| Literature DB >> 32616962 |
Marzena Joanna Kuras1, Monika Zielińska-Pisklak1, Justyna Duszyńska1, Joanna Jabłońska1.
Abstract
Due to the growing interest in running a healthy life, including the diet a special interest has been put in searching for products that are rich in nutrients, macro and micronutrients and vitamins. Dates are the fruits that meet these requirements and show multidirectional pro-health effects. These fruits are a source of potassium and other macro- and micronutrients. They have antioxidant properties thanks to the content of flavonoids and polyphenols. The elemental composition (Al, Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, P, Sr and Zn) and antioxidant properties (total equivalent antioxidant capacity, total polyphenol content, total flavonoid content) of various dates from different regions of the world was determined. The results have shown that the peel and flesh of dates differ significantly in chemical composition. The peel is significantly richer in chemical components of biological importance. Discriminant analysis of the results obtained for dates originated from various regions indicated that the main factor determining the tested chemical composition is the place of cultivation, not the variety.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant properties; Dates; Discriminant analysis; Elemental composition; Phoenix dactylifera L.
Year: 2020 PMID: 32616962 PMCID: PMC7316905 DOI: 10.1007/s13197-020-04314-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Food Sci Technol ISSN: 0022-1155 Impact factor: 2.701
Fig. 1Comparison of the elemental composition, TEAC, TPC and TFC in the skin and flesh of Sukkary date from Saudi Arabia
Comparison of the elemental composition of flesh of the dates from Saudi Arabia
| Saada Sukary | Agil Sukary | Quassim Sukary | Kholas | Reshodiah | Nabatat Ali | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | 41 ± 6 | 25 ± 6 | 28 ± 0.5 | 28 ± 8 | 24 ± 0.6 | 38 ± 7 |
| Ca | 438 ± 2 | 118 ± 50 | 529 ± 51 | 392 ± 39 | 257 ± 12 | 451 ± 24 |
| Cu | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.02 | 1.5 ± 0.07 | 2.9 ± 0.04 | 5.6 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.2 |
| Fe | 5.60 ± 0.9 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 2.1 ± 0.5 | 4.0 ± 0.2 | ND | 5.5 ± 0.2 |
| K | 7950 ± 25 | 7843 ± 199 | 6914 ± 47 | 7015 ± 8 | 7390 ± 2 | 6060 ± 80 |
| Mg | 697 ± 19 | 659 ± 7 | 801 ± 5 | 788 ± 6 | 502 ± 2 | 504 ± 84 |
| Mn | 4.8 ± 0.6 | 7.1 ± 0.1 | 4.0 ± 0.04 | 5.8 ± 0.01 | 9.7 ± 0.1 | 3.37 ± 1.3 |
| P | 606 ± 42 | 794 ± 149 | 822 ± 79 | 567 ± 13 | 1041 ± 90 | 468 ± 28 |
| Sr | 3.2 ± 1.2 | 6.0 ± 0.3 | 8.3 ± 0.8 | 11.9 ± 1.4 | 4.7 ± 0.4 | 1.0 ± 0.3 |
| Zn | 5.5 ± 0.02 | 4.5 ± 0.2 | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 5.8 ± 0.4 | 2.8 ± 0.6 |
| TEAC | 24 ± 2 | 38 ± 3 | 25 ± 1 | 21 ± 2 | 21 ± 2 | 17 ± 1 |
| TFC | 504 ± 8 | 521 ± 7 | 307 ± 4 | 384 ± 8 | 481 ± 19 | 542 ± 8 |
