Literature DB >> 3260854

Emergence of resistance during beta-lactam therapy of gram-negative infections. Bacterial mechanisms and medical responses.

J C Pechère1.   

Abstract

Some Gram-negative, non-fastidious bacilli, although classified as susceptible by conventional susceptibility testing methods, become resistant during therapy with the newer beta-lactam compounds. Emergence of resistance results primarily from the selection of resistant clones pre-existing within the susceptible bacterial populations. Most of the resistant clones produce large amounts of beta-lactamases which inhibit the beta-lactam antibiotics by hydrolysis, rather than by binding. In addition, resistant clones can limit the penetration of beta-lactam molecules through the outer membrane by a decreased expression of their porins. Less commonly, when beta-lactamase activity together with alteration of the permeability barrier does not prevent the access of the antibiotic molecules to their target, altered penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) can produce resistance. However, the risk of resistance emerging during therapy varies with the beta-lactam drug administered. Some compounds such as cefpirome, BMY 28142, SCH 34343, or imipenem appear to be associated with a low risk. In addition, emergence of resistance can be reduced by using higher dosages of beta-lactam agents, or by combining them with other drugs such as aminoglycosides or quinolones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3260854     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-198800352-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  26 in total

1.  Combination therapy: a way to limit emergence of resistance?

Authors:  M Michéa-Hamzehpour; J C Pechère; B Marchou; R Auckenthaler
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1986-06-30       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Novel resistance selected by the new expanded-spectrum cephalosporins: a concern.

Authors:  C C Sanders
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Beta-lactamase lability and inducer power of newer beta-lactam antibiotics in relation to their activity against beta-lactamase-inducibility mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  D M Livermore; Y J Yang
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Mechanism of resistance of an ampicillin-resistant, beta-lactamase-negative clinical isolate of Haemophilus influenzae type b to beta-lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  T R Parr; L E Bryan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Hydrolysis of Cefotaxime by a beta-lactamase from Bacteroides fragilis.

Authors:  J C Pechère; R Guay; J Dubois; R Letarte
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Development of beta-lactam-resistant Enterobacter cloacae in mice.

Authors:  B Marchou; M Michea-Hamzehpour; C Lucain; J C Pechère
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Comparative activities of piperacillin, ceftazidime, and amikacin, alone and in all possible combinations, against experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in neutropenic rats.

Authors:  D E Johnson; B Thompson; F M Calia
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Efficacy of amikacin and ceftazidime in experimental aortic valve endocarditis due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  A S Bayer; D Norman; K S Kim
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Resistance caused by decreased penetration of beta-lactam antibiotics into Enterobacter cloacae.

Authors:  K Bush; S K Tanaka; D P Bonner; R B Sykes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  A plasmid-mediated cephalosporinase from Achromobacter species.

Authors:  R Levesque; P H Roy; R Letarte; J C Pechère
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Resistance to third generation cephalosporins: the current situation.

Authors:  J C Pechère
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Differences in the resistant variants of Enterobacter cloacae selected by extended-spectrum cephalosporins.

Authors:  J C Fung-Tomc; E Gradelski; E Huczko; T J Dougherty; R E Kessler; D P Bonner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Cefuroxime prophylaxis in cardiovascular surgery: clinical, microbiological, and ecological impact.

Authors:  L O Gentry; S M Birovljev; B Radovancević; D A Cooley
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1992

Review 4.  Cefepime. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  L B Barradell; H M Bryson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 9.546

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.