| Literature DB >> 32601168 |
M Van den Kerkhof1, D Mabille1, S Hendrickx1, P Leprohon2, C E Mowbray3, S Braillard3, M Ouellette2, L Maes1, G Caljon4.
Abstract
Current antileishmanial treatment is hampered by limitations, such as drug toxicity and the risk of treatment failure, which may be related to parasitic drug resistance. Given the urgent need for novel drugs, the Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi) has undertaken a drug discovery program, which has resulted in the identification of aminopyrazoles, a highly promising antileishmanial chemical series. Multiple experiments have been performed to anticipate the propensity for resistance development. Resistance selection was performed by successive exposure of Leishmania infantum promastigotes (in vitro) and intracellular amastigotes (both in vitro and in golden Syrian hamsters). The stability of the resistant phenotypes was assessed after passage in mice and Lutzomyia longipalpis sandflies. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed to identify mutated genes, copy number variations (CNVs), and somy changes. The potential role of efflux pumps (the MDR and MRP efflux pumps) in the development of resistance was assessed by coincubation of aminopyrazoles with specific efflux pump inhibitors (verapamil, cyclosporine, and probenecid). Repeated drug exposure of amastigotes did not result in the emergence of drug resistance either in vitro or in vivo Selection at the promastigote stage, however, was able to select for parasites with reduced susceptibility (resistance index, 5.8 to 24.5). This phenotype proved to be unstable after in vivo passage in mice and sandflies, suggesting that nonfixed alterations are responsible for the elevated resistance. In line with this, single nucleotide polymorphisms and indels identified by whole-genome sequencing could not be directly linked to the decreased drug susceptibility. Copy number variations were absent, whereas somy changes were detected, which may have accounted for the transient acquisition of resistance. Finally, aminopyrazole activity was not influenced by the MDR and MRP efflux pump inhibitors tested. The selection performed does not suggest the rapid development of resistance against aminopyrazoles in the field. Karyotype changes may confer elevated levels of resistance, but these do not seem to be stable in the vertebrate and invertebrate hosts. MDR/MRP efflux pumps are not likely to significantly impact the activity of the aminopyrazole leads.Entities:
Keywords: ABC transporters; Leishmania; aminopyrazoles; resistance
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32601168 PMCID: PMC7449183 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00152-20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother ISSN: 0066-4804 Impact factor: 5.191
In vitro susceptibility of intracellular amastigotes to DNDI-1044 after each in vitro selection cycle
| Cycle | Mean IC50 (μM) ± SEM | |
|---|---|---|
| ITMAP263 | LEM4038 | |
| Wild type | 0.19 ± 0.08 | 0.35 ± 0.07 |
| Cycle 1 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 0.43 ± 0.08 |
| Cycle 2 | 0.60 ± 0.07 | 0.27 ± 0.04 |
| Cycle 3 | 0.45 ± 0.09 | 0.36 ± 0.11 |
| Cycle 4 | 0.53 ± 0.15 | 0.56 ± 0.17 |
| Cycle 5 | 0.24 ± 0.08 | 0.86 ± 0.30 |
The results are based on two independent replicates run in duplicate.
FIG 1Overview of the stepwise generation of extracellular promastigote lines resistant to two APs.