| TPC | 920 ± 15 | 1117 ± 9 | 812 ± 21 | 1253 ± 9 | 1498 ± 9 | 1056 ± 16 |
The concentration values expressed as mg/kg
TEAC mg trolox/100 g; values are expressed as mean ± standard error (n = 3)
Comparison of the elemental composition of flesh of the Iranian and Israeli dates available on the Polish market
| Iran—Złota Palma | Iran—Bakalland | Iran—Kimia | Izrael—Medjool Supreme | Izrael—Medjool | Izrael—Medjool Blue | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | 34 ± 1 | 29 ± 3 | 27 ± 2 | 25 ± 1 | 26 ± 1 | 23 ± 0.2 |
| Ca | 155 ± 8 | 603 ± 21 | 533 ± 19 | 207 ± 14 | 338 ± 173 | 626 ± 172 |
| Cu | 4.3 ± 0 .021 | 3.3 ± 0.025 | 6.3 ± 0.065 | 2.6 ± 0.027 | 1.7 ± 0.038 | 7.0 ± 0.093 |
| Fe | 2.9 ± 1.3 | 6.7 ± 1.6 | 8.7 ± 2.9 | ND | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.1 |
| K | 8521 ± 105 | 7431 ± 10 | 8280 ± 426 | 7435 ± 140 | 9303 ± 64.0 | 7276 ± 343 |
| Mg | 479 ± 3 | 456 ± 2 | 610 ± 70 | 717 ± 10 | 760 ± 55 | 892 ± 116 |
| Mn | 9.0 ± 0.09 | 5.3 ± 0.03 | 12 ± 0.11 | 4.5 ± 0.06 | 3.7 ± 0.09 | 5.1 ± 0.01 |
| P | 431 ± 32 | 474 ± 81 | 795 ± 58 | 595 ± 44 | 678 ± 59 | 581 ± 113 |
| Sr | 4.4 ± 1.1 | 7.4 ± 3.5 | 12 ± 1.8 | 8.3 ± 0.7 | 8.3 ± 2.0 | 11 ± 3.1 |
| Zn | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 4.4 ± 2.4 | 11 ± 1.0 | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 3.0 ± 1.2 | 3.8 ± 1.3 |
| TEAC | 36 ± 3 | 44 ± 4 | 73 ± 6 | 33 ± 3 | 56 ± 5 | 54 ± 4 |
| TFC | 317 ± 11 | 404 ± 8 | 678 ± 6 | 313 ± 9 | 452 ± 5 | 426 ± 5 |
| TPC | 861 ± 12 | 942 ± 18 | 1565 ± 24 | 978 ± 21 | 1300 ± 11 | 905 ± 10 |
The concentration values expressed as mg/kg
TEAC mg trolox/100 g; values are expressed as mean ± standard error (n = 3)
Comparison of the elemental composition of flesh of the Tunisian and Egyptian dates available on the Polish market
| Tunezja—SDoukoss1 | Tunezja—SDoukoss2 | Tunezja—Bioplanet | Egypt | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | 24 ± 2 | 25 ± 0.2 | 27 ± 2 | 31 ± 3 |
| Ca | 239 ± 24 | 269 ± 30 | 334 ± 33 | 399 ± 41 |
| Cu | 2.9 ± 0.03 | 1.2 ± 0.02 | 2.9 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.1 |
| Fe | 3.5 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.4 | ND | 5.4 ± 2.6 |
| K | 9110 ± 492 | 10,550 ± 1121 | 7633 ± 690 | 7752 ± 125 |
| Mg | 605 ± 41 | 786 ± 147 | 447 ± 53 | 683 ± 56 |
| Mn | 4.3 ± 0.07 | 3.7 ± 0.02 | 4.8 ± 0.02 | 4.4 ± 0.006 |
| P | 674 ± 72 | 616 ± 120 | 604 ± 112 | 651 ± 87 |
| Sr | 4.8 ± 2.3 | 4.3 ± 0.7 | 3.3 ± 0.5 | 12 ± 0.2 |
| Zn | 2.4 ± 0.6 | 3.6 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 3.3 ± 0.2 |
| TEAC | 75 ± 6 | 74 ± 6 | 72 ± 6 | 91 ± 7 |
| TFC | 1005 ± 10 | 839 ± 6 | 623 ± 8 | 751 ± 7 |
| TPC | 1253 ± 11 | 1342 ± 23 | 842 ± 18 | 1411 ± 16 |
The concentration values expressed as mg/kg
TEAC mg trolox/100 g; values are expressed as mean ± standard error (n = 3)
Fig. 2Scatter diagram of dates samples harvested in different countries