Daniel H Jung1, Eva DuGoff2, Maureen Smith3,4,5, Mari Palta3, Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi6,7,8, John Mullahy3. 1. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. 2. Health Services Administration, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, MD. 3. Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. 4. Health Innovation Program, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. 5. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. 6. School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. 7. William S Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Madison, WI. 8. Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent to which all-cause 30-day readmission rate varies by Medicare program within the same hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: We used conditional logistic regression clustered by hospital and generalized estimating equations to compare the odds of unplanned all-cause 30-day readmission between Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) and Medicare Advantage (MA). DATA COLLECTION: Wisconsin Health Information Organization collects claims data from various payers including private insurance, Medicare, and Medicaid, twice a year. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: For 62 of 66 hospitals, hospital-level readmission rates for MA were lower than those for Medicare FFS. The odds of 30-day readmission in MA were 0.92 times lower than Medicare FFS within the same hospital (odds ratio, 0.93; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.89-0.98). The adjusted overall readmission rates of Medicare FFS and MA were 14.9 percent and 11.9 percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: These findings provide additional evidence of potential variations in readmission risk by payer and support the need for improved monitoring systems in hospitals that incorporate payer-specific data. Further research is needed to delineate specific care delivery factors that contribute to differential readmission risk by payer source.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent to which all-cause 30-day readmission rate varies by Medicare program within the same hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: We used conditional logistic regression clustered by hospital and generalized estimating equations to compare the odds of unplanned all-cause 30-day readmission between Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) and Medicare Advantage (MA). DATA COLLECTION: Wisconsin Health Information Organization collects claims data from various payers including private insurance, Medicare, and Medicaid, twice a year. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: For 62 of 66 hospitals, hospital-level readmission rates for MA were lower than those for Medicare FFS. The odds of 30-day readmission in MA were 0.92 times lower than Medicare FFS within the same hospital (odds ratio, 0.93; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.89-0.98). The adjusted overall readmission rates of Medicare FFS and MA were 14.9 percent and 11.9 percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: These findings provide additional evidence of potential variations in readmission risk by payer and support the need for improved monitoring systems in hospitals that incorporate payer-specific data. Further research is needed to delineate specific care delivery factors that contribute to differential readmission risk by payer source.
Authors: Luke O Hansen; Jeffrey L Greenwald; Tina Budnitz; Eric Howell; Lakshmi Halasyamani; Greg Maynard; Arpana Vidyarthi; Eric A Coleman; Mark V Williams Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Yue Li; Xi Cen; Xueya Cai; Dongliang Wang; Caroline Pinto Thirukumaran; Laurent G Glance Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Linda Calvillo-King; Danielle Arnold; Kathryn J Eubank; Matthew Lo; Pete Yunyongying; Heather Stieglitz; Ethan A Halm Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-10-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Justin W Timbie; Andy Bogart; Cheryl L Damberg; Marc N Elliott; Ann Haas; Sarah J Gaillot; Elizabeth H Goldstein; Susan M Paddock Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Amy J H Kind; Steve Jencks; Jane Brock; Menggang Yu; Christie Bartels; William Ehlenbach; Caprice Greenberg; Maureen Smith Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Bruce E Landon; Alan M Zaslavsky; Robert C Saunders; L Gregory Pawlson; Joseph P Newhouse; John Z Ayanian Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Elizabeth H Bradley; Leslie Curry; Leora I Horwitz; Heather Sipsma; Yongfei Wang; Mary Norine Walsh; Don Goldmann; Neal White; Ileana L Piña; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2013-07
Authors: Amit Kumar; Momotazur Rahman; Amal N Trivedi; Linda Resnik; Pedro Gozalo; Vincent Mor Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2018-06-26 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Daniel H Jung; Eva DuGoff; Maureen Smith; Mari Palta; Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi; John Mullahy Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 3.402