Literature DB >> 23213144

Analysis Of Medicare Advantage HMOs compared with traditional Medicare shows lower use of many services during 2003-09.

Bruce E Landon1, Alan M Zaslavsky, Robert C Saunders, L Gregory Pawlson, Joseph P Newhouse, John Z Ayanian.   

Abstract

Enrollment in Medicare Advantage, the managed care program for Medicare beneficiaries, has grown rapidly, from 4.6 million enrollees in 2003 to 12.8 million by 2012, or 27 percent of all current Medicare beneficiaries. We analyzed utilization patterns of enrollees in Medicare Advantage health maintenance organization (HMO) plans compared to matched samples of people in traditional Medicare during 2003-09, to ascertain whether the HMO enrollees demonstrated different levels of use of services, which can be a hallmark of more integrated care. We found that utilization rates in some major categories, including emergency departments and ambulatory surgery or procedures, generally were 20-30 percent lower in Medicare Advantage HMOs in all years. Medicare Advantage HMO enrollees initially had lower rates of ambulatory visits and hospitalizations, although these rates converged by 2008; they also received about 10 percent fewer hip or knee replacements. In contrast, HMO enrollees underwent more coronary bypass surgery than patients in traditional Medicare. These findings suggest that overall, Medicare Advantage HMO enrollees might use fewer services and be experiencing more appropriate use of services than enrollees in traditional Medicare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23213144      PMCID: PMC3587962          DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  19 in total

Review 1.  Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter?: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger; Jarvis T Chen; Pamela D Waterman; Mah-Jabeen Soobader; S V Subramanian; Rosa Carson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Use of high-cost operative procedures by Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in for-profit and not-for-profit health plans.

Authors:  Eric C Schneider; Alan M Zaslavsky; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Comparison of performance of traditional Medicare vs Medicare managed care.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; Alan M Zaslavsky; Shulamit L Bernard; Matthew J Cioffi; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-04-14       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Use of geocoding in managed care settings to identify quality disparities.

Authors:  Allen M Fremont; Arlene Bierman; Steve L Wickstrom; Chloe E Bird; Mona Shah; José J Escarce; Thomas Horstman; Thomas Rector
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology.

Authors:  N Krieger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Payment policy and the growth of Medicare Advantage.

Authors:  Carlos Zarabozo; Scott Harrison
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  A conceptual model of the effects of health care organizations on the quality of medical care.

Authors:  B E Landon; I B Wilson; P D Cleary
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-06       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Regional variations in diagnostic practices.

Authors:  Yunjie Song; Jonathan Skinner; Julie Bynum; Jason Sutherland; John E Wennberg; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Painting a truer picture of US socioeconomic and racial/ethnic health inequalities: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger; Jarvis T Chen; Pamela D Waterman; David H Rehkopf; S V Subramanian
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization: a report by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Manesh R Patel; Gregory J Dehmer; John W Hirshfeld; Peter K Smith; John A Spertus
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  38 in total

1.  Health Care Spending and Utilization in Public and Private Medicare.

Authors:  Vilsa Curto; Liran Einav; Amy Finkelstein; Jonathan Levin; Jay Bhattacharya
Journal:  Am Econ J Appl Econ       Date:  2019-04

2.  Can Older Adults Accurately Report Their Use of Physical Rehabilitation Services?

Authors:  Vicki A Freedman; Judith D Kasper; Alan Jette
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  The Paradox of Coding - Policy Concerns Raised by Risk-Based Provider Contracts.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; Robert E Mechanic
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Dual-System Use and Intermediate Health Outcomes among Veterans Enrolled in Medicare Advantage Plans.

Authors:  Alicia L Cooper; Lan Jiang; Jean Yoon; Mary E Charlton; Ira B Wilson; Vincent Mor; Kenneth W Kizer; Amal N Trivedi
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Likelihood of hospital readmission in Medicare Advantage and Fee-For-Service within same hospital.

Authors:  Daniel H Jung; Eva DuGoff; Maureen Smith; Mari Palta; Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi; John Mullahy
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Getting What We Pay For: How Do Risk-Based Payments to Medicare Advantage Plans Compare with Alternative Measures of Beneficiary Health Risk?

Authors:  Paul D Jacobs; Richard Kronick
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Sample Selection for Medicare Risk Adjustment Due to Systematically Missing Data.

Authors:  Savannah L Bergquist; Thomas G McGuire; Timothy J Layton; Sherri Rose
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Paying Medicare Advantage plans: To level or tilt the playing field.

Authors:  Jacob Glazer; Thomas G McGuire
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Medicare Advantage and Fee-for-Service Performance on Clinical Quality and Patient Experience Measures: Comparisons from Three Large States.

Authors:  Justin W Timbie; Andy Bogart; Cheryl L Damberg; Marc N Elliott; Ann Haas; Sarah J Gaillot; Elizabeth H Goldstein; Susan M Paddock
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Overuse and insurance plan type in a privately insured population.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Carrie H Colla; Nancy E Morden; Thomas D Sequist; Alexander J Mainor; Zhonghe Li; Kevin H Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.