Resistance index for the AP-selected lines after the highest exposure
| Compound | Extracellular promastigote assay | Intracellular amastigote assay | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild type vs LEM3323Cl4/1044 | Wild type vs LEM3323Cl4/8012 | Wild type vs LEM3323Cl4/1044 | Wild type vs LEM3323Cl4/8012 | |||||||||
| Mean IC50 (μM) ± SEM | RI | Mean IC50 (μM) ± SEM | RI | Mean IC50 (μM) ± SEM | RI | Mean IC50 (μM) ± SEM | RI | |||||
| Wild type | LEM3323Cl4/1044 | Wild type | LEM3323Cl4/8012 | Wild type | LEM3323Cl4/1044 | Wild type | LEM3323Cl4/8012 | |||||
| DNDI-1044 | 0.20 ± 0.04 | 4.90 ± 0.55 | 24.5 | 0.34 ± 0.11 | 2.78 ± 0.55 | 8.2 | 0.44 ± 0.12 | 2.01 ± 0.46 | 4.6 | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 0.37 ± 0.01 | 1.3 |
| DNDI-8012 | 0.52 ± 0.02 | 7.55 ± 1.30 | 14.5 | 0.62 ± 0.12 | 3.62 ± 0.31 | 5.8 | 0.54 ± 0.10 | 2.20 ± 0.35 | 4.1 | 0.22 ± 0.00 | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 0.9 |
The results are based on two independent replicates run in duplicate. The intracellular assay with LEM3323Cl4/8012 was performed only once in duplicate, as no differences were observed. RI, resistance index.
FIG 2Comparison of in vitro intracellular amastigote (A and C) and extracellular promastigote (B and D) susceptibility to the selected AP series between the wild-type parent (LEM3323Cl4) and the successfully cultured adapted clones of the DNDI-1044-selected (A and B) and DNDI-8012-selected (C and D) resistant lines. Results are expressed as the mean IC50 ± SEM and are based on two independent replicates run in duplicate (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001). For DNDI-8012-generated clones, only a few clones were selected for amastigote susceptibility assessment.
Resistance index for the AP-selected lines in the extracellular promastigote assay
| Compound | Wild type vs LEM3323Cl4/1044Cl1 | Wild type vs LEM3323Cl4/8012Cl2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean IC50 (μM) ± SEM | RI | Mean IC50 (μM) ± SEM | RI | |||
| Wild type | LEM3323Cl4/1044Cl1 | Wild type | LEM3323Cl4/8012Cl2 | |||
| DNDI-1044 | 0.50 ± 0.06 | 2.79 ± 0.61 | 5.6 | 0.50 ± 0.06 | 2.52 ± 0.81 | 5.0 |
| DNDI-8012 | 0.67 ± 0.12 | 3.48 ± 0.75 | 5.2 | 0.67 ± 0.12 | 3.70 ± 1.17 | 5.5 |
| DNDI-5561 | 0.82 ± 0.16 | 4.45 ± 0.93 | 5.4 | 0.82 ± 0.16 | 6.57 ± 0.76 | 8.0 |
Results are based on two independent replicates run in duplicate. RI, resistance index.
Resistance index for the AP-selected lines in the intracellular amastigote assay
| Compound | Wild type vs LEM3323Cl4/1044Cl1 | Wild type vs LEM3323Cl4/8012Cl2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean IC50 (μM) ± SEM | RI | Mean IC50 (μM) ± SEM | RI | |||
| Wild type | LEM3323Cl4/1044Cl1 | Wild type | LEM3323Cl4/8012Cl2 | |||
| DNDI-1044 | 0.18 ± 0.05 | 0.61 ± 0.08 | 3.4 | 0.21 ± 0.03 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 1.0 |
| DNDI-8012 | 0.30 ± 0.09 | 0.90 ± 0.10 | 3.0 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | 1.5 |
| DNDI-5561 | 0.10 ± 0.003 | 0.37 ± 0.09 | 3.6 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.28 ± 0.10 | 1.8 |
Results are based on two independent replicates run in duplicate. RI, resistance index.
FIG 3Comparison of the in vitro amastigote multiplication ratio between the wild-type parent (LEM3323Cl4) and the selected resistant lines. Results are expressed as the mean amastigote multiplication ratio ± SEM and are based on one experiment run in sextuplet (*, P < 0.05).
