| Literature DB >> 32601338 |
Grant Theron1,2, Jason Limberis1, Rouxjeane Venter2, Liezel Smith1,2, Elize Pietersen1, Aliasgar Esmail1, Greg Calligaro1, Julian Te Riele3, Marianna de Kock2, Paul van Helden2, Tawanda Gumbo4, Taane G Clark5,6, Kevin Fennelly7, Robin Warren2, Keertan Dheda8,9.
Abstract
A burgeoning epidemic of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) threatens to derail global control efforts. Although the mechanisms remain poorly clarified, drug-resistant strains are widely believed to be less infectious than drug-susceptible strains. Consequently, we hypothesized that lower proportions of patients with drug-resistant TB would have culturable Mycobacterium tuberculosis from respirable, cough-generated aerosols compared to patients with drug-susceptible TB, and that multiple factors, including mycobacterial genomic variation, would predict culturable cough aerosol production. We enumerated the colony forming units in aerosols (≤10 µm) from 452 patients with TB (227 with drug resistance), compared clinical characteristics, and performed mycobacterial whole-genome sequencing, dormancy phenotyping and drug-susceptibility analyses on M. tuberculosis from sputum. After considering treatment duration, we found that almost half of the patients with drug-resistant TB were cough aerosol culture-positive. Surprisingly, neither mycobacterial genomic variants, lineage, nor dormancy status predicted cough aerosol culture positivity. However, mycobacterial sputum bacillary load and clinical characteristics, including a lower symptom score and stronger cough, were strongly predictive, thereby supporting targeted transmission-limiting interventions. Effective treatment largely abrogated cough aerosol culture positivity; however, this was not always rapid. These data question current paradigms, inform public health strategies and suggest the need to redirect TB transmission-associated research efforts toward host-pathogen interactions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32601338 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0940-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Med ISSN: 1078-8956 Impact factor: 53.440