Judy E Stern1, Chia-Ling Liu2, Xiaohui Cui2, Howard J Cabral3, Leslie V Farland4, Charles Coddington5, Hafsatou Diop2. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pathology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire. Electronic address: judy.e.stern@dartmouth.edu. 2. Bureau of Family Health and Nutrition, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carolinas Medical Center/Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment adds obstetric and neonatal risks over and above that of underlying infertility-related diagnoses. DESIGN: Retrospective study of linked ART, birth certificate, hospital discharge data, and outpatient insurance claims data in Massachusetts (2013-2017). SETTING: Database. PATIENT(S): Singleton deliveries in women with and without diagnoses of tubal disease, polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), other ovulatory conditions, or endometriosis, identified from the insurance claims and ART data. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): ART and non-ART pregnancy and delivery outcomes were compared with each other and with women with no history of infertility or usage of fertility treatment (fertile group). Generalizing estimating equations with Poisson distribution and exchangeable correlation structure were used to obtain adjusted relative risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULT(S): Infertility-related diagnoses significantly increased the risks of pregnancy hypertension (PCOS: aRR, 1.13, 95% CI 1.00-1.27), preeclampsia/eclampsia (tubal: aRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.02-1.61; PCOS: aRR 1.23, 95% CI 1.06-1.43; other ovulatory: aRR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.20), gestational diabetes (tubal: aRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08-1.50; PCOS: aRR 1.58, 95% CI 1.42-1.75; other ovulatory: aRR 1.19, 95% CI 1.12-1.26), and placental problems (tubal aRR 1.47, 95% CI 1.11-1.94), as well as low birthweight and prematurity, compared with deliveries from the fertile group. Within each diagnosis, the use of ART consistently increased the risk of placental problems (aRR 1.49-2.86) but varied for other conditions. CONCLUSION(S): Our study demonstrated that compared with the fertile group, risk was elevated in pregnancies and deliveries from women with tubal, PCOS, other ovulatory, and endometriosis diagnoses who did/did not undergo ART treatment. Placental abnormalities were particularly elevated in ART compared to non-ART deliveries having the same diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment adds obstetric and neonatal risks over and above that of underlying infertility-related diagnoses. DESIGN: Retrospective study of linked ART, birth certificate, hospital discharge data, and outpatient insurance claims data in Massachusetts (2013-2017). SETTING: Database. PATIENT(S): Singleton deliveries in women with and without diagnoses of tubal disease, polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), other ovulatory conditions, or endometriosis, identified from the insurance claims and ART data. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): ART and non-ART pregnancy and delivery outcomes were compared with each other and with women with no history of infertility or usage of fertility treatment (fertile group). Generalizing estimating equations with Poisson distribution and exchangeable correlation structure were used to obtain adjusted relative risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULT(S): Infertility-related diagnoses significantly increased the risks of pregnancy hypertension (PCOS: aRR, 1.13, 95% CI 1.00-1.27), preeclampsia/eclampsia (tubal: aRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.02-1.61; PCOS: aRR 1.23, 95% CI 1.06-1.43; other ovulatory: aRR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.20), gestational diabetes (tubal: aRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08-1.50; PCOS: aRR 1.58, 95% CI 1.42-1.75; other ovulatory: aRR 1.19, 95% CI 1.12-1.26), and placental problems (tubal aRR 1.47, 95% CI 1.11-1.94), as well as low birthweight and prematurity, compared with deliveries from the fertile group. Within each diagnosis, the use of ART consistently increased the risk of placental problems (aRR 1.49-2.86) but varied for other conditions. CONCLUSION(S): Our study demonstrated that compared with the fertile group, risk was elevated in pregnancies and deliveries from women with tubal, PCOS, other ovulatory, and endometriosis diagnoses who did/did not undergo ART treatment. Placental abnormalities were particularly elevated in ART compared to non-ART deliveries having the same diagnosis.
Authors: Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; David B Seifer; Amy T Sparks; Paul C Lin; Kevin J Doody; Bradley J Van Voorhis; Logan G Spector Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2018-10-17 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Konstantinos A Toulis; Dimitrios G Goulis; Efstratios M Kolibianakis; Christos A Venetis; Basil C Tarlatzis; Ioannis Papadimas Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2008-08-16 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Leslie V Farland; Jennifer Prescott; Naoko Sasamoto; Deirdre K Tobias; Audrey J Gaskins; Jennifer J Stuart; Daniela A Carusi; Jorge E Chavarro; Andrew W Horne; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Stacey A Missmer Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 7.623