Literature DB >> 3170944

Glottal airflow and transglottal air pressure measurements for male and female speakers in soft, normal, and loud voice.

E B Holmberg1, R E Hillman, J S Perkell.   

Abstract

Measurements on the inverse filtered airflow waveform (the "glottal waveform") and of estimated average transglottal pressure and glottal airflow were made from noninvasive recordings of productions of syllable sequences in soft, normal, and loud voice for 25 male and 20 female speakers. Statistical analyses showed that with change from normal to loud voice, both males and females produced loud voice with increased pressure, accompanied by increased ac flow and increased maximum airflow declination rate. With change from normal voice, soft voice was produced with decreased pressure, ac flow and maximum airflow declination rate, and increased dc and average flow. Within the loudness conditions, there was no significant male-female difference in air pressure. Several glottal waveform parameters separated males and females in normal and loud voice. The data indicate higher ac flow and higher maximum airflow declination rate for males. In soft voice, the male and female glottal waveforms were more alike, and there was no significant difference in maximum airflow declination rate. The dc flow did not differ significantly between males and females. Possible relevance to biomechanical differences and differences in voice source characteristics between males and females and across loudness conditions is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3170944     DOI: 10.1121/1.396829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  89 in total

1.  Investigating acoustic correlates of human vocal fold vibratory phase asymmetry through modeling and laryngeal high-speed videoendoscopy.

Authors:  Daryush D Mehta; Matías Zaéartu; Thomas F Quatieri; Dimitar D Deliyski; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The impact of rate reduction and increased loudness on fundamental frequency characteristics in dysarthria.

Authors:  Kris Tjaden; Greg Wilding
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 0.849

3.  Subglottal pressure, tracheal airflow, and intrinsic laryngeal muscle activity during rat ultrasound vocalization.

Authors:  Tobias Riede
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Comparison of glottal flow rate characteristics based on experimental and computational data.

Authors:  Liran Oren; Sid Khosla; Ephraim Gutmark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Vocal power and pressure-flow relationships in excised tiger larynges.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; W Tecumseh Fitch; Eric J Hunter; Fariborz Alipour; Douglas Montequin; Douglas L Armstrong; Joann McGee; Edward J Walsh
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Direct measurement of planar flow rate in an excised canine larynx model.

Authors:  Liran Oren; Sid Khosla; Doug Dembinski; Jun Ying; Ephraim Gutmark
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Increased vocal intensity due to the Lombard effect in speakers with Parkinson's disease: simultaneous laryngeal and respiratory strategies.

Authors:  Elaine T Stathopoulos; Jessica E Huber; Kelly Richardson; Jennifer Kamphaus; Devan DeCicco; Meghan Darling; Katrina Fulcher; Joan E Sussman
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 2.288

8.  The Effects of Hyper- and Hypocapnia on Phonatory Laryngeal Airway Resistance in Women.

Authors:  Amanda I Gillespie; William Slivka; Charles W Atwood; Katherine Verdolini Abbott
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Investigation of phonatory characteristics using ex vivo rabbit larynges.

Authors:  Michael Döllinger; Stefan Kniesburges; David A Berry; Veronika Birk; Olaf Wendler; Stephan Dürr; Christoph Alexiou; Anne Schützenberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Measures to Evaluate the Effects of DBS on Speech Production.

Authors:  Gary Weismer; Yana Yunusova; Kate Bunton
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.