| Literature DB >> 32617802 |
Jiahui Ma1, Shanshan Wei1, Xiaodan Jiang1, Yilin Chou1, Yuexin Wang1, Ran Hao1, Jiarui Yang1, Xuemin Li2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore objective visual quality in dry eye diseases (DED) and the correlation between corneal nerves and objective visual quality.Entities:
Keywords: Dry eye diseases; In vivo confocal microscope; OQAS II; Objective visual quality
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32617802 PMCID: PMC7550365 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-020-01483-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Ophthalmol ISSN: 0165-5701 Impact factor: 2.031
Fig. 1Example of tear film analysis in the OQAS II. The OSI was recorded every 0.5 seconds within a 20-second period
Basic characteristics of patients and examination results
| Mean ± SD (range) | |
|---|---|
| Gender | 14 males/25 females |
| Age (years) | 56 ± 17 (25–86) |
| OSDI | 36.6 ± 17.3 (2.5–68.18) |
| OQAS | |
| OSI | 1.40 ± 1.70 (0.2–11.00) |
| mOSI | 2.00 ± 1.85 (0.42–11.28) |
| MTF cutoff value | 32.3 ± 11.3 (3.5–55.1) |
| Strehl ratio | 0.16 ± 0.05 (0.05–0.30) |
| TMH, mm | 0.21 ± 0.06 (0.10–0.37) |
| TBUTf, s | 5.9 ± 3.3 (1.7–20.8) |
| Eyelid margin, | |
| Rounding of posterior margin | 33 (33.7) |
| Irregularity | 31 (31.6) |
| Telangiectasia | 37 (37.8) |
| Blepharitis | 13 (13.3) |
| Trichiasis | 6 (6.1) |
| Lashloss | 2 (2.0) |
| Meibomian gland assessments | |
| Meibum quality | 1.73 |
| Meibomian glands plugging | 8 (8.2) |
| Degree of meibomian gland deficiency | 2.86 |
| Corneal staining | 1.07 |
| Confocal | |
| Corneal nerve length (pixels) | 3862.3 ± 761.9 (2097.8–5807.1) |
| Corneal nerve width (pixels) | 5.1 ± 0.8 (3.1–7.4) |
| Corneal nerve reflectivity (gray values) | 137.3 ± 17.4 (95.0–170.6) |
| Corneal nerve tortuosity (degrees) | 128.9 ± 6.9 (111.3–141.6) |
OSDI ocular surface disease index, TBUTf first tear breakup time, TMH tear meniscus time, OQAS optical quality analysis system, OSI objective scattering index, mOSI mean objective scattering index, MTF cutoff value modulation transfer function cutoff
Results of correlations between eyelid margin signs and OQAS parameters
| Variable | OSDI | Rounding | Notching | Vascularity | Trichiasis | Plugging | Lass loss | Blepharitis | Meibum quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mOSI | |||||||||
| | 0.422 | 0.223 | 0.077 | 0.203 | 0.041 | 0.306 | 0.222 | 0.240 | 0.214 |
| | 0.005 | 0.037 | 0.477 | 0.057 | 0.706 | 0.004 | 0.038 | 0.025 | 0.048 |
| OSI | |||||||||
| | 0.297 | 0.293 | 0.147 | 0.279 | 0.041 | 0.306 | 0.228 | 0.255 | 0.330 |
| | 0.053 | 0.005 | 0.170 | 0.008 | 0.702 | 0.004 | 0.032 | 0.016 | 0.02* |
| MTF cutoff value | |||||||||
| | − 0.355 | − 0.324 | − 0.069 | − 0.206 | − 0.084 | − 0.225* | − 0.200 | − 0.186 | − 0.298 |
| | 0.020 | 0.002 | 0.518 | 0.051 | 0.431 | 0.033* | 0.058 | 0.080 | 0.005 |
| Strehl ratio | |||||||||
| | − 0.446 | − 0.294 | − 0.132 | − 0.278 | − 0.092 | − 0.264 | − 0.221 | − 0.239 | − 0.195 |
| | 0.003 | 0.005 | 0.216 | 0.008** | 0.390 | 0.012* | 0.037* | 0.023* | 0.069 |
**Significant correlation (p < 0.01)
*Significant correlation (p < 0.05)
Results of correlations between tear film clinical tests and OQAS parameters
| TMH | TBUTf | Cornea Staining | |
|---|---|---|---|
| mOSI | |||
| | − 0.056 | − 0.036 | 0.029 |
| | 0.601 | 0.740 | 0.855 |
| OSI | |||
| | − 0.010 | − 0.251 | 0.028 |
| | 0.926 | 0.016 | 0.860 |
| MTF cutoff value | |||
| | − 0.014 | 0.213 | − 0.029 |
| | 0.892 | 0.042 | 0.855 |
| Strehl ratio | |||
| | − 0.017 | 0.120 | − 0.086 |
| | 0.875 | 0.256 | 0.581 |
**Significant correlation (p < 0.01)
*Significant correlation (p < 0.05)
Results of correlation between in vivo confocal microscopy and OQAS parameters
| Corneal length (pixels) | Corneal width (pixels) | Corneal Reflectivity (gray values) | Corneal tortuosity (degrees) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mOSI | ||||
| | − 0.239 | − 0.180 | 0.139 | − 0.056 |
| | 0.037 | 0.127 | 0.228 | 0.627 |
| OSI | ||||
| | − 0.294 | − 0.180 | − 0.282 | − 0.56 |
| | 0.009 | 0.127 | 0.015 | 0.629 |
| MTF cutoff value | ||||
| | 0.282 | 0.259 | − 0.094 | 0.007 |
| | 0.012 | 0.025 | 0.411 | 0.951 |
| Strehl ratio | ||||
| | 0.299 | 0.262 | − 0.095 | 0.058 |
| | 0.008* | 0.023 | 0.404 | 0.612 |
*Significant correlation (p < 0.05)
**Significant correlation (p < 0.01)
Fig. 2Examples of confocal image of corneal nerve with different OQAS parameters. Longer and wider corneal nerves were associated with better objective visual quality. c/deg, cycles per degree