Literature DB >> 35552813

Robot-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer patients with incomplete fissure.

Xu Hao1, Wang Jun1, Chang Xiaoyan1, Zhang Linyou2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted thoracic surgery has gradually been accepted as an alternative treatment for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) owing to its advantages. However, severe incomplete interlobar fissure may lead to a high rate of conversion and postoperative morbidity. This retrospective study was conducted to assess the safety and efficiency of robot-assisted lung resection for patients with incomplete fissures (IFs).
METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records was performed in our institution from March 2021 to November 2021, and 207 patients with NSCLC who underwent robot-assisted anatomic lung resection were included in this study. Patients were divided into the IF group and the complete fissure (CF) group according to the level of fissure, which was determined based on the anatomical classification of pulmonary fissures.
RESULTS: The number of patients in the IF and CF groups was 87 and 120, respectively. In univariate analysis, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative time (p = 0.66), intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.26), chest tube duration (p = 0.41), incidence of prolonged air leakage (PAL, p = 0.49), or length of postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.25). No patients experienced bronchopleural fistula, pneumonia, or cardiovascular complications. The total cost in the IF group was higher than that in the CF group (¥83,655 ± 13,314 versus ¥78,211 ± 11,980, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: IF does not increase the difficulty of lung cancer surgery with robotic platforms. Robot-assisted anatomic lung resection using the tunnel technique is an effective and safe method for IF patients.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Incomplete fissure; Lung cancer; Robot-assisted thoracic surgery

Year:  2022        PMID: 35552813     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09283-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  28 in total

1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on pulmonary resections by robotic video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Christopher Cao; Con Manganas; Su C Ang; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

2.  Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Morten Bendixen; Ole Dan Jørgensen; Christian Kronborg; Claus Andersen; Peter Bjørn Licht
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  The efficacy of thoracoscopic fissureless lobectomy in patients with dense fissures.

Authors:  Hitoshi Igai; Mitsuhiro Kamiyoshihara; Ryohei Yoshikawa; Fumi Osawa; Natsuko Kawatani; Takashi Ibe; Kimihiro Shimizu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Surgical Management of Lung Cancer: History, Evolution, and Modern Advances.

Authors:  Abbas E Abbas
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Intraoperative complications and troubles in robot-assisted anatomical pulmonary resection.

Authors:  Hiroyasu Ueno; Yukio Watanabe; Shunki Hirayama; Aritoshi Hattori; Kota Imashimizu; Kazuya Takamochi; Shiaki Oh; Kenji Suzuki
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-07-01

6.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.

Authors:  Hyuna Sung; Jacques Ferlay; Rebecca L Siegel; Mathieu Laversanne; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Comment on "Subclassification of Microscopic Vascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma".

Authors:  Gang Xu; Yao Xiao; Bao Jin; Yi-Lei Mao; Shun-Da Du
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Pulmonary Open, Robotic and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy (PORTaL) Study: An Analysis of 5,721 Cases.

Authors:  Michael S Kent; Matthew G Hartwig; Eric Vallières; Abbas E Abbas; Robert J Cerfolio; Mark R Dylewski; Thomas Fabian; Luis J Herrera; Kimble G Jett; Richard S Lazzaro; Bryan Meyers; Brian A Mitzman; Rishindra M Reddy; Michael F Reed; David C Rice; Patrick Ross; Inderpal S Sarkaria; Lana Y Schumacher; William B Tisol; Dennis A Wigle; Michael Zervos
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 13.787

9.  VATS lobectomy has better perioperative outcomes than open lobectomy: CALGB 31001, an ancillary analysis of CALGB 140202 (Alliance).

Authors:  Chukwumere E Nwogu; Jonathan D'Cunha; Herbert Pang; Lin Gu; Xiaofei Wang; William G Richards; Linda J Veit; Todd L Demmy; David J Sugarbaker; Leslie J Kohman; Scott J Swanson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 10.  Use of Robotics in Surgical Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Lawek Berzenji; Krishan Yogeswaran; Paul Van Schil; Patrick Lauwers; Jeroen M H Hendriks
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.