Literature DB >> 30927155

Postoperative pain after lobectomy: robot-assisted, video-assisted and open thoracic surgery.

Augustinus P T van der Ploeg1, Ninos Ayez2, George P Akkersdijk3, Charles C van Rossem3, Peter D de Rooij3.   

Abstract

Surgical resection is the optimal procedure for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Open thoracotomy, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) are different surgical modalities with possible different outcomes. The aim of this study was to analyze differences in outcome with a focus on postoperative pain. Patients undergoing lobectomy at the Maasstad Hospital in 2015 and 2016 were included. Postoperative pain was scored according to the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Additionally, duration of chest tube drainage and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), hospital length of stay and type of surgery were assessed. Lobectomy was performed in 57 patients. There was no significant difference in type of surgery, age, gender, right-sided surgery, postoperative NRS scores, duration of chest tube drainage and epidural anesthesia, and hospital length of stay (p > 0.05). Operative time for RATS was significantly longer (p = 0.002). Postoperative pain scores and other outcomes did not differ between the three different modalities in surgery for NSCLC. In the future, more minimally invasive surgery will be used in pulmonary surgery with thoracotomy as a safe alternative in selected cases. Future studies have to demonstrate if RATS will overcome the differences concerning cost-effectiveness over VATS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lung; Pain; Robotic; Surgery; VATS

Year:  2019        PMID: 30927155     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-00953-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  28 in total

1.  Cost comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary lobectomy.

Authors:  Bernard J Park; Raja M Flores
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.750

2.  Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Morten Bendixen; Ole Dan Jørgensen; Christian Kronborg; Claus Andersen; Peter Bjørn Licht
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 3.  The Use of Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Lung Resection: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.

Authors:  John Agzarian; Christine Fahim; Yaron Shargall; Kazuhiro Yasufuku; Thomas K Waddell; Waël C Hanna
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-02-09

Review 4.  Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales.

Authors:  Amelia Williamson; Barbara Hoggart
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.036

5.  Comparison between two thoracotomy closure techniques: postoperative pain and pulmonary function.

Authors:  Juliana Duarte Leandro; Olavo Ribeiro Rodrigues; Annie France Frere Slaets; Aurelino F Schmidt; Milton L Yaekashi
Journal:  J Bras Pneumol       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.624

6.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy reduces the morbidity after surgery for stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Masashi Muraoka; Tadayuki Oka; Shinji Akamine; Tsutomu Tagawa; Akihiro Nakamura; Satoshi Hashizume; Keitaro Matsumoto; Masato Araki; Yutaka Tagawa; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-02

7.  Thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy. Early operative experience and preliminary clinical results.

Authors:  W S Walker; F M Carnochan; G C Pugh
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Use and Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Lobectomy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang; Zhifei Sun; Paul J Speicher; Shakir M Saud; Brian C Gulack; Matthew G Hartwig; David H Harpole; Mark W Onaitis; Betty C Tong; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark F Berry
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 9.  Feasibility and safety of robot-assisted thoracic surgery for lung lobectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shiyou Wei; Minghao Chen; Nan Chen; Lunxu Liu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 10.  Robotic versus thoracoscopic lung resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Emmert; Carmen Straube; Judith Buentzel; Christian Roever
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  15 in total

1.  Intraoperative complications and troubles in robot-assisted anatomical pulmonary resection.

Authors:  Hiroyasu Ueno; Yukio Watanabe; Shunki Hirayama; Aritoshi Hattori; Kota Imashimizu; Kazuya Takamochi; Shiaki Oh; Kenji Suzuki
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-07-01

Review 2.  Robotic and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after learning curve: 30-day and 12-month outcomes.

Authors:  Renato Roriz-Silva; Ramon Vilallonga; Jose Manuel Fort; Jad Khoraki; Amador Garcia Ruiz de Gordejuela; Oscar Gonzalez; Enric Caubet; María Rita Rodríguez-Luna; Manel Armengol
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-02-26

3.  Discrepancy in the perception of symptoms among patients and healthcare providers after lung cancer surgery.

Authors:  Xing Wei; Hongfan Yu; Wei Dai; Wei Xu; Qingsong Yu; Yang Pu; Yaqin Wang; Jia Liao; Qiang Li; Qiuling Shi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Comparison of the perioperative outcomes between robotic-assisted thoracic surgery and video-assisted thoracic surgery in non-small cell lung cancer patients with different body mass index ranges.

Authors:  Chenghao Qu; Rongyang Li; Zheng Ma; Jingyi Han; Weiming Yue; Clemens Aigner; Monica Casiraghi; Hui Tian
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2022-06

5.  Analysis of perioperative complications and related risk factors of thoracotomy and complete video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy.

Authors:  Hongwei Su; Guorong Yan; Zijian Li; Lin Fu; Lingdi Li
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.940

6.  Increased Pain Sensitivity in Obese Patients After Lung Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Maciej Majchrzak; Anna Brzecka; Cyryl Daroszewski; Piotr Błasiak; Adam Rzechonek; Vadim V Tarasov; Vladimir N Chubarev; Anastasiya S Kurinnaya; Tatiana I Melnikova; Alfiya Makhmutova; Sergey G Klochkov; Siva G Somasundaram; Cecil E Kirkland; Gjumrakch Aliev
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  The Efficacy and Safety of Paravertebral Block Combined with Parecoxib During Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Junling Yang; Zaijun Hao; Wei Li; Caiping Duan; Xiujuan Fan; Jing Xin; Chunguang Ren
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.133

8.  Perioperative exercise intervention in patients with lung cancer: A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Chun-Hou Huang; Tai-Chu Peng; Yi-Tso Cheng; Yen-Ta Huang; Bee-Song Chang
Journal:  Tzu Chi Med J       Date:  2021-04-26

9.  Recent advances in non-intubated robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (NiRATS) for tracheal/airway resection and reconstruction.

Authors:  Volkan Kösek; Eyad Al Masri; Bassam Redwan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-10

10.  [Robot-assisted Lobectomy under Port-only Mode with Artificial Pneumothorax].

Authors:  Lianmin Zhang; Xiaoliang Zhao; Feng Xu; Yu Zhang; Qiang Zhang; Jian You
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2020-01-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.