Literature DB >> 32613498

Intraoperative complications and troubles in robot-assisted anatomical pulmonary resection.

Hiroyasu Ueno1, Yukio Watanabe1, Shunki Hirayama2, Aritoshi Hattori1, Kota Imashimizu1, Kazuya Takamochi1, Shiaki Oh1, Kenji Suzuki3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Regarding intraoperative complications and troubles during robot-assisted thoracic surgery, few data are available especially in Japan. This study was aimed to elucidate intraoperative complications and troubles in robotic anatomical lung resection, and to present managements and outcomes of those.
METHODS: This was a retrospective singe-institutional study. The first 192 consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted anatomical lung resection between January 2017 and August 2019 were evaluated. We examined the frequency, management and outcomes of intraoperative complications and troubles.
RESULTS: Of the 192 eligible patients who underwent robotic anatomical lung resection, lobectomy was performed for 156 (81.2%), and segmentectomy for 36 (18.8%). Three (1.5%) required conversion to open thoracotomy. Of these, bleeding from the pulmonary artery was the cause in two patients (1.0%) and inflammatory adhesion of hilar lymph nodes in 1 (0.5%). Other intraoperative complications and troubles included bronchial injuries in 3 patients (1.5%), lung injury by assistant in one patient (0.5%) and horizontal movement limitation of da Vinci arm in one patient (0.5%). Regarding bronchial injuries, two of three were stump injuries related to stapling, the remaining was to dissection of the bronchial tissues. All bronchial repairs were completed without conversion, and postoperative complications related to bronchial injury were not observed. The 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were both 0%.
CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of intraoperative complications and troubles in robot-assisted thoracic surgery was low in our first series. All conversions were related to bleeding and impending bleeding, and no conversion was required for bronchial injury.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomical lung resection; Intraoperative complication; Robot-assisted thoracic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32613498     DOI: 10.1007/s11748-020-01419-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1863-6705


  2 in total

1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on pulmonary resections by robotic video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Christopher Cao; Con Manganas; Su C Ang; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

2.  Postoperative pain after lobectomy: robot-assisted, video-assisted and open thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Augustinus P T van der Ploeg; Ninos Ayez; George P Akkersdijk; Charles C van Rossem; Peter D de Rooij
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-03-29
  2 in total
  3 in total

1.  Robot-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer patients with incomplete fissure.

Authors:  Xu Hao; Wang Jun; Chang Xiaoyan; Zhang Linyou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robot-assisted vs. video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in lung cancer.

Authors:  Masahiro Miyajima; Ryunosuke Maki; Wataru Arai; Kodai Tsuruta; Yuma Shindo; Yasuyuki Nakamura; Atsushi Watanabe
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.005

3.  Causes and management of intraoperative complications in robot-assisted anatomical pulmonary resection for lung cancer.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Takase; Masahiro Miyajima; Yoshiki Chiba; Daichi Ishii; Taiki Sato; Yuma Shindo; Yasuyuki Nakamura; Miho Aoyagi; Kodai Tsuruta; Atsushi Watanabe
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 3.005

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.