Comparison of in vitro extracellular promastigote susceptibility to the selected AP series before and after in vivo passage (mouse and sandfly) between the wild type and the generated clones
| Time relative to passage | Compound | Mean IC50 (μM) ± SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild type | LEM3323Cl4/1044Cl1 | LEM3323Cl4/8012Cl2 | ||
| Original | DNDI-1044 | 0.46 ± 0.05 | 3.37 ± 0.54 (7.3)**** | 2.63 ± 0.25 (5.7)*** |
| DNDI-8012 | 0.66 ± 0.09 | 4.12 ± 0.89 (6.2)**** | 3.81 ± 0.43 (5.7)**** | |
| DNDI-5561 | 0.80 ± 0.08 | 9.28 ± 1.01 (11) | 7.68 ± 1.09 (9.6)* | |
| After mouse passage | DNDI-1044 | 0.61 ± 0.09 | 0.64 ± 0.10 (1.0) | 1.86 ± 0.15 (3.0) |
| DNDI-8012 | 0.73 ± 0.15 | 1.01 ± 0.06 (1.4) | 2.68 ± 0.29 (3.7) | |
| DNDI-5561 | 0.68 ± 0.05 | 0.95 ± 0.16 (1.4) | 2.18 ± 0.54 (3.2) | |
| After sandfly passage | DNDI-1044 | 0.51 ± 0.07 | 0.55 ± 0.10 (1.1) | 1.36 ± 0.27 (2.6) |
| DNDI-8012 | 0.78 ± 0.12 | 0.85 ± 0.13 (1.1) | 1.76 ± 0.17 (2.2)* | |
| DNDI-5561 | 0.74 ± 0.08 | 0.76 ± 0.07 (1.0) | 1.20 ± 0.39 (1.6) | |
Results are based on three independent replicates run in duplicate. The resistance index (RI) is given in parentheses and was always calculated with respect to the corresponding wild type. *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.
Overview of common mutated genes in both LEM332Cl4/1044Cl1 and LEM3323Cl4/8012Cl2
| LEM3323Cl4 strain | Gene identifier | Position of mutation | Ref/mut nucleotide | Allele frequency | Ref/mut AA | Gene function |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1044Cl1 | LinJ.03.0410 | 156 | GA/G | Hom. | NA | 60S acidic ribosomal protein P2, putative |
| 8012Cl2 | 156 | GA/G | Hom. | NA | ||
| 1044Cl1 | LinJ.10.0390 | 172 | G/A | Hom. | E/K | Folate biopterin transporter, putative |
| 8012Cl2 | 172 | G/A | Hom. | E/K | ||
| 1044Cl1 | LinJ.12.0070 | 1277 | G/C | Het. | R/P | Hypothetical protein, unknown function |
| 8012Cl2 | 1277 | G/C | Het. | R/P | ||
| 1044Cl1 | LinJ.14.1180 | 2511 | G/C | Het. | E/D | Kinesin K39, putative |
| 8012Cl2 | 1885 | T/G | Het. | S/A | ||
| 8012Cl2 | 2511 | G/C | Het. | E/D | ||
| 1044Cl1 | LinJ.14.1190 | 3770 | A/C | Het. | E/A | Kinesin K39, putative |
| 8012Cl2 | 3770 | A/C | Het. | E/A | ||
| 8012Cl2 | 5699 | G/A | Hom. | S/N | ||
| 1044Cl1 | LinJ.15.0290 | 2429 | T/G | Het. | L/R | Hypothetical protein, conserved |
| 8012Cl2 | 561 | C/CGTCTCGGAAGCGGAGTCGCTCTCAGCCGCG | Het. | NA | ||
| 1044Cl1 | LinJ.18.1290 | 283 | T/G | Het. | S/A | Hypothetical protein, conserved |
| 8012Cl2 | 283 | T/G | Het. | S/A | ||
