| Literature DB >> 35250898 |
Min Wang1,2, Yangyi Zhang1,2, Cheng Huang3, Jing Li1, Xin Shen1, Genming Zhao2, Yuan Jiang1, Qichao Pan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) has remained a tough problem in China. This study aims to identify the risk of tuberculosis transmission and to assess its characteristics.Entities:
Keywords: diagnostic delay; epidemiological investigation; genomic cluster; transmission; tuberculosis; whole-genome sequencing
Year: 2022 PMID: 35250898 PMCID: PMC8888905 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.768659
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Flow chart of study population and selection.
FIGURE 2Phylogenetic tree for the 354 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Shanghai, China, 2009–2018. The purple triangles represent isolates from relapsed cases (n = 9). The pink five-pointed stars indicate the clustered isolates, whose genetic distance is ≤12 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The outer ring shows the census register of patients, of which the green represents resident and the orange represents migrant. From inside to outside, the solid colorful circles represent drug resistance mutations for isoniazid, rifampicin, streptomycin, pyrazinamide, amikacin, kanamycin, capreomycin, ethionamide, para-aminosalicylic acid, and linezolid.
The cluster size and the number of genomic clusters of 94 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates.
| No of isolates in clusters (N) | No of clusters (N) | No of isolates (N) | Proportion (%) |
| 2 | 35 | 70 | 74.47 |
| 3 | 5 | 15 | 15.96 |
| 4 | 1 | 4 | 4.26 |
| 5 | 1 | 5 | 5.32 |
| Total | 42 | 94 | 100.00 |
Demographic, bacteriological, phenotypic resistance, and clinical characteristics of genomic clustered and non-clustered cases in Shanghai, China, 2009–2018.
| Characteristics | Clustered ( | Non-clustered ( | Total ( | χ2 |
| |||
|
| % |
| % |
| % | |||
|
| 0.36 | 0.55 | ||||||
| Male | 79 | 84.04 | 204 | 81.27 | 283 | 82.03 | ||
| Female | 15 | 15.96 | 47 | 18.73 | 62 | 17.97 | ||
|
| ||||||||
| 15–24 | 15 | 15.96 | 27 | 10.76 | 42 | 12.17 | Ref | – |
| 25–34 | 10 | 10.64 | 24 | 9.56 | 34 | 9.85 | 0.34 | 0.56 |
| 35–44 | 7 | 7.45 | 17 | 6.77 | 24 | 6.96 | 0.29 | 0.59 |
| 45–54 | 14 | 14.89 | 28 | 11.16 | 42 | 12.18 | 0.05 | 0.82 |
| 55–64 | 23 | 24.47 | 31 | 12.35 | 54 | 15.65 | 0.47 | 0.49 |
| 65≥ | 25 | 26.60 | 124 | 49.40 | 149 | 43.19 | 6.77 | 0.01 |
|
| 3.94 |
| ||||||
| Resident | 82 | 87.23 | 195 | 77.69 | 277 | 80.29 | ||
| Migrant | 12 | 12.77 | 56 | 22.31 | 68 | 19.71 | ||
|
| 4.50 |
| ||||||
| Student | 11 | 11.70 | 13 | 5.18 | 24 | 6.96 | ||
| Non-student | 83 | 88.30 | 238 | 94.82 | 321 | 93.04 | ||
|
| 1.88 | 0.17 | ||||||
| Yes | 17 | 18.09 | 31 | 12.35 | 48 | 13.91 | ||
| No | 77 | 81.91 | 220 | 87.65 | 297 | 86.09 | ||
|
| 5.76 |
| ||||||
| Yes | 88 | 93.62 | 210 | 83.67 | 298 | 86.38 | ||
| No | 6 | 6.38 | 41 | 16.33 | 47 | 13.62 | ||
|
| 0.26 | |||||||
| Yes | 7 | 7.45 | 10 | 3.98 | 17 | 4.93 | ||
| No | 87 | 92.55 | 241 | 96.02 | 328 | 95.07 | ||
|
| 7.11 |
| ||||||
| Yes | 19 | 20.21 | 24 | 9.56 | 43 | 12.46 | ||
| No | 75 | 79.79 | 227 | 90.44 | 302 | 87.54 | ||
|
| 6.43 |
| ||||||
| Yes | 22 | 23.40 | 31 | 12.35 | 53 | 15.36 | ||
| No | 72 | 76.60 | 220 | 87.65 | 292 | 84.64 | ||
|
| 6.45 |
| ||||||
| <14 days | 71 | 75.53 | 218 | 86.85 | 289 | 83.77 | ||
| ≥14 days | 23 | 24.47 | 33 | 13.15 | 56 | 16.23 | ||
|
| 1.95 | 0.38 | ||||||
| Clinical consultation | 35 | 37.23 | 98 | 39.8 | 133 | 39.00 | ||
| Referral | 58 | 61.70 | 140 | 56.68 | 198 | 58.06 | ||
| Others | 1 | 1.06 | 9 | 3.64 | 10 | 2.93 | ||
|
| 0.42 | 0.51 | ||||||
| Yes | 7 | 7.45 | 24 | 9.72 | 31 | 9.09 | ||
| No | 87 | 92.55 | 223 | 90.28 | 310 | 90.91 | ||
|
| 0.56 | 0.45 | ||||||
| Yes | 63 | 67.74 | 174 | 71.9 | 237 | 70.75 | ||
| No | 30 | 32.26 | 68 | 28.1 | 98 | 29.25 | ||
|
| 0 | 0.99 | ||||||
| Yes | 33 | 35.11 | 85 | 35.12 | 118 | 35.12 | ||
| No | 61 | 64.89 | 157 | 64.88 | 218 | 64.88 | ||
*Univariate logistic analysis, Ref, reference.
**The clinical information of some samples was missing.
The bold values mean these factors were statistically significant.
Univariate and multivariable regression analysis on the risk factors of genomic clustering.
| Characteristics | Total ( | Clustered ( | Univariate analysis | Multivariable regression | ||
| COR (95% CI) |
| AOR (95% CI) |
| |||
| <65 | 196 | 69 (35.20) | 2.69 (1.60, 4.53) |
| 3.11 (1.76, 5.49) |
|
| ≥65 | 149 | 25 (16.78) | Ref | |||
|
| ||||||
| Student | 24 | 11 (45.83) | 2.43 (1.05, 5.63) |
| 1.54 (0.62, 3.84) | 0.35 |
| Non-student | 321 | 83 (25.86) | Ref | |||
|
| ||||||
| Resident | 277 | 82 (29.60) | 1.96 (0.99, 3.85) |
| 2.43 (1.18, 4.99) |
|
| Migrant | 68 | 12 (17.65) | Ref | |||
|
| ||||||
| ≥14 days | 56 | 23 (41.07) | 2.14 (1.18, 3.88) |
| 2.57 (1.34, 4.95) |
|
| <14 days | 289 | 71 (24.57) | Ref | |||
|
| ||||||
| Yes | 298 | 88 (29.53) | 2.86 (1.17, 6.99) |
| 3.35 (1.32, 8.53) |
|
| No | 47 | 6 (12.77) | Ref | |||
|
| ||||||
| Yes | 43 | 19 (44.19) | 2.40 (1.24, 4.62) |
| 2.36 (1.15, 4.88) |
|
| No | 302 | 75 (24.83) | Ref | |||
The bold values mean these factors were statistically significant.