| Literature DB >> 32612212 |
Norihiro Oshime1, Jun Kano2,3,4, Eiji Ikenaga5, Shintaro Yasui6,7, Yosuke Hamasaki6, Sou Yasuhara6, Satoshi Hinokuma8, Naoshi Ikeda9, Pierre-Eymeric Janolin10, Jean-Michel Kiat10, Mitsuru Itoh6, Takayoshi Yokoya11, Tatsuo Fujii9, Akira Yasui5, Hitoshi Osawa5.
Abstract
Skewed band structures have been empirically described in ferroelectric materials to explain the functioning of recently developed ferroelectric tunneling junction (FTJs). Nonvolatile ferroelectric random access memory (FeRAM) and the artificial neural network device based on the FTJ system are rapidly developing. However, because the actual ferroelectric band structure has not been elucidated, precise designing of devices has to be advanced through appropriate heuristics. Here, we perform angle-resolved hard X-ray photoemission spectroscopy of ferroelectric BaTiO3 thin films for the direct observation of ferroelectric band skewing structure as the depth profiles of atomic orbitals. The depth-resolved electronic band structure consists of three depth regions: a potential slope along the electric polarization in the core, the surface and interface exhibiting slight changes. We also demonstrate that the direction of the energy shift is controlled by the polarization reversal. In the ferroelectric skewed band structure, we found that the difference in energy shifts of the atomic orbitals is correlated with the atomic configuration of the soft phonon mode reflecting the Born effective charges. These findings lead to a better understanding of the origin of electric polarization.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32612212 PMCID: PMC7329818 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-67651-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1AR-HAXPES spectra observed at each emission angle: (a) Ti-2p3/2 and (b) valence band in the 5 nm thick BTO. Red and purple circles are surface and deeper regions, respectively. In the spectrum at emission angle = 65°, curves of background and Voigt function are drawn as gray lines.
Figure 2Depth dependence of binding energies of BTO: (a) Ti-2p3/2, O-1 s, Ba-3d5/2 in 5 nm thickness, (b) valence band in 5 nm, (c) Ti-2p3/2 in 15 nm, and (d) Ti-2p3/2 in 50 nm. Plots indicate the peak energy estimated by the center position of FWHM at each emission angle. Solid and dashed red lines are obtained by a linear function fit. Green arrows show the energy shift in FEBS. Red arrows indicate the inherent direction of electric polarization. Blue arrow seen in (d) indicates the direction of electric polarization by switching induced by the applied electric field. The inset graph in (d) is the P–E loop of the 50 nm sample.
Measured binding energy shift of FEBS by AR-HAXPES and remanent polarization Pr by P–E loop and calculated effective screening length λeff and depolarizing field .
| FEBS (eV) | λeff (Å) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 nm BTO/NSTO | 0.17 | 12* | 0.13 | − 6.80 × 105 |
| 15 nm BTO/NSTO | 0.11 | 26* | 0.04 | − 1.47 × 105 |
| Pt/50 nm BTO/SRO/LSAT | 0.24 | 43 | 0.05 | − 0.96 × 105 |
| Pt/50 nm BTO/SRO/LSAT | 0.15 | − 11 | 0.12 | 0.60 × 105 |
Since P–E loop of 5 and 15 nm samples could not be observed owing to the leakage current, the values of Pr in 5 and 15 nm thickness were used in the experimental values of Ref.[21]. For 50 nm sample, two types of FEBS are listed. The values of FEBS are different between the up and down direction due to the imprint.
*Ref.[21].