molecular dynamics simulations were performed to investigate potential effects of linkers on the 3D structure of concatemers. KEY RESULTS: Dimeric constructs were found to be unreliable and should be avoided for expression of ternary receptors. By introducing two short linkers, we obtained efficient expression of uniform receptor pools with tetrameric and pentameric constructs. However, linkers should not be excessively short as that introduces strain on the 3D structure of concatemers. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The data demonstrate that design of concatenated Cys-loop receptors requires a compromise between the desire for control of assembly and avoiding introduction of strain on the resulting protein. The overall best strategy was found to be pentameric constructs with carefully optimised linker lengths. Our findings will advance studies of ternary or more complex Cys-loop receptors as well as enabling detailed analysis of how pharmacological agents interact with stoichiometry-specific binding sites.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Concatenation of Cys-loop receptor subunits is a commonly used technique to ensure experimental control of receptor assembly. However, we recently demonstrated that widely used constructs did not lead to the expression of uniform pools of ternary and more complex receptors. The aim was therefore to identify viable strategies for designing concatenated constructs that would allow strict control of resultant receptor pools. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Concatenated dimeric, tetrameric, and pentameric α4β2-containing nicotinic ACh (nACh) receptor constructs were designed with successively shorter linker lengths and expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Resulting receptor stoichiometries were investigated by functional analysis in two-electrode voltage-clamp experiments. Molecular dynamics simulations were performed to investigate potential effects of linkers on the 3D structure of concatemers. KEY RESULTS: Dimeric constructs were found to be unreliable and should be avoided for expression of ternary receptors. By introducing two short linkers, we obtained efficient expression of uniform receptor pools with tetrameric and pentameric constructs. However, linkers should not be excessively short as that introduces strain on the 3D structure of concatemers. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The data demonstrate that design of concatenated Cys-loop receptors requires a compromise between the desire for control of assembly and avoiding introduction of strain on the resulting protein. The overall best strategy was found to be pentameric constructs with carefully optimised linker lengths. Our findings will advance studies of ternary or more complex Cys-loop receptors as well as enabling detailed analysis of how pharmacological agents interact with stoichiometry-specific binding sites.
Authors: Michael J Curtis; Steve Alexander; Giuseppe Cirino; James R Docherty; Christopher H George; Mark A Giembycz; Daniel Hoyer; Paul A Insel; Angelo A Izzo; Yong Ji; David J MacEwan; Christopher G Sobey; S Clare Stanford; Mauro M Teixeira; Sue Wonnacott; Amrita Ahluwalia Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Dinesh C Indurthi; Trevor M Lewis; Philip K Ahring; Thomas Balle; Mary Chebib; Nathan L Absalom Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Simon D Harding; Joanna L Sharman; Elena Faccenda; Chris Southan; Adam J Pawson; Sam Ireland; Alasdair J G Gray; Liam Bruce; Stephen P H Alexander; Stephen Anderton; Clare Bryant; Anthony P Davenport; Christian Doerig; Doriano Fabbro; Francesca Levi-Schaffer; Michael Spedding; Jamie A Davies Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Peter Eastman; Jason Swails; John D Chodera; Robert T McGibbon; Yutong Zhao; Kyle A Beauchamp; Lee-Ping Wang; Andrew C Simmonett; Matthew P Harrigan; Chaya D Stern; Rafal P Wiewiora; Bernard R Brooks; Vijay S Pande Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 4.475