Literature DB >> 15227466

Cefuroxime prophylaxis in cardiovascular surgery: clinical, microbiological, and ecological impact.

L O Gentry1, S M Birovljev, B Radovancević, D A Cooley.   

Abstract

To determine the efficacy of cefuroxime as a prophylactic agent against infection, we retrospectively evaluated patients who had undergone cefuroxime therapy for cardiovascular surgery procedures in the years 1987 and 1990. In the 403 evaluable patients (203 in 1987 and 200 in 1990), we noted a postoperative surgical wound infection rate of 3% and a nosocomial infection rate of 3%. These rates have remained constant in 1987 and 1990. Despite more than a 6-fold increase in cefuroxime consumption during this same period, we have not observed a selection for staphylococcal infections in cardiovascular surgery patients, nor have we detected a selection for resistant staphylococci in our institution. Our original criteria that caused us to select cefuroxime for routine prophylaxis-notably its equivalent efficacy and safety as compared with other cephalosporins, and its lack of an adverse impact on the hospital flora-remain valid.

Entities:  

Year:  1992        PMID: 15227466      PMCID: PMC325013     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  15 in total

1.  A 7-year survey of drug resistance in aerobic and anaerobic fecal bacteria of surgical inpatients: clinical relevance and relation to local antibiotic consumption.

Authors:  P A Kling; R Ostensson; S Granström; L G Burman
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  1989

2.  Cardiovascular surgery prophylaxis. A randomized, controlled comparison of cefazolin and cefuroxime.

Authors:  B N Doebbeling; M A Pfaller; K R Kuhns; R M Massanari; D M Behrendt; R P Wenzel
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Emergence of resistance during beta-lactam therapy of gram-negative infections. Bacterial mechanisms and medical responses.

Authors:  J C Pechère
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Antibiotic prophylaxis for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  A R Penketh; M H Wansbrough-Jones; E Wright; F Imrie; J R Pepper; D J Parker
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-06-29       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  The epidemiology of enterococci.

Authors:  C Chenoweth; D Schaberg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Inoculum effect on growth-delay time of oxacillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis exposed to cefamandole, cefazolin, and cefuroxime.

Authors:  E Yourassowsky; M P van der Linden; F Crokaert
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Hospital stay length as an effect modifier of other risk factors for nosocomial infection.

Authors:  M Delgado-Rodríguez; A Bueno-Cavanillas; R López-Gigosos; J de Dios Luna-Castillo; J Guillén-Solvas; O Moreno-Abril; B Rodríguez-Tuñas; A Cueto-Espinar; R Rodríguez-Contreras; R Gálvez-Vargas
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Failure of cephalosporins to prevent Staphylococcus aureus surgical wound infections.

Authors:  D S Kernodle; D C Classen; J P Burke; A B Kaiser
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-02-16       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Transferable enzymatic resistance to third-generation cephalosporins during nosocomial outbreak of multiresistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Authors:  C Brun-Buisson; P Legrand; A Philippon; F Montravers; M Ansquer; J Duval
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-08-08       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in open-heart surgery: a comparison of cefamandole, cefuroxime, and cefazolin.

Authors:  L O Gentry; B J Zeluff; D A Cooley
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.