| 1044Cl1 | LinJ.19.1690 | 957 | AGCGCCCCAGCCGAGCGAGGCGGCGCCGGTGTCTGCAGTGGAGGCTCTGCCTCCGACGCCTGCCGAGTGCGCATCTGAGGCG/A | Het. | NA | Hypothetical protein |
| 8012Cl2 | 957 | AGCGCCCCAGCCGAGCGAGGCGGCGCCGGTGTCTGCAGTGGAGGCTCTGCCTCCGACGCCTGCCGAGTGCGCATCTGAGGCG/A | Het. | NA | ||
| 1044Cl1 | LinJ.27.2060 | 294 | T/TG | Het. | NA | Hypothetical protein, unknown function |
| 8012Cl2 | 294 | T/TG | Het. | NA | ||
| 1044Cl1 | LinJ.29.0270 | 546 | T/G | Het. | E/D | Hypothetical protein, conserved |
| 8012Cl2 | 546 | T/G | Het. | E/D | ||
| 8012Cl2 | 544 | C/G | Het. | E/Q | ||
| 1044Cl1 | LinJ.29.2240 | 1267 | G/A | Hom. | L/F | Hypothetical protein, conserved |
| 8012Cl2 | 1267 | G/A | Hom. | L/F | ||
| 1044Cl1 | LinJ.31.1290 | 3139 | G/C | Het. | R/G | P-glycoprotein e ABCC4 |
| 8012Cl2 | 3350 | A/C | Het. | L/R | ||
| 8012Cl2 | 3139 | G/C | Het. | R/G | ||
| 1044Cl1 | LinJ.32.1310 | 827 | G/C | Het. | S/T | Ubiquitin hydrolase, putative; cysteine peptidase Clan CA family C19, putative |
| 8012Cl2 | 827 | G/C | Het. | S/T | ||
| 1044Cl1 | LinJ.33.3230 | 5873 | A/G | Het. | Y/C | Hypothetical protein, conserved |
| 8012Cl2 | 5873 | A/G | Het. | Y/C | ||
| 1044Cl1 | LinJ.34.0710 | 2417 | T/C | Het. | K/R | Flagellar attachment zone protein, putative |
| 8012Cl2 | 2417 | T/C | Het. | K/R | ||
| 1044Cl1 | LinJ.34.2650 | 544 | T/G | Het. | S/A | Amastin-like surface protein, putative |
| 8012Cl2 | 544 | T/G | Het. | S/A | ||
| 1044Cl1 | LinJ.35.0490 | 11527 | G/A | Het. | A/T | Proteophosphoglycan ppg4 |
| 8012Cl2 | 11527 | G/A | Het. | A/T | ||
| 1044Cl1 | LinJ.35.0510 | 721 | G/A | Hom. | A/T | Proteophosphoglycan ppg4 |
| 8012Cl2 | 721 | G/A | Het. | A/T | ||
| 8012Cl2 | 733 | C/G | Het. | L/V | ||
| 1044Cl1 | LinJ.35.0520 | 6859 | G/A | Het. | G/S | Proteophosphoglycan ppg4 |
| 8012Cl2 | 6859 | G/A | Het. | G/S | ||
| 1044Cl1 | LinJ.35.0540 | 685 | T/C | Het. | C/R | Proteophosphoglycan 5 |
| 8012Cl2 | 685 | T/C | Het. | C/R |
Ref/mut, reference/mutated; Hom., homozygous; Het., heterozygous; NA, not applicable due to frameshift; AA, amino acid.
Overview of the ploidy of the wild-type line and both resistant clones
Chromosomal copy numbers are indicated with numbers and shades of blue ranging from light blue (mono- and disomic) to dark blue (tri- and tetrasomic). WT, wild type.
FIG 4Effect of coincubation of verapamil, cyclosporine, and probenecid with the aminopyrazoles for L. infantum (A and C) and L. donovani (B and D) in the intracellular amastigote (A and B) and extracellular promastigote (C and D) susceptibility assays. Results are based on two independent repeats run in duplicate and are expressed as the mean IC50 ± standard mean of error (SEM) (*, P < 0.05).