BACKGROUND: Molecular typing is a valuable tool for gaining insight into spread of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Typing allows for clustering of cases whose isolates share an identical genotype, revealing epidemiologic relatedness. Observed distributions of genotypic cluster sizes of tuberculosis (TB) are highly skewed. A possible explanation for this skewness is the concept of "superspreading": a high heterogeneity in the number of secondary cases caused per infectious individual. Superspreading has been previously found for diseases such as severe acute respiratory syndrome and smallpox, where the entire transmission tree is known. So far, no method exists to relate superspreading to the distribution of genotypic cluster sizes. METHODS: We quantified heterogeneity in secondary infections per infectious individual by describing this number as a negative binomial distribution. The dispersion parameter k is a measure of superspreading; standard (homogeneous) models use values of k ≥ 1, whereas small values of k imply superspreading. We estimated this negative binomial dispersion parameter for TB in the Netherlands, using the genotypic cluster size distribution for all 8330 cases of culture confirmed, pulmonary TB diagnosed between 1993 and 2007 in the Netherlands. RESULTS: The dispersion parameter k was estimated at 0.10 (95% confidence interval = 0.09-0.12), well in the range of values consistent with superspreading. Simulation studies showed the method reliably estimates the dispersion parameter across a range of scenarios and parameter values. CONCLUSION: Heterogeneity in the number of secondary cases caused per infectious individual is a plausible explanation for the observed skewness in genotypic cluster size distribution of TB.
BACKGROUND: Molecular typing is a valuable tool for gaining insight into spread of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Typing allows for clustering of cases whose isolates share an identical genotype, revealing epidemiologic relatedness. Observed distributions of genotypic cluster sizes of tuberculosis (TB) are highly skewed. A possible explanation for this skewness is the concept of "superspreading": a high heterogeneity in the number of secondary cases caused per infectious individual. Superspreading has been previously found for diseases such as severe acute respiratory syndrome and smallpox, where the entire transmission tree is known. So far, no method exists to relate superspreading to the distribution of genotypic cluster sizes. METHODS: We quantified heterogeneity in secondary infections per infectious individual by describing this number as a negative binomial distribution. The dispersion parameter k is a measure of superspreading; standard (homogeneous) models use values of k ≥ 1, whereas small values of k imply superspreading. We estimated this negative binomial dispersion parameter for TB in the Netherlands, using the genotypic cluster size distribution for all 8330 cases of culture confirmed, pulmonary TB diagnosed between 1993 and 2007 in the Netherlands. RESULTS: The dispersion parameter k was estimated at 0.10 (95% confidence interval = 0.09-0.12), well in the range of values consistent with superspreading. Simulation studies showed the method reliably estimates the dispersion parameter across a range of scenarios and parameter values. CONCLUSION: Heterogeneity in the number of secondary cases caused per infectious individual is a plausible explanation for the observed skewness in genotypic cluster size distribution of TB.
Authors: Yuri F van der Heijden; Fareed Abdullah; Bruno B Andrade; Jason R Andrews; Devasahayam J Christopher; Julio Croda; Heather Ewing; David W Haas; Mark Hatherill; C Robert Horsburgh; Vidya Mave; Helder I Nakaya; Valeria Rolla; Sudha Srinivasan; Retna Indah Sugiyono; Cesar Ugarte-Gil; Carol Hamilton Journal: Tuberculosis (Edinb) Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 3.131
Authors: Grant Theron; Jason Limberis; Rouxjeane Venter; Liezel Smith; Elize Pietersen; Aliasgar Esmail; Greg Calligaro; Julian Te Riele; Marianna de Kock; Paul van Helden; Tawanda Gumbo; Taane G Clark; Kevin Fennelly; Robin Warren; Keertan Dheda Journal: Nat Med Date: 2020-06-29 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Jonathan L Zelner; Megan B Murray; Mercedes C Becerra; Jerome Galea; Leonid Lecca; Roger Calderon; Rosa Yataco; Carmen Contreras; Zibiao Zhang; Justin Manjourides; Bryan T Grenfell; Ted Cohen Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Jessica G King; Caetano Souto-Maior; Larissa M Sartori; Rafael Maciel-de-Freitas; M Gabriela M Gomes Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Jonathan P Smith; Neel R Gandhi; Benjamin J Silk; Ted Cohen; Benjamin Lopman; Kala Raz; Kathryn Winglee; Steve Kammerer; David Benkeser; Michael R Kramer; Andrew N Hill Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 4.860
Authors: Edward C Jones-López; Carlos Acuña-Villaorduña; Martin Ssebidandi; Mary Gaeddert; Rachel W Kubiak; Irene Ayakaka; Laura F White; Moses Joloba; Alphonse Okwera; Kevin P Fennelly Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-03-29 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Courtney R Plumlee; Fergal J Duffy; Benjamin H Gern; Jared L Delahaye; Sara B Cohen; Caleb R Stoltzfus; Tige R Rustad; Scott G Hansen; Michael K Axthelm; Louis J Picker; John D Aitchison; David R Sherman; Vitaly V Ganusov; Michael Y Gerner; Daniel E Zak; Kevin B Urdahl Journal: Cell Host Microbe Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 